Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voters must hold politicians accountable

Voters must hold politicians accountable

US Representative George Santos (R-NY) sits in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2023, ahead of US President Joe Biden's State of the Union address.

Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

As often happens these days, last week a friend of mine was quite angry by something his member of Congress did and vented his dissatisfaction to me:


“The problem with Congress is that these bums are accountable to no one. They do whatever they want and get away with it. If I acted like them at my job I’d be fired.”

My general feeling about the high level of dysfunction and lack of accountability by our elected representatives is pretty low so it was easy for me to support my friend as he vented. But upon further reflection, the concept of “accountability” as related to the function of our government intrigued me.

The first thing that popped into my head was my parents teaching me the importance of being accountable for my actions. I was taught at an early age that my actions have consequences for myself and others. Understanding the importance of acknowledging when I made a mistake was a hallmark of my upbringing.

And of course there were consequences. If I was bad I would be deprived of something. In school if I did something bad I was admonished with a warning from my teacher that my behavior would be on my permanent record.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

As I reflected, I realized these basic principles of personal responsibility that we expect of our children are rarely expected or enforced upon our elected representatives. Lying seems to be acceptable, since of course all politicians lie, and abhorrent behavior is excused because the ends justify the means. As tribalism and partisanship ramps up it is so much easier for politicians to reject any responsibility for the consequences of their words, personal behavior, and decisions.

Ideally I would hope that our leaders would meet the highest standards of accountability. However, this is simply not the case. Instead, all too often they deflect and place blame on their opponents, the media or anyone they can rather than accept individual responsibility.

In theory, in a representative republic such as ours our elected representatives are accountable to the American people since their job is dependent on the support of the people.

Thomas Paine recognized this at the time of our nation's founding when he said:

A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.”

Unfortunately, throughout our history voters simply have proven not to care or believe themselves unable to hold politicians to account. A free press is one of our most sacred freedoms since information is vital to holding elected representatives accountable. Yet in the high tech social media world of today sorting through what is fact based versus political rhetoric requires a level of inquiry and thought that most Americans simply choose not to do. Many of us are abandoning our civic responsibility to stay informed and thus perhaps are getting what we deserve.

After all, for democracy to succeed it must not be a spectator sport.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention The Government Accountability Office (GAO). This investigative arm of Congress and the congressional watchdog theoretically supports the Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibility of acting for the benefit of the American people but has no real power as Congress ignores many of their recommendations. Additionally, rarely are GAO’s ignored recommendations reported in the press.

What is publicized are the countless partisan Congressional hearings in which members of Congress do what they do best; voice outrage about the actions of other members of Congress or those in the executive branch. Rather than building effective mechanisms of accountability that advance government effectiveness, resolve present problems or prevent future malfeasance, in the end most hearings become a theater of the absurd in which the party in power uses this exercise in accountability for political gain. We have devolved to reward performative, rather than substantive efforts. The party in power controls the hearings and thus uses the hearings as a powerful communications tool to shape their agenda as an opportunity to seek revenge against the minority party who did the same thing to them when they were the majority. This endless cycle continues.

The lack of accountability problem is enhanced by a system that does not put voters first. Gerrymandering in the United States has resulted in most members of Congress being virtually immune from voters holding them accountable. Polls consistently show that while a vast number of Americans think Congress is dysfunctional, 90% of members of Congress still get re-elected. And the parties have, in most states, discarded any attempts at citizen drawn legislative maps; in essence picking their voters. This must change so voters come first and politicians have the incentives to act responsibly.

The level of absurdity related to accountability has reached new highs with the election of Congressman George Santos from New York who is almost unanimously considered to be a liar and total fraud, yet he still serves in Congress without any apparent move to sanction him.

Of course Santos is not alone. President Trump lied so much that a truth index was created to count the number of lies he made monthly and of course that was dismissed by supporters who rationalized this lack of accountability by saying, “well, all politicians lie.” Trump brazenly, and without shame, took lying to a new level; in plain view for all to see. He has yet to be held accountable.

As we think about the lack of accountability by politicians perhaps we should do some self reflection. Are politicians merely a reflection of a larger lack of accountability in today’s society? A Pew research report finds that Americans struggle with truth, accuracy and accountability. The 2019 report finds that “America is experiencing a crisis in facts and truth, and they believe this problem ties into the current state of distrust people have in institutions.”

In my next writing I will explore the extent to which accountability in America has declined or changed and to what extent that change impacts our democratic republic. There is no doubt being accountable for our actions is not easy. It requires mindfulness, honesty, and acceptance of others. And oftentimes requires courage and what might be called courageous accountability.

Read More

People holding signs against Project 2025 and Donald Trump

Protestors rally against Project 2025 and Donald Trump in New York's Times Square.

Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Project 2025: How anti-trans proposals could impact all families

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Willie Carver has been a teacher in Kentucky since 2007, now working with college students. For over two years, he has worked with the American Federation of Teachers’ National LGBTQ+ Task Force, an advocacy arm of the influential labor union created to counter the rise and repression brought by anti-LGBTQ+ laws.

One of the country’s most draconian anti-trans measures became law in Carver’s home state last March. The law has required teachers to put politics before the wellbeing of their own students and reshaped how students see and treat each other. It bans them from being taught about gender identity or sexual orientation, using restrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identity and learning about human sexuality. The law also made gender-affirming care illegal for trans youth.

Keep ReadingShow less
Perston holding a sign that reads "Project 2025 is Christian nationalism"

Opponents of Project 2025 hold a rally at Times Square on July 27.

Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Project 2025: A blueprint for Christian nationalist regime change

Casey is a former editorial writer for The New York Times and has worked with the Kettering Foundation since 2010.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross-partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 is a “presidential transition project” created as a blueprint for recruitment and indoctrination should Donald Trump become the next president. The plan calls for establishing a government that would be imbued with “biblical principles” and run by a president who holds sweeping executive powers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium

Former President Donald Trump's campaign exploits racist dog whistles, demonizing immigrants and endorsing white nationalist rhetoric, writes Johnson.

Adam J. Dewey/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Contending with whiteness in 2024

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 presidential campaign is shaping to be a racial reckoning for America.

With Vice President Kamala Harris positioned to shatter the glass ceiling as the first woman and person of color in the Oval Office and Donald Trump's candidacy fanning the flames of racial hatred, the election is laying bare the nation's ongoing struggle with whiteness and racial justice. As a pastor and advocate for racial reconciliation, I believe this moment will test our democracy's commitment to liberty and justice for all.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu, Andrew Leyden/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Where Harris, Trump stand on issues is less important than you think

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

Candidates for president of the United States typically run for office as though they were running for prime minister in a parliamentary democracy where their own party would have a clear majority in parliament. In such systems, which make up the vast majority of democracies in the world, the prime minister has enormous power to set policy.

In the United States, you would think that presidents are prime ministers because they always talk about what "I" will do as president based on where "I" stand on a great range of issues. While the president admittedly has much more power to set foreign policy, all major domestic policies must be passed by Congress. Indeed, Congress makes laws, while the president and the Cabinet execute them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young man looking angry at display of his smartphone.

The inflammatory rhetoric, meaningless speculation and lack of fact checking by the media may result in young adults rejecting traditional platforms in favor of their well-being.

urbazon/Getty Images

By focusing on outrage, the media risks alienating younger audiences

Rikleen is executive director of Lawyers Defending American Democracy and the editor of “Her Honor – Stories of Challenge and Triumph from Women Judges.” Beougher is a junior at Amherst College and a co-founder ofStudents Strengthening American Democracy.

As attacks on democracy and the rule of law continually increase, much of the media refuses to address its role in intensifying the peril.

Instead of asking hard questions and insisting on answers, traditional media outlets increasingly trade news and facts for speculative commentary that ignores a story’s contextual significance. At the same time, social media outlets and influencers stoke anger as an alternative to thoughtfulness.

Keep ReadingShow less