Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Building a resilient democracy: Unmasking the true threats

Building a resilient democracy: Unmasking the true threats
Getty Images

Becvar serves as Chief Operating Officer of the Bridge Alliance.

In our highly charged political climate, the assertion that polarization is the most urgent issue facing America is a statement often heard (and repeated). But is it truly the crux of the matter?


The May newsletter from Horizons Project brought forward a perspective on this topic by offering reference to a podcast featuring Shannon McGregor called “Is this Democracy.” McGregor challenges the notion that polarization is the core problem, suggesting instead that the major threat to American democracy lies in the radicalizing right. By labeling polarization as the main issue, we may be taking an easy way out, avoiding the critical examination of the actual problem at hand, and fostering an unhealthy rhetoric of reconciliation.

On the latest “How Do We Fix It?” podcast, Bill Shireman discussed the notion that the majority of common-sense voters defy the prevailing divided paradigm. Their discussion highlighted how the recent debt ceiling compromise highlighted that party leaders could work together when necessary, even while their members fan the flames of partisan blame. Similarly, the Democracy Works podcast delved into the perverse incentives and resulting behaviors within the current political system that significantly challenge democracy. Addressing this challenge requires the dedication of public servants and constituents who reject candidates playing games with the well-being of our nation.

Acknowledging the radicalizing aspect of some of America’s political right, anti-Trump conservatives have taken action. In a featured piece in The Fulcrum, David L. Nevins highlights the efforts of organizations like the Renew America Movement, Stand Up Republic, RePAIR, and The New Conservatives Summit. Moreover, Republican lawmakers supporting the For Our Freedom Amendment were recently highlighted by American Promise. The Election Reformers Network reminds us that we can’t always assume the worst about political actors, as evidenced by Republicans’ involvement in the Electoral Count Reform Act. However, recent legislative actions by Texas Republicans on election rules serve as a stark reminder of the challenges we continue to face.

At the Bridge Alliance, we firmly believe that there is no single solution to cure the ailments of our democracy. A recent study by More in Common, reported by the American Values Coalition, revealed that correcting misperceptions about those from the “other party” reduced partisan animosity - but the effect disappeared within a week. This study reinforces the importance of adopting a multi-level approach to address these issues. We need dedicated leaders, and constituents must demand more from them.

Democracy relies on an informed and engaged citizenry, making civic education key to a democratic future. It empowers individuals to evaluate information critically and demand better news reporting. Engaging in conversations with those outside our comfort zones is vital to becoming better civic stewards. Applying hard-earned insights from the peacebuilding and mediation field is essential to be effective. We also need structural changes in how and with what funding we elect our representatives to ensure a healthy democracy.

Fortunately, our nation has a growing and dynamic ecosystem of individuals and organizations tirelessly working towards shared goals. They continue to persevere despite facing backlash and personal risk, driven by their determination to build a stronger democracy for all. Most importantly, they demonstrate that addressing the underlying issues, rather than risking complacency by labeling them all as simply ‘polarization,’ is essential. Only by confronting the genuine threats to our democracy can we pave the way for a more resilient and healthy democratic future.

Read More

elementary school classroom
Urgent action is needed for our beloved public schools to renew civic life, writes Goodwin.
skynesher/Getty Images

Teach Leveraging in Middle and High School To Promote Democracy

It's all about leverage. You hear this from a lot of people. Thomas Friedman said it years ago in one of his Sunday New York Times columns on foreign policy. He was referring to international relations. In particular, he was talking about bargaining leverage, namely the kind of leverage that is needed to motivate an ally or an opponent to change their course of action, whether it concerns trade, military build-up, or political alignments.

People in business, especially sophisticated big business, talk about leverage all the time. Gary Hamel and C. K. Prahalad wrote a chapter in their famous book, Competing for the Future, that was all about leverage, although the concept of leverage they were talking about was resource leverage, not bargaining leverage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

If approved, the Democracy Voucher program would bring in $4.5 million each year through a property tax.

Road Red Runner/Adobe Stock

Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

A public funding mechanism for Seattle elections is up for renewal in next week's election.

The Democracy Voucher program was passed 10 years ago. It offers voters four $25 vouchers to use each election cycle for candidates who accept certain fundraising and spending limits. Supporters said it is a model for more inclusive democracy, touting higher turnout, increased participation from more small donors and a more diverse candidate field.

Spencer Olson, spokesperson for the group People Powered Elections Seattle, which supports Proposition 1, said the program helps level the playing field.

"It's really important that people's voices are heard and that candidates can run being supported by their constituents," Olson contended. "Versus just listening to those wealthiest donors, those special interests that have historically been the loudest voices at the table and really dominated what priorities rise to the top."

The voucher is supported by a property tax. Olson and other supporters hope to bring the model statewide. Critics said the program is not big enough to make a difference in elections and has not curbed outside spending. Ballots are due by 8 p.m. Tuesday.

Olson pointed out the vouchers have succeeded in encouraging more diverse participation in local elections.

"The intention of the program was to bring a public financing program to Seattle elections to help empower more candidates -- more diverse candidates, women, renters, people of color -- to have equal access to be able to run, and run competitive elections without having to rely on wealthy donors, special interests," Olson emphasized.

Olson noted because the money comes from a dedicated tax levy, unused vouchers roll over to the next election.

"The goal isn't to create an unlimited pot of money but to be able to provide resources for candidates to run with the community's support," Olson stressed. "But it's not a blank check at the same time."

Eric Tegethoff is a journalist covering the Northwest for Public News Service.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi
- YouTube

Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's interview series engages diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This initiative is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

The latest interview in this series features Rahmin Sarabi, founder and Director of the American Public Trust, an organization dedicated to promoting and implementing deliberative democracy practices, such as citizen assemblies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”

President Donald Trump finally acknowledged there is “real starvation” in Gaza—a reality that has generated momentum among holdout countries to recognize a State of Palestine, as 147 of 193 U.N. members have already done. Trump claims that this impermissibly “rewards Hamas.” Concerns about the optics of “rewarding” a militant group that is not the country’s government should not drive the decision to recognize Palestine as a state or the decision to maintain diplomatic relations with its government.

Countries that have already recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and the fact that the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) forms a defined geographic area with a government and a population—the traditional criteria for statehood. Countries that have not recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) lack of effective control over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and to the idea that recognition can be used as future diplomatic leverage. But waiting to recognize a state of Palestine until after there is a negotiated agreement between Israel and the PA is an outdated position that amounts to “kicking the can” down an interminable road.

Keep ReadingShow less