Democratic political icon James Carville and former White House Chief of Staff (2017) and Republican National Committee Chairman (2011-2017) Reince Priebus sat down with USC students prior to the event, 'Finding Common Ground on the State of our Democracy' to answer questions, and share insights.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More
Equipping Local Leaders to Improve Civic Health & Transform Systems of Governance
Dec 31, 2024
The National Civic League and the Bridge Alliance are proud to announce the “The Healthy Democracy Project. This joint effort will work with two communities to build the skills of civic leaders and equip them with the tools they need to address important civic challenges. Through one year of work, these communities will have increased capacity for solving community problems through inclusive civic engagement.
Background
People have the capacity to work together, address their differences, make good public decisions, develop plans, and solve problems. This fact is not always apparent in the national headlines, but it is clear to many people who are active in their communities, and it is on display in the presentations every year at the All-America City Awards.
Unfortunately, our systems of governance currently make it harder, not easier, for people to work together, and they typically fail to engage all populations. Civic health is based on the quality of civic opportunities and the strength of civic infrastructure. When these supports are weak, people of different backgrounds and political perspectives are less likely to communicate or work together, which exacerbates partisan polarization. When these supports are distributed inequitably, they deepen economic and social inequities.
Civic health matters in other ways, too. Strong, ongoing connections between residents, robust relationships between people and public institutions, and positive attachments between citizens and the places they live are highly correlated with a range of positive outcomes, from better physical health to higher employment rates to better resilience in the face of natural disasters. In most places, there are a range of opportunities for people to engage, but they are often undervalued, overlooked, and disconnected from one another.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Many kinds of democracy innovations have emerged to transform systems of governance and, improve civic health, and engage a wider range of people. But most of them are temporary, ad hoc efforts – even when they are supported by public institutions, they are seldom incorporated into the official, ongoing ways that those institutions interact with citizens. In the world of civic innovation, a thousand flowers have bloomed; now, we need to do some gardening.
Project Components
The Healthy Democracy Project, which builds on the infrastructure provided by the Healthy Democracy Ecosystem Map, will support this civic gardening in communities across the country. Starting in two pilot communities, the Bridge Alliance and National Civic League will:
- Help identify and convene a set of civic leaders in that community, including people already in established decision-making positions and new leaders who are just starting to step forward. Each community cohort should be diverse in terms of age, race and ethnicity, sector, and political affiliation, with a particular emphasis on inclusion of underrepresented populations
- Conduct Civic Infrastructure Scans, using the Healthy Democracy Map as a starting point, to help leaders take stock of the history of engagement, levels of social capital and inclusion, and civic assets of their communities.
- Support skill development in collaborative leadership, deliberative dialogue, digital engagement, facilitation, civic measurement, relational organizing, cultural competence, outreach throughout the community, and other civic competencies.
- Provide training on and access to tools such as the Map, Engagement Scorecard, Text Talk Act, Civic Index, Perfect City’s participatory theater process, Better Neighbors Better Neighborhoods, Civic Health Action Guide, Guide to Local Civic Measurement, and other resources that help leaders understand their communities and engage fellow community members and regional partners.
- Assist leaders as they develop large-scale civic engagement processes that:
- Tackle a major local problem or policy decision – creating agency and power for citizens on the issues that most impact them.
- Build civic infrastructure and equity in the process.
The pilot communities will be chosen through a collaborative process, focusing on diverse mid-sized cities that offer the opportunity to engage distinct groups.
Outcomes
Through the Healthy Democracy Project, each community will have a stronger civic infrastructure, with a diverse cadre of community leaders who are better able to:
- Form and maintain cross-sector, multicultural leadership groups.
- Create investment strategies for sufficient local and national resources to scale and sustain the work in their community.
- Understand how media organizations can best engage and inform the public and reach all populations, and how the public can best support and engage media organizations ▪ Use the Healthy Democracy Map and other approaches to identify allies, survey their community’s civic infrastructure, and find compelling examples in other places
- Use attitudinal research tools to understand citizens’ preferences on ways to strengthen inclusive democracy.
- Engage large, diverse numbers of people in the development and implementation of plans to strengthen civic infrastructure and local democracy, with a particular emphasis on involving underrepresented populations.
In these polarized times, it is more important than ever for citizens to become engaged and feel they can make a difference. The Healthy Democracy Project will not only provide the tools needed to help civic leaders affect key issues facing their communities, it will also provide the inspiration, purpose, and belief they need to energize their fellow citizens.
Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
Photo by Behnam Norouzi on Unsplash
A Look Back At The Most Popular Stories of 2024
Dec 31, 2024
The Fulcrum is a trusted platform where insiders and outsiders to politics are informed, meet, talk, and act to repair our democracy.
We amplify marginalized perspectives through news articles, opinion pieces, and investigative reports. Thanks to our contributors, we foster an inclusive dialogue vital for a thriving democracy.
Here are the most popular stores published on The Fulcrum:
Kamala Harris is Black & Asian and Why Does Trump Care? kickstand/Getty Images
Kamala Harris is Black & Asian and Why Does Trump Care?
In 2024, 60 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, it is unfortunate that, because of statements made by a candidate for the presidency, we need to remind Americans that the color of one’s skin is a terribly unreliable indicator of one’s so-called racial heritage.
Project 2025: The Department of Veterans Affairs Air Force Reserve Command
Project 2025: The Department of Veterans Affairs
Project 2025, a conservative plan for a second Trump administration, aims to make the Department of Veterans Affairs more efficient and responsive, which is a commendable objective. But the focus on conservative political goals and extensive outsourcing risks politicizing the VA and potentially undermining its ability to serve veterans effectively.
In Trump v. United States, Chief Justice John Roberts produced an astonishing and convoluted treatise that denigrates a key principle of our jurisprudence championed by the founders, writes Toscano. Jacquelyn Martin-Pool/Getty Images
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Conservatives will rue the day they compromised the rule of law
Defenders of democracy had hoped the Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States would begin with the words “No man is above the law.” But Chief Justice John Roberts avoided the phrase entirely in his opinion. Instead, he produced an astonishing treatise that denigrates a key principle of our jurisprudence championed by the founders.
Defense Secretary Mark Esper (left) and other leaders stood up to Donald Trump when he was president. Trump would likely face similar resistance if he wins another term. Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images
What would really happen if Trump wins?
If Donald Trump wins, American democracy will undergo a severe stress test. Yet again. But it won’t plunge into dictatorship, authoritarianism or fascism. Instead, if Trump wins, America will have an incoherent and volatile mix of some government institutions that function democratically and some that don’t.
The speech Joe Biden won’t give Anadolu/Getty Images
The speech Joe Biden won’t give
If President Joe Biden reached out to independent voters in a way that legitimized their concerns about the self-serving nature of the Democratic and Republican parties, he could probably win with 60 percent of the vote. But he won’t. And neither will Donald Trump.
If Donald Trump implements the Heritage Foundation's policy plan, he'll take us down the path of authoritarianism, writes Corbin. Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images
Project 2025 is a threat to democracy
On Jan. 20, 2025, will the duly elected and inaugurated president of the United States keep America as a democracy that dates back to the 1630s or will the commander-in-chief start changing the country to authoritarian-fascism? That depends on whether Trump wins and he follows the Project 2025 playbook.
Latino-owned businesses, such as the Aztec Farmers Market in Houston, contribute billions of dollars to the economy each year. Raquel Natalicchio/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
Trump's right! A massive invasion is happening at the southern border
Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed an invasion is taking place on the southern U.S. border. He is absolutely right. But it's not an invasion of people taking over cities and jobs, it's an invasion of communities playing a significant role in shaping the cultural, social and economic landscape of the United States.
If Trump wins, should Democrats turn over the keys to the White House? Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images
If Trump wins, should Democrats turn over the keys to the White House?
The Democrats, believing Donald Trump is a threat to democracy, have few options if he wins, and none of them are good. A Trump victory will force our leaders and all of us to confront a series of tragic choices.
Was Trump right when he said he could ‘shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters’? MEGA/Getty Images
Has 'just about every law enforcement agency in the country' endorsed Donald Trump for president in 2024?
Former President Donald Trump claims he is “supported by just about every law enforcement agency in the country; I think, maybe every one.” But police unions — not law enforcement agencies such as police or sheriff’s departments — endorse candidates.
Tracy Chapman and Luke Combs perform "Fast Car" at the Grammys. Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Recording Academy
Luke Combs, politics and healing our nation's divide
Today's pop artists can have tremendous influence on politics and poltiical divide, if only more of them were willing to speak out.
Keep ReadingShow less
Legislative imagination must match the significance of AI
Dec 31, 2024
In 1933, Dr. Francis Townsend penned a Letter to the Editor for the Long-Beach Press-Telegram. His radical, simple idea--to give $200 a month (now, about $4,800) to seniors, on the condition that they spend it all before their next payment--spawned one of the largest citizen movements the nation had experienced up to that point. A congressional caucus was even formed in response to the movement. Soon, states took up similar proposals, such as the “Ham and Eggs” initiative in California, which would have provided each resident over 50 with $30 per week. Though the Townsend Plan and its state equivalents failed, the Social Security Act may not have been passed nor later amended to be made stronger if it were not for this one doctor’s letter and the movement it inspired.
How best to ensure the economic resilience of Americans is again atop Congress’s agenda and at the center of the presidential election. This is unsurprising, given public concern about the state of the economy. More than a third of Americans identify economic issues as the main problem facing the country. This sizable coalition has remained consistent for more than two years, which suggests that piecemeal progress in addressing economic instability has not alleviated the public’s worries.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Forecasts of ongoing economic uncertainty suggest that the public will remain interested in any and all proposals to increase both the nation’s financial footing as well as their individual economic security. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and its rapid adoption across numerous professions justify continuing unease. Early signs of economic chaos brought on by AI have already appeared. Video game makers, for example, have slashed their workforces. Artists, musicians, and other content creators have warned that they’re experiencing dips in business. So far, the proposed solutions have been partial and insignificant. Some states, for instance, have passed legislation to reduce the use of digital replicas that might cut into the potential earnings of performers. Such targeted legislation, while necessary, lacks breadth and boldness.
The scale of our legislative imagination must match the significance of technological, social, and economic changes already underway. Few doubt that AI is indeed heralding a new era. Life in just a few years will likely look remarkably different. AI agents--think AI systems that can act on your behalf, proactively accomplish tasks, and pursue long-term goals--will upend many daily activities and, by extension, many jobs and companies. Rather than get caught flat-footed by these changes, we need creative ideas of how to maintain and protect our core values, norms, and institutions. The bare minimum is the sort of status quo legislation we’ve seen in various states. We can, should, and must dream bigger.
AI is already creating new classes of haves and have-nots. The divide between these two groups will increase if inaction or insignificant solutions remain the norm. Now is the time to think about novel ways to empower and support those who find themselves on the wrong side of innovation. What new institutions, supports, and opportunities will we create so that more people and more communities thrive rather than merely survive in the age of AI?
I have offered a few of my own ideas via other essays and articles. You should do the same--now is the time as DC is soon to experience a change of hands. Without people like Dr. Townsend daring to share their novel solutions, we may have never realized a better future.
Frazier is Adjunct Professor at Delaware Law and Affiliated Scholar in Emerging Technology and Constitutional Law at St. Thomas University College of Law.
Keep ReadingShow less
We need a "children-first" approach to the digital world
Dec 31, 2024
On a recent appearance on the Team Never Quit podcast, I described the internet broadly and social media more specifically as a “democracy-killing force.” This wasn't hyperbole. The scope, scale, and speed with which the all-consuming Big Tech wave has unmoored us from ourselves, each other, and reality has been unprecedented in human history.
The heart of democracy is a government that operates "for the people" and "by the people" — upholding the highest levels of individual and collective freedom for its citizenry. It also, above all else, promotes "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." This incredibly precious and audaciously ambitious mandate of our founding fathers is one that every generation has carried forward with a ruthless commitment to the American experiment: a commitment underwritten with sweat, tears, and blood.
What makes America so powerfully unique is its fundamental commitment to human flourishing: the ability to live by your own values, to strive, to grow, to fail, to love, and to drive onward the human race. American democracy is the means, and our people are the primary and only end.
And yet, we have allowed a rapacious tech ecosystem to undermine the heart of who we are — our commitment to human flourishing — and, much more concerningly, to undermine the promise of America for our youngest citizens.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
In the early 2000s and into the early 2010s, we used the term "internet culture." At the earliest stages of the digital movement, we broadly recognized that there was something distinct and different — and above all, not good — about this new online world. Technology has the dubious distinction of taking the worst of the human race and amplifying and elevating it into the mainstream. Anger, spite, outrage, narcissism, naked ambition, and outright sociopathy are the hallmarks. To succeed in the online world often requires taking on the worst of humanity.
Today, there's no relevant use of the term "internet culture" because the digital world is now so entangled with every aspect of our lives that we can just call it "culture." As part of this culture, children are introduced to a virtual world designed to productize them, rob them of time and purpose, and teach them that vanity, reactivity, and superficiality are the new foundations of success. These platforms hook them to a system that defines their self-worth according to how much of themselves they willingly give over to attention-driven profit machines and undercuts the democracy-critical concept of service before self.
The statistics are stark. According to Pew Research, 95% of U.S. teens report having access to a smartphone, and nearly half say they are online "almost constantly." That means in-person interactions – the ones that help us learn and grow as people – are rapidly being replaced. Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt's research reveals the devastating consequences: Between 2010 and 2015, rates of depression among teen girls rose by 65%. Teen suicide rates, particularly among girls, saw the steepest increase in history - jumping 70% in the years between 2010 and 2017. Research shows that teens who spend five or more hours daily on social media are twice as likely to report depression and anxiety symptoms compared to their peers. Even more troubling, emergency room visits for self-harm among girls aged 10-14 tripled between 2010 and 2014. The correlation between this pervasive digital presence and the collapse of youth mental health is impossible to ignore.
Modern social media platforms function essentially as "digital narcotics," employing sophisticated algorithms deliberately engineered to create dependency and expose young users to content that often exceeds age-appropriate boundaries. Users are siloed into specific, niche ways of thinking – with content that confirms certain worldviews and demonizes others. This dynamic plants the seeds of division early, perpetuating a cycle of polarization that becomes increasingly entrenched as digital dependency grows.
The issue runs deeper than just content or screen time. As Nicholas Carr argues in The Shallows, the very nature of digital platforms reshapes how we think and process information. The constant notifications, infinite scrolling, and rapid context-switching aren't just distracting our youth – they're rewiring their neural pathways. Marshall McLuhan's famous insight that "the medium is the message" proves prophetic here: regardless of what content children consume online, the fragmented, dopamine-driven nature of social media platforms themselves is transforming how young minds develop. Traditional activities that build empathy and understanding – like sustained face-to-face conversations or cooperative communal or team-oriented activities – are being displaced by an environment that rewards quick judgments and tribal thinking and undercuts the democracy-critical concept of service before self.
If we are polarized now, just imagine what those divisions could look like in 10 or 15 years when digitally native children, who have been steeped in specific ways of thinking for their whole lives, grow into adults. The implications for democracy are chilling.
Addressing this concerning trajectory requires more than simple screen-time restrictions. Parents increasingly find that establishing healthy digital boundaries proves challenging, as these platforms are specifically designed to capture and maintain attention. For this reason, this issue can't be fully solved on an individual basis. We need societal-level solutions.
First and foremost, the government can and should hold Big Tech companies accountable for the pervasive harm they caused. Connecting with others, shopping, getting directions, and gathering information online should not come with screen addiction, emotional dysregulation, overexposure, and other more sinister online threats for ourselves — and certainly not for our children.
Common sense restrictions around social media for young people have already taken off in other countries around the world. Australia, for example, just banned social media for all kids under 16. Similar restrictions have gained traction in the United States, such as The Kids Online Safety Act (which was recently stalled but not before it gained massive bipartisan support from legislators on both sides of the aisle having passed the Senate 91-3).
Beyond governmental intervention, the private sector must evolve. Technology leaders and entrepreneurs should adopt a "children-first" development philosophy, prioritizing youth well-being throughout the design and development process, rather than treating it as an ancillary consideration.
We stand at a critical inflection point with the rise of artificial intelligence. If we continue down our current path, AI will amplify and accelerate the destructive dynamic of our digital ecosystem. Recommendation engines will become even more sophisticated at hijacking attention, digital experiences will become more immersive and addictive, and the distance between our children and authentic human experience will grow ever wider. This is not inevitable.
With thoughtful, child-first implementation, AI could instead become a powerful force for human flourishing. We can harness this technology to create digital spaces that foster genuine connection, reward cooperation over conflict, and support the development of the skills and values democracy requires. The choice — and responsibility — is ours.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Our democracy's survival depends on our ability to raise generations capable of thoughtful dialogue, critical thinking, and genuine human connection. By dismantling the divisive infrastructure of digital dependency and reconstructing the foundations of empathy and understanding, we can ensure that our children inherit not just a functioning democracy, but one that truly embodies the ideals of human flourishing our founders envisioned.
The time for half-measures has passed. To save America and ourselves, we must fix the internet for our children. Our democratic future depends on it.
-
Josh Thurman is the COO and Co-Founder of Angel Kids AI, and a highly decorated Navy SEAL
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More