Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Building a resilient democracy: Unmasking the true threats

Building a resilient democracy: Unmasking the true threats
Getty Images

Becvar serves as Chief Operating Officer of the Bridge Alliance.

In our highly charged political climate, the assertion that polarization is the most urgent issue facing America is a statement often heard (and repeated). But is it truly the crux of the matter?


The May newsletter from Horizons Project brought forward a perspective on this topic by offering reference to a podcast featuring Shannon McGregor called “Is this Democracy.” McGregor challenges the notion that polarization is the core problem, suggesting instead that the major threat to American democracy lies in the radicalizing right. By labeling polarization as the main issue, we may be taking an easy way out, avoiding the critical examination of the actual problem at hand, and fostering an unhealthy rhetoric of reconciliation.

On the latest “How Do We Fix It?” podcast, Bill Shireman discussed the notion that the majority of common-sense voters defy the prevailing divided paradigm. Their discussion highlighted how the recent debt ceiling compromise highlighted that party leaders could work together when necessary, even while their members fan the flames of partisan blame. Similarly, the Democracy Works podcast delved into the perverse incentives and resulting behaviors within the current political system that significantly challenge democracy. Addressing this challenge requires the dedication of public servants and constituents who reject candidates playing games with the well-being of our nation.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Acknowledging the radicalizing aspect of some of America’s political right, anti-Trump conservatives have taken action. In a featured piece in The Fulcrum, David L. Nevins highlights the efforts of organizations like the Renew America Movement, Stand Up Republic, RePAIR, and The New Conservatives Summit. Moreover, Republican lawmakers supporting the For Our Freedom Amendment were recently highlighted by American Promise. The Election Reformers Network reminds us that we can’t always assume the worst about political actors, as evidenced by Republicans’ involvement in the Electoral Count Reform Act. However, recent legislative actions by Texas Republicans on election rules serve as a stark reminder of the challenges we continue to face.

At the Bridge Alliance, we firmly believe that there is no single solution to cure the ailments of our democracy. A recent study by More in Common, reported by the American Values Coalition, revealed that correcting misperceptions about those from the “other party” reduced partisan animosity - but the effect disappeared within a week. This study reinforces the importance of adopting a multi-level approach to address these issues. We need dedicated leaders, and constituents must demand more from them.

Democracy relies on an informed and engaged citizenry, making civic education key to a democratic future. It empowers individuals to evaluate information critically and demand better news reporting. Engaging in conversations with those outside our comfort zones is vital to becoming better civic stewards. Applying hard-earned insights from the peacebuilding and mediation field is essential to be effective. We also need structural changes in how and with what funding we elect our representatives to ensure a healthy democracy.

Fortunately, our nation has a growing and dynamic ecosystem of individuals and organizations tirelessly working towards shared goals. They continue to persevere despite facing backlash and personal risk, driven by their determination to build a stronger democracy for all. Most importantly, they demonstrate that addressing the underlying issues, rather than risking complacency by labeling them all as simply ‘polarization,’ is essential. Only by confronting the genuine threats to our democracy can we pave the way for a more resilient and healthy democratic future.

Read More

Large Bipartisan Majorities Oppose Deep Cuts to Foreign Aid

The Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland releases a new survey, fielded February 6-7, 2025, with a representative sample of 1,160 adults nationwide.

Pexels, Tima Miroshnichenko

Large Bipartisan Majorities Oppose Deep Cuts to Foreign Aid

An overwhelming majority of 89% of Americans say the U.S. should spend at least one percent of the federal budget on foreign aid—the current amount the U.S. spends on aid. This includes 84% of Republicans and 94% of Democrats.

Fifty-eight percent oppose abolishing the U.S. Agency for International Development and folding its functions into the State Department, including 77% of Democrats and 62% of independents. But 60% of Republicans favor the move.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Super Bowl of Unity

A crowd in a football stadium.

Getty Images, Adamkaz

A Super Bowl of Unity

Philadelphia is known as the City of Brotherly Love, and perhaps it is fitting that the Philadelphia Eagles won Sunday night's Super Bowl 59, given the number of messages of unity, resilience, and coming together that aired throughout the evening.

The unity messaging started early as the pre-game kicked off with movie star Brad Pitt narrating a moving ad that champions residence and togetherness in honor of those who suffered from the Los Angeles fires and Hurricane Helen:

Keep ReadingShow less
The Paradox for Independents

A handheld American Flag.

Canva Images

The Paradox for Independents

Political independents in the United States are not chiefly moderates. In The Independent Voter, Thomas Reilly, Jacqueline Salit, and Omar Ali make it clear that independents are basically anti-establishment. They have a "mindset" that aims to dismantle the duopoly in our national politics.

I have previously written about different ways that independents can obtain power in Washington. First, they can get elected or converted in Washington and advocate with their own independent voices. Second, they can seek a revolution in which they would be the most dominant voice in Washington. And third, a middle position, they can seek a critical mass in the Senate especially, namely five to six seats, which would give them leverage to help the majority party get to 60 votes on policy bills.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Bureaucrat’s Dilemma When Dealing with a Charismatic Autocrat

A single pawn separated from a group of pawns.

Canva Images

The Bureaucrat’s Dilemma When Dealing with a Charismatic Autocrat

Excerpt from To Stop a Tyrant by Ira Chaleff

In my book To Stop a Tyrant, I identify five types of a political leader’s followers. Given the importance of access in politics, I range these from the more distant to the closest. In the middle are bureaucrats. No political leader can accomplish anything without a cadre of bureaucrats to implement their vision and policies. Custom, culture and law establish boundaries for a bureaucrat’s freedom of action. At times, these constraints must be balanced with moral considerations. The following excerpt discusses ways in which bureaucrats need to thread this needle.

Keep ReadingShow less