Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Five bellwether moments from the ‘Unrig the System’ reformers convention

With almost 2,000 attendants from across the country, the Unrig Summit in Nashville over the weekend stands as the biggest public gathering to date of people interested in tackling the challenges of our current democracy.

After three days of speeches, panel discussions and nonprofit groups hawking their widely disparate ideas for "fixing the system," it was tempting to view the gathering as a cacophony of voices dissatisfied with the status quo – but nowhere close to a chorus behind a galvanizing solution. But these five moments stood out for sending important messages about the future of the fledgling democracy reform movement.


No. 5: Business in the tent

One of the best-attended panel discussions Saturday was led by a former Apple executive, Sarah Bonk, now working full time to sell the notion that the influence which corporate interests have over the government will only be weakened if a critical mass of American businesses conclude it's in their best interests to lessen their reliance on enormous political and lobbying spending in pursuit of profit targets.

Much of the energy for bettering the system undeniably comes from the political left, so it was a sobering moment for many in the audience to hear their passion will only get them so far unless the big corporate interests they so regularly disdain are willing to limit campaign and policy influence outlays.

No 4: One man's story

The notion that a more expensive democracy can deliver tangible benefits to people on society's margins was highlighted no more movingly than by Desmond Meade, whose narrative of grassroots political success after personal failing has made him a breakout star on the inspirational speaking circuit in the past year. He spent three years in prison for drug and weapons convictions before earning a law degree, but was able to register to vote in Orlando in January thanks to the Florida ballot initiative he helped steer to victory last fall as the head of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition.

The franchise for as many as 1.4 million other convicted felons in Florida is also supposed to be revived, but Meade was the one who had convention goers on their feet several times with his simple message that "love your neighbor as yourself" is the best slogan for democracy reform.

No. 3: Youth movement

Unrig attendees skewed decidedly older, whiter and richer than the national electorate. But a clear conference theme came from those people lamenting that their moment to secure a more functional and cleaner democracy may have passed their generation by – and counting on a younger and more ethnically diverse group of leaders to step up.

And several were on hand for prominent roles, including 22-year-old conservative environmental activist Benji Backer and Emma Gonzalez, one of the most politically active survivors of last year's mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla. She wowed the convention with a rousing call to set new limits on the flow of money in elections in order to limit the influence the National Rifle Association and other Second Amendment rights groups have on the congressional agenda.

No. 2: The unmentioned

At more than a dozen panel discussions and in several dozen speeches, the name of the incumbent president was not mentioned once. And of the handful of times Donald Trump was cited by grassroots activists, scholars and political players, it was a passing reference in almost each instance.

His almost complete absence from the conversation was a pointed reminder that, while most attendees clearly hold Trump himself responsible for a newfound rattling of democratic norms, the issues they came to deliberate in Nashville (the dominant role of money in politics, the shaky state of voting rights and the limits in electoral competition, principally) were hobbling the functionality of democracy long before this administration began – and ought to find a place on the national policymaking agenda no matter what happens in the 2020 election.

No. 1: The discordant finale

A we're-all-in-this-together spirit of collaboration and patient listening lasted until the final session, when a wave of discord generated the convention's most newsworthy and cautionary moment.

The marquee speaker of the weekend was former Starbucks CEO Howard Shultz, who is pondering generous spending from his own fortune to mount an independent run for president with good government reform as a campaign centerpiece. But he was hectored and booed unlike anyone else. A dozen attendees stood to derisively chant "Billionaires for president!" the first time he tried to talk, and then the room filled with catcalls and jeering when he sought to rebut the argument that his candidacy would at best be remembered as spoiling the chances for the Democratic nominee and assuring Trump's re-election. The rest of his speech was welcomed with tepid applause at best.

It hardly mattered that Schultz endorsed a favorite cause in the hall, using ranked-choice voting to break the Republican and Democratic duopoly on power, and frequently offered versions of "our democracy is being threatened by a rigged system" in taking about campaign financing.

In their lukewarm rebuff of Schultz, the activists who traveled to Nashville to lament the current state of democracy and deliberate all manner of aspirational "fixes" came off as much more interested in the pragmatics of the coming campaign than in rewarding a potential national figure for trying to speak their language.

(Full disclosure: The conference was organized byRepresentUs, which seeks to end "the legalized corruption that has come to define modern politics," but among the major sponsors was Issue One, the political advocacy group incubating The Firewall.)


Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less