Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

GOP has new election security bill for gridlocked House

Election security gridlock
stuartmiles99/Getty Images

House Republicans have proposed subjecting registration systems, electronic poll books and other election hardware to the same certification system that covers voting machines.

The legislation, introduced Wednesday, marks a rare if modest effort by the congressional GOP to impose more federal sway over the conduct of elections, which is largely left to the states and thousands of localities. It is almost certain to be ignored by the Democratic majority in the House, which is after much more comprehensive regulation.


The bill was proposed in the name of bolstering election security by Rodney Davis of Illinois, the GOP's senior member on the House Administration Committee, which has jurisdiction over election law, and the panel's two other Republicans.

It would be the first update of the law setting initial federal election standards, known as the Help America Vote Act, since its enactment almost two decades ago in response to the ballot disputes central to the intensely contested 2000 presidential election.

While the GOP measure has little chance in the House, it does contain some of the elements in the election security package, dubbed the SAFE Act, that Democrats pushed through the House with just a single GOP vote last summer. That legislation has not been considered in the Republican Senate.

Davis, with co-sponsorship of more than 50 fellow Republicans, introduced an election security bill last June that had some of the same elements as his new bill. His previous legislation also called for more transparency in reporting cases of hacking into election systems, among other provisions. No action has been taken on that bill.

Davis said his new measure would direct the Election Assistance Commission to establish an advisory committee on setting guidelines for non-voting election hardware — and then require the commission to write those guidelines.

While the voting equipment guidelines written and administered by the commission are legally voluntary, many states now require their own machines be certified to the EAC standards.

The bill would also establish a new office to connect state and local elections officials with election administration and cybersecurity experts from across the country.

Non-voting equipment includes electronic poll books used to check in people when they arrive a voting site; online voter registration databases, and election night reporting systems.

Some of these systems were targeted by Russian hackers during the 2016 election. One of their few successes was breaking into the voter registration database for the state of Illinois and viewing personal information of thousands of voters. No registrations were removed or changed.

Read More

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’
Independent Voter News

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’

The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project developed a “Redistricting Report Card” that takes metrics of partisan and racial performance data in all 50 states and converts it into a grade for partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign

America’s political system is broken — but ranked choice voting and proportional representation could fix it.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Election Reform Turns Down the Temperature of Our Politics

Politics isn’t working for most Americans. Our government can’t keep the lights on. The cost of living continues to rise. Our nation is reeling from recent acts of political violence.

79% of voters say the U.S. is in a political crisis, and 64% say our political system is too divided to solve the nation’s problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less