Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Don’t be fooled: Most independents are partisans too

Opinion

Voting Booth

Christopher Devine argues, "What really matters is what political scientists like myself call your 'political identity' – your psychological attachment to a political group, such as a party or an ideological movement."

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Devine in an assistant professor of political science at the University of Dayton.

Will President Trump win reelection in 2020? To find out, you'd think you could just look up whether more Americans are registered as Republicans than Democrats.

But the truth is, it doesn't really matter which party you register with on paper. Besides, 19 states don't even register voters by party.

What really matters is what political scientists like myself call your "political identity" – your psychological attachment to a political group, such as a party or an ideological movement. That's why political science surveys ask people, "Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an independent, or what?"

This question aims to find out how you see yourself – essentially, which team are you on? This is how many people make sense of the political world.


According to Gallup, the identity that people choose most often is actually "independent" – not Democratic or Republican. In 2019, 42 percent of Americans chose this label, up from the low 30s just 15 years earlier.

However, three-quarters of these "independents" admit, when asked, that they lean toward favoring either the Democratic or Republican parties. Judging by how they vote or what they think of national political leaders, the truth is that these "leaners" really are partisans rather than independents. Apparently, many people who like to think of themselves as independent-minded and free of party influence aren't.

So, why call themselves independents? Typically, according to one leading study, it is "not because they disagree with the parties ideologically or politically but because being a party member is embarrassing."

In fact, only about 10 percent of Americans are what political scientists call "pure independents" – that is, people who identify as independents and claim not to favor either of the two major parties. Nor has that percentage grown in recent years. This means that the vast majority of Americans – consistently around 90 percent – are partisans, whether they like to admit it or not.

So which party do more Americans identify with – Democratic or Republican?

The Democratic Party, usually.

According to a Gallup poll in October, 47 percent of Americans either called themselves Democrats or admitted leaning toward the Democratic Party, versus 42 percent for Republicans and 11 percent independents. However, there are some signs that Republicans gained ground on Democrats in recent months.

Historically speaking, there have always been more Democrats than Republicans in the American electorate – with rare and very brief exceptions – ever since Gallup began polling party identification in the 1930s.

But identifying with a party is not the same as voting for it. Self-identified Democrats are less likely than Republicans to turn out to vote, particularly in midterm elections. This is because young people and other Democratic constituencies tend to be more engaged by the spectacle of a presidential election.

That should be good news for Democrats this year - since, in the 2018 midterms, they won back the House of Representatives. It figures that Democrats would be even more energized to defeat Trump this fall. Right?

Not so fast. Recently, Gallup asked Americans whether they are more enthusiastic about voting in 2020 than in previous elections. As it turns out, Republicans are just as enthusiastic about voting as Democrats. This is unusual. In previous elections, the party out of power always expressed more enthusiasm. But not this time. Now, partisans on both sides are highly energized.

The good news for Democrats is that there may be more of them to mobilize this year than there are Republicans. The bad news is that Republicans are united behind Trump – and ready to vote.

Will Democrats nominate a presidential candidate who can fire up their party's base, too? Chances are, that will matter more than winning over the small slice of American voters who don't identify with either party.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Click here to read the original article.

The Conversation


Read More

Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked

Analysis of California’s open primary system, political reform, and voter empowerment amid gubernatorial tensions and calls to restore party control.

zimmytws/Getty Images

California Schemin’

Both before and after Eric Swalwell’s resignation, the California Gubernatorial race has partisan insiders screaming that California’s innovative, voter-friendly, open primary system should be scrapped. Why? Seven Democrats and two Republicans are running. If all the Democrats stay in the race, and none surges, there is a statistical possibility that the two Republicans advance to the general election.

The attacks are pure opportunism, from people who oppose open primaries, period. Never mind that seven million independent voters have been enfranchised and elections are much more competitive, according to these critics, the fact that the Gubernatorial race might feature two Republicans is absolute proof that the old system needs to be restored.

Keep ReadingShow less
Official ballots with a chain and lock over them, and the USA flag behind them.

The impact of election fraud claims and voting laws on democracy in the United States. Daniel O. Jamison examines voter suppression concerns, mail-in ballot policies, and the broader political struggle over election integrity.

Getty Images, JJ Gouin

If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It

For nearly ten years, claims that our elections are riddled with fraud have threatened the foundation of our democratic republic.

It is alleged that Democrats have flooded the country with illegal immigrants who then illegally vote for Democrats. Purportedly to protect the country from this, Republicans seek legislation that would, among other provisions, restrict vote-by-mail, require potentially expensive and onerous proof of citizenship to register to vote, and require potentially expensive photo identification to vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

An in-depth interview with Elizabeth Rasmussen of Better Boundaries on Utah’s redistricting battle, Proposition 4, and the fight to protect ballot initiatives, fair maps, and democratic accountability.

The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

Since organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey has been the founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She regularly interviews colleagues in the world of democracy reform for The Fulcrum.

Elizabeth Rasmussen is the Executive Director for Better Boundaries, a Utah-based organization fighting for fair maps, defending the citizen initiative process, preserving checks and balances, and building a better future. Currently making headlines in the state, Better Boundaries is working to protect Proposition 4, and with it, the rights of Utah voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
A sign that reads, "Voter Registration," hanging from the cieling, pointing to an office with the words, "Voter registration," above its doorway.

The voter registration office at the Nueces County Courthouse in Corpus Christi, Texas on Sept. 11, 2024. Voting rights groups are challenging the state's use of a federal database to check the citizenship status of people on the state's voter roll.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Voting Rights Groups Challenge Texas’ Removal of Potential Noncitizens From the Voter Roll

What happened?

Voting rights groups are suing the Texas Secretary of State’s Office and some county election officials to prevent the removal of voters from the state’s voter roll based on use of a federal database to verify citizenship. They also claim the state failed to crosscheck its own records for proof of citizenship it already possessed before seeking to remove voters.

Keep ReadingShow less