Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Virus alters more election rules, starting in New York

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo

Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced New York's primary would be postponed until June due to the coronavirus.

Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images

The state at the epicenter of the American coronavirus pandemic is now positioned to be the final big prize in the Democratic presidential race.

New York on Saturday became the 11th and by far the biggest state to postpone primaries during the peak of the Covid-19 outbreak. Such delays are just one example of the broad array of ways states are responding to the historic public health emergency.

Also over the weekend, a push intensified in the biggest battleground state, Florida, to expand voting by mail in time for November. One judge was pressed to ease the Arkansas absentee voting deadline, while another judge made it temporarily easier to get on the ballot with petitions in Virginia. But the obvious problems gathering signatures during mandatory social distancing prompted the end of a ballot referendum drive in Arizona.

Here are the latest developments:


New York

Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo postponed presidential voting until June 23 — eight weeks later than scheduled, and in line with the state's legislative and congressional primaries. He acted just before the state reported that 1,218 people had died and 9,517 people in the state were hospitalized with the virus, both figures far ahead of any other state's.

"I don't think it's wise to be bringing a lot of people to one location to vote, a lot of people touching one doorknob, a lot of people touching one pen," Cuomo said at a news conference.

The Board of Elections had explored the possibility of holding the primary on April 28 as scheduled but entirely by mail, but concluded that county elections offices were not capable of processing the deluge of paper ballots.

With 274 pledged delegates at stake, New York's primary is the second most consequential on the Democratic calendar. Ten other states with a combined 820 delegates have already delayed primaries, all but a couple of them until June as well: Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.

Virginia

A Richmond judge granted an emergency request to lower the number of signatures required to qualify for the ballot.

The decision resolves a request by Omari Faulkner, one of eight Republicans hoping to mount a longshot challenge to Democratic Sen. Mark Warner. He said that he was only able to get 3,769 signatures before the coronavirus shut him down — with another 6,000 to go. With the judge's approval, Virginia's signature requirement was lowered to 3,500, so Faulkner will be part of the June 9 Republican primary.

The judge's order did not eliminate the state's signature requirement in its entirety, though. The ruling only applies to Republicans running for the Senate this year — and the deadline for their petition signatures was last week.

Arkansas

A federal lawsuit filed ahead of runoffs Tuesday in a dozen counties asked the state to extend the deadline for accepting absentee ballots. State law mandates they be received by 7:30 p.m. Election Day, but the suit alleges this deadline "unconstitutionally burdens the rights of Arkansas voters, particularly black voters."

Christian Ministerial Alliance, a religious nonprofit organization, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund asked that deadline be extended by 10 days and that the state be ordered to tell voters they have more time.

Arkansa voters, the lawsuit asserts, "should not also be forced to make the untenable choice between their safety and potentially endangering the lives of others and exercising their fundamental right to vote."

Arizona

A third petition drive has been called off by groups hoping to get referendums on the statewide ballot in November.

The latest to be called off was the Arizona Right to Know Source of Campaign Contributions Initiative. The measure would compel the state to obtain and reveal the identities of people donating more than $5,000 to a campaign's media efforts.

The group's leader, former state Attorney General Terry Goddard, asked the Legislature to allow for signatures to be gathered online — noting that leeway has also been given to people circulating nominating petitions.

Florida

The state and national Democratic parties launched a text message campaign to get as many as 1 million party members to vote by mail in November, when the state's 29 electoral votes will be intensely contested by both nominees.

The state Republican Party has also made nearly 140,000 calls to voters about alternatives to in-person voting. Florida allows people to request an absentee ballot for each election without giving an excuse.

Read More

An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.
A pile of political buttons sitting on top of a table

Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.

Once again, politicians are trying to choose their voters to guarantee their own victories before the first ballot is cast.

In the latest round of redistricting wars, Texas Republicans are attempting a rare mid-decade redistricting to boost their advantage ahead of the 2026 midterms, and Democratic governors in California and New York are signaling they’re ready to “fight fire with fire” with their own partisan gerrymanders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

Wilson Deschine sits at the "be my voice" voter registration stand at the Navajo Nation annual rodeo, in Window Rock.

Getty Images, David Howells

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

On July 24, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Circuit Court order in a far-reaching case that could affect the voting rights of all Americans. Native American tribes and individuals filed the case as part of their centuries-old fight for rights in their own land.

The underlying subject of the case confronts racial gerrymandering against America’s first inhabitants, where North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting reduced Native Americans’ chances of electing up to three state representatives to just one. The specific issue that the Supreme Court may consider, if it accepts hearing the case, is whether individuals and associations can seek justice under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). That is because the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contradicting other courts, said that individuals do not have standing to bring Section 2 cases.

Keep ReadingShow less