Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Blind voters sue for easier balloting in two states

Disabled voting

Lawsuits have been filed this week in North Carolina and Virginia in an attempt to make it easier for people with disabilities, like the voter above, to cast their ballots in the fall election.

Darren McCollester/Getty Images

With the presidential election now fewer than 100 days away, courthouses across the country are continuing to process a record flood of litigation hoping to improve access to voting during the coronavirus pandemic.

This week legal actions were filed in New York to extend the deadline for registration, and in both Virginia and North Carolina to improve the ability of blind citizens to vote from home.

Success for any of those lawsuits would likely increase turnout, but the only place where the extra voters might prove dispositive is North Carolina, where both the presidential and Senate contests look to be tossups. The other two states seem solidly blue.

These are the details of the cases:


New York

The American Civil Liberties Union and its affiliate state group asked a judge late Tuesday to block enforcement of the law ending voter registration 25 days before an election. Only 15 states have even earlier deadlines.

As part of the ACLU's ongoing state lawsuit against the Board of Elections, it asked the court to allow registration until Oct 24, or 10 days before the election, in line with four other states. (Nineteen states allow registering at the polls.)

In the last presidential race, the plaintiffs said, about 93,000 New Yorkers could not vote because they registered after the deadline.

"This November's election is one of the most important in our lifetimes, and it is more urgent than ever that no New Yorker is needlessly barred from participating," said Donna Leiberman, executive director of the New York ACLU.

Virginia

Two disability advocates and voters filed a federal lawsuit Monday to block absentee voting procedures they argue are discriminatory against the blind.

The National Federation of the Blind of Virginia and the American Council of the Blind of Virginia argue their members are not able to independently mark a paper ballot and that violates the 30-year-old Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit says this leaves disabled voters having to risk their health to vote in person. It argues that a secure email system for military and overseas citizens to vote is already available, but election officials refuse to let disabled voters use it.

North Carolina

Another federal lawsuit filed Monday makes similar arguments to the one in Virginia.

It states that blind and visually impaired North Carolinians will be forced to either risk getting the coronavirus, by voting in person, or to compromise their privacy and tell someone else who they want to vote for so that person can fill out the paper ballot.

The suit filed Monday says several states including Maryland, Wisconsin, New Hampshire and Oregon have all developed electronic methods for disabled citizens to vote absentee.

An estimated 300,000 North Carolinians had a visual disability in 2016, according to the National Federation of the Blind.

Among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Disability Rights North Carolina and the North Carolina Council of the Blind.


Read More

Trials Show Successful Ballot Initiatives Are Only the Beginning of Restoring Abortion Access

Anti-choice lawmakers are working to gut voter-approved amendments protecting abortion access.

Trials Show Successful Ballot Initiatives Are Only the Beginning of Restoring Abortion Access

The outcome of two trials in the coming weeks could shape what it will look like when voters overturn state abortion bans through future ballot initiatives.

Arizona and Missouri voters in November 2024 struck down their respective near-total abortion bans. Both states added abortion access up to fetal viability as a right in their constitutions, although Arizonans approved the amendment by a much wider margin than Missouri voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rising Costs, Chronic Disease and AI: The Fight to Save U.S. Healthcare
Sure, political activism is good for the system. It's also good for your health.
Sure, political activism is good for the system. It's also good for your health.

Rising Costs, Chronic Disease and AI: The Fight to Save U.S. Healthcare

In most industries, leaders can respond quickly when market conditions change. Within months, companies can shrink or expand their workforces, adopt innovative technologies, and reconfigure operations.

Healthcare lacks such flexibility. It takes a decade to train new physicians. Hospitals take years to plan, fund, and build — years longer than it takes for basic infrastructure in other industries.

Keep ReadingShow less
People joined hand in hand.

A Star Trek allegory reveals how outrage culture, media incentives, and political polarization feed on our anger—and who benefits when we keep fighting.

Getty Images//Stock Photo

What Star Trek Understood About Division—and Why We Keep Falling for It

The more divided we become, the more absurd it all starts to look.

Not because the problems aren’t real—they are—but because the patterns are. The outrage cycles. The villains rotate. The language escalates. And yet the outcomes remain stubbornly the same: more anger, less trust, and very little that resembles progress.

Keep ReadingShow less