Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Vermont is poised to make history by being the last state to make history

Vermont is poised to make history by being the last state to make history

Originally published by The 19th.

Vermont is on the cusp of history this year as it prepares to almost certainly send a woman to Congress for the first time — the last state in the country to do so.


State Sen. Becca Balint and Lt. Gov. Molly Gray are the top Democratic contenders in the Tuesday primary for a rare open U.S. House seat, which is being vacated by Democratic Rep. Peter Welch. Welch is running for an open Senate seat after Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy announced his retirement last year.

Republicans Ericka Redic and Anya Tynio, both women, are also running. But whoever wins the Democratic primary is favored to win in the general election, likely putting an end to a distinction that Vermont has had to itself after Missippippi elected Republican Cindy Hyde-Smith to the U.S. Senate in 2018.

“Honestly, I think it has become a source of some embarrassment,” said Elaine Haney, executive director of Emerge Vermont, a Democratic candidate training program with chapters around the country. “Vermont is actually on the vanguard of so many things. … To find ourselves last on the list of this particular statistic is disturbing to some Vermonters. It’s not a reputation we want to have. So everybody definitely has a sense of, ‘It’s about time.’”

People who follow Vermont politics closely say it’s taken so long for the state to elect a woman to Congress because the state’s Washington delegation is only three people, creating fewer opportunities for women to compete than in bigger states.

The other key factor in Vermont is that the same elected officials — all White men — have repeatedly sought reelection. Research shows incumbency helps determine reelection for a candidate in office. Welch was elected to the House in 2006 after U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, left the chamber after eight terms to run for the Senate. Leahy was first elected to the Senate in 1974.

“The incumbency advantage is enormous,” said Garrison Harrison, professor emeritus of law, politics and political behavior at the University of Vermont.

Or as Jim Dandeneau, executive director of the Vermont Democratic Party, put it: “Vermont really loves its incumbents. … That makes it hard to break through.”

Balint, 54, has leaned into her legislative experience in making her pitch to voters. She is a former middle school teacher who was elected to the statehouse in 2014 and is Senate president pro tempore, the top position in the chamber. She said despite those credentials, some potential voters, particularly men, have questioned her experience on the campaign trail.

“They’ll literally say things to me like, ‘Don’t get me wrong. I want to like you and I think I do, but I just need to know, do you know what you’re getting into?’” Balint told The 19th. “It’s like a ‘little lady’ kind of thing.”

That experience tracks with new research from the Barbara Lee Family Foundation, which released a report earlier this year that found when two women run against each other, voters demand to know why either woman is qualified.

Amanda Hunter, executive director of the foundation, said there had been an assumption that a two-woman race would cancel out some of the barriers that women face when they run against men. Instead, they still have to balance proving themselves and likability, she said. The organization is tracking several races across the country where women are running against each other, including for Congress and governor.

“I would imagine that both women have to over-communicate their accomplishments to voters in order to really stay on top of mind on why they are qualified for the position,” she said.

Gray, 38, was elected lieutenant governor in 2020 and has tried to highlight how her experience outside of elected office would be relevant to a job in Congress. She interned in Leahy’s Vermont office and worked for Welch in Washington. She also worked abroad for the International Committee of the Red Cross and as an assistant attorney general in Vermont.

“There are questions every day about whether or not I have the experience to be an effective leader in Congress. The questions around experience and qualifications are still questions that women get more regularly,” she said. “My hope is that we get to the place where we really can dive into the policies of candidates. … What is their past and current experience, what makes them qualified to lead on those policy areas, rather than, ‘Can they do it?’”

Recent polling shows Balint with a 42-point lead over Gray. Balint and Gray have garnered backing from different factions within the Democratic party even as they campaign on some similar policy issues, like protecting equality rights and providing paid leave and child care access. Sanders and Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts both endorsed Balint, with Sanders campaigning with Balint in the final days of the primary.

Madeleine Kunin, a Democrat and the first and only woman to serve as Vermont governor, has endorsed Gray. So has former Vermont Democratic Gov. Howard Dean. Leahy said he voted early for Gray.

Money has poured into the race, with each Democratic candidate raising nearly $1 million each during the cycle. Gray has criticized outside groups’ spending in the race, including more than $600,000 from LGBTQ+ and progressive political action committees in support of Balint’s candidacy.

Balint, who is gay and is Vermont’s first woman and first out leader of the state Senate, would also be the first out member of Congress to represent the state. She said that has significance for her since some people have advised her to not be as open about the life she shares with her wife and their two children.

“People who love me, and worry about me, have been wanting me to edit more of what I’m saying on the stump,” she said. “And those have been really, really hard conversations for me and my team, when we have people who love us and support us and they are concerned that Vermont is not ready for an out gay person in statewide office. And I think they’re wrong. I think Vermont is ready for it. But that’s been a little disheartening for sure.”

Gray said while the race has focused on policy issues, voters have also expressed excitement about the potential for history, especially in the final days of campaigning.

“2022 will always go down as the year where we changed the conversation and we gave women and girls across Vermont a real opportunity to see that participation is possible and that we can have a federal delegation that is representative of all of us,” she said.

Haney said the work of Emerge Vermont has been critical for ensuring that women candidates were in a position to compete for open seats for statewide and legislative office. Both Balint and Gray have completed Emerge training.

“We’re seeing a really big movement in Vermont of more and more women stepping up to run,” she said. “And my hope is that that trickles down to the local level … because that is where the bench starts.”


Read More

President Trump answers questions from reporters.

U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One on August 21, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s White House Press Ban Violates 1st Amendment

The principle is simple. Just like politicians are not supposed to pick their voters, government officials don’t get to pick the reporters who cover them.

If they did, the First Amendment would be meaningless. and we would no longer live in anything resembling a constitutional republic. That is why President Trump’s September 18 announcement that he is banning reporters from CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House is so dangerous.

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

The CLARITY Act crypto bill failed a procedural vote on Sept. 15, but it could return. Here's what it does, who would regulate crypto, and the Trump angle.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act, which failed in a procedural vote on Sept. 15, and a new venture by the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company made us think it was time to write about the cryptocurrency legislation. Even though it’s not currently active, the bill could come back.

Keep ReadingShow less
When Money Trumps Life

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly at U.N. Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City.

Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images

When Money Trumps Life

Last week at the United Nations, Donald Trump showed the world just how little he values human life. In a single speech, he rattled off a laundry list of “hoaxes” to write off: climate change, AI, “Russia hoax,” “Ukraine hoax,” and more. Climate change, AI, and modern warfare all pose existential threats to civilization as we know it, and yet our president seems hellbent on gaslighting our fears while accelerating problems that threaten our survival. What would make a person behave in such a self-sabotaging way? Well, perhaps we should, as they say, follow the money.

Earlier this month, the UN warned that Earth is already 1.4°C hotter than before the industrial age and set to blow past the 1.5°C limit in the next few years. The World Health Organization projects that such warming will cause roughly 250,000 additional deaths a year starting in 2030. Any leader who values human life should recognize this as the existential threat it is and change course. Instead, Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the UN's founding climate treaty, and his EPA scrapped the scientific finding underpinning federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, in the first six months since launching his war in Iran, Trump's nine largest oil and gas holdings gained up to $4.4 million.

Keep ReadingShow less
 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Pool/Getty Images

How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

Keep ReadingShow less