Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Moving beyond divisiveness: Building a stronger republic

Moving beyond divisiveness: Building a stronger republic
Getty Images

Kristina Becvar is the Chief Operating Officer of the Bridge Alliance.

“It’s not a democracy.”


The above provocative statement was the first comment made on a social media post Monday sharing this week’s Fulcrum post on Juneteenth and the intersection of art, politics, and American identity. The comment accomplished exactly what it was intended to do - completely ignoring the content of the article, a nuanced discussion of how art and politics reflect each other, and instead making a declarative statement that is divisive enough to make people think twice about engaging and effectively preventing conversation. That’s the power of the words we choose to use when discussing American politics, and social media has been an incubator for people to learn how to employ the red herring tactic of diverting attention from the real issue by focusing instead on a subject that has only a vague relevance, if any relevance at all, to the real issue. This technique allows the perpetrator to feel as if they “won” something in a discussion without having to get curious or engage in thoughtful deliberation.

Is the United States a democracy? Absolutely. Is it also a republic? Yes to that too. Our society is being conditioned to view those complementary concepts as opposing forces, the false dichotomy fueling tribalism and diverting attention from critical issues. Debating word choice in this manner is a tactic being spread by anti-democratic folks to shore up opposition to voting rights, voter access reforms, casting a shadow on movements that aim to strengthen democracy. Recognizing that a republic is a representative democracy, we must not let word choice distract us from the fundamental question: Does America truly function as a healthy representative democracy? A candid assessment reveals that there is work to be done. So how do we move past the playbook of using divisive words and tactics to derail discussions on how to make America live up to the best version of ourselves?

To navigate these challenges, we can draw inspiration from successful strategies implemented by democracies worldwide. The Election Reformers Network and the Alliance for Securing Democracy have recently released a report showcasing innovative approaches that can combat polarization and mistrust within democratic systems. By embracing these innovative ideas and adapting them to our unique context, we can forge a more inclusive and participatory society.

One of the pillars of work among many Bridge Alliance members is that of finding unity within divided communities, and we recognize that unity is often best achieved through local, community-based connections. Recognizing the significance of civic literacy, we acknowledge that quality discourse and informed citizens are essential for countering simplistic talking points and inflammatory rhetoric. By equipping ourselves with civic knowledge, we can strengthen the very foundations of our country. Our collective efforts can help us move beyond being pulled into the linguistic trenches and toward creating a future where America lives up to its fullest potential.

So, let us remain engaged and curious as we strive towards a stronger republic. By fostering unity, embracing innovation, and pursuing civic knowledge, we can build a more robust democracy that reflects the ideals upon which our nation was founded.


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less