Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Local leaders key to transforming our democracy

Opinion

students voting

By appointing vote coordinators and other leaders on college campuses, we can transform student participation in elections, writes Clarissa Unger.

Joshua Lott/Stringer/Getty Images News

Unger is director of civic engagement for Young Invincibles , which seeks to mobilize young adults to advance solutions on higher education, health care, jobs and civic engagement.

Earlier this year, the House of Representatives passed legislation that would reform voting rights, campaign finance and government ethics. HR 1, the For the People Act, is widely regarded by democracy reform advocates as among the most important pieces of legislation since the Voting Rights Act. Importantly, the For the People Act includes a provision that would dramatically increase young adults' access to our registration and voting processes, transforming voter participation for years to come.

Building on a provision currently in the Higher Education Act, the For the People Act would ensure every college and university nationwide has a "campus vote coordinator" to answer students' questions about registering to vote, finding their polling location, and actually casting their ballot.

While this small step may ultimately seem insignificant, having a trusted messenger on campus to help students make their voices heard in an election makes sense when you consider the structural and psychological barriers students – who are often new to our voting process – face when voting. These challenges can include overestimating how long it takes to register, misunderstanding what they need to vote, or feeling that their vote will not impact the outcome of an election. All these barriers that can be overcome with the help of a trusted messenger.


The inclusion of a campus vote coordinator on every campus would be a significant shift in how we approach promoting voter participation. To this point, most research on voter participation focuses on tactics that campaigns can use to turn voters out on Election Day: how many doors to knock on or how many mailers need to be sent to increase turnout enough for a certain candidate to win. Meanwhile, the media focuses on the personalities on the ballot, not on the people fueling change in their communities.

While this campaign-focused knowledge is helpful in some ways, it doesn't address the bigger picture of how we can dramatically increase voter participation and truly transform our democracy. Focusing our attention and resources on a local civic leader – such as campus vote coordinator – challenges us to think about elections in new and more genuine and inclusive ways.

This movement toward empowering local leaders can bring sustainable change to our communities, and we've already seen this model work through the successes of the Students Learn Students Vote Coalition.

We launched the SLSV Coalition – the nation's largest nonpartisan student voting network – in 2016. With nearly 400 nonpartisan partners reaching over 1,600 colleges and universities in all 50 states, the coalition equips college administrators, professors, students, and campus leaders – or campus vote coordinators – with tools and resources to ensure that every eligible member of their campus community participates in elections.

The SLSV Coalition's work starts with the basic belief that rather than focusing on a single election or deadline like we've seen in the past, sustainable increases in voter participation come from local leaders who know their community best, have access to local social networks, and are most culturally equipped to lead the effort. We understand that every campus is different: They have different student populations, different resources available to them and different challenges. We know there is no one-size-fits-all approach to registering and turning out students to vote on campus.

Instead, we've found that there is a local leader in virtually every campus community who cares about ensuring that his or her students are able to register and cast their ballot. And we empower them with tools and resources to be an agent of change right in their community.

We've seen firsthand that the current political structures and systems discount the power these local leaders can have in their communities. But with their attention, knowledge and enthusiasm, we're seeing real progress in communities across the country.

In 2018 alone, the SLSV Coalition worked with local leaders on 316 campuses who committed to analyzing their student turnout data from previous elections, writing and implementing strategic plans, and registering and mobilizing their students to vote. Coalition members supported these leaders by providing access to data, networking, financing and policy tools they needed to succeed on their campus.

As part of this effort, the SLSV Coalition invested in developing statewide student democracy networks in eight states last year. These networks are anchored by statewide summits that bring together students, faculty members, campus administrators, election officials and nonprofit partners to share promising practices and coordinate efforts to overcome shared challenges like restrictive voter registrations policies or a lack of institutional commitment from their campus.

For instance, during our Texas Student Voting Summit, the SLSV Coalition first connected with enthusiastic student leaders and a campus administrator from Texas A&M International University in Laredo. By utilizing coalition resources – local student registration and turnout data, coaching to write a strategic plan for the election, and funding to implement the plan – turnout among young people of color in Webb County (home to Laredo) had a profound impact on statewide elections in the 2018 midterms.

That's what sets the SLSV Coalition approach apart: Rather than organizing around a single election or issue – or relying on short-term staff members who may only spend a few months mobilizing voters around a single campaign – we're investing in long-term solutions that empower each community's specific leaders to work toward ensuring everyone can vote.

Even more promising, we know there are local leaders stepping up for their communities outside of the higher education world as well. We've seen local leaders getting involved at high schools, within hospitals and religious institutions, through municipal governments, and more. The SLSV Coalition will continue providing these tools and resources for years to come because we know that these local leaders deserve our investment and attention every year.

With Congress also seemingly coming around on the ideas of investing in local leaders, we're moving closer to solutions that empower communities to make civic participation a way of life. In order to truly transform our democracy, close participation gaps, and increase overall turnout in our elections, we have to trust, empower and support local leaders.


Read More

Voters lining up to vote.

Voters line up at the Oak Lawn Branch Library voting center on Primary Election Day in Dallas on March 3, 2026. Republicans' decision to hold a split primary from the Democrats and to eliminate countywide voting forced Dallas County voters to cast ballots at assigned neighborhood precincts, leading to confusion. Republicans have now decided to use countywide polling locations for the May 26 runoff election.

Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune

Dallas County GOP Will Agree To Use Countywide Voting Sites for May 26 Runoff Election

Dallas County Republicans will agree to allow voters to cast ballots at countywide voting sites for the May 26 runoff election after a switch to precinct-based voting sites caused chaos, the county party chair said Tuesday.

Dallas County Republican Chairman Allen West supported the use of precinct-based sites earlier this month, but said using precincts again for the runoff would expose the county party to “increased risk and voter confusion” because the county is planning to use countywide sites for upcoming municipal elections and early voting.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less