Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

USA Today: Efforts to speed up ballot-counting stalled in key states

Days of election uncertainty may be a train wreck that everyone sees coming, but officials in the battleground states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania in Michigan don't seem any closer in making the changes needed to avert catastrophe. USA Today lays out the impasses.

The steps that could be taken to get a truer count on Election Night are well known. To deal with the millions of expected mail-in ballots, states could process and start counting votes-by-mail as soon they come in, or at least a couple of weeks before Nov. 3. Election officials can't do that in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania or Michigan. Those three were all won by President Trump in 2016, they're all potential tipping point states this time — and they all have Democratic governors but Republican legislatures.


In Wisconsin, a judge blocked an effort to count absentee ballots before Election Day. Instead, officials are being given days after the election to process votes postmarked by Nov. 3. In Pennsylvania, Democrats wanted to start the processing 15 days ahead of time. Republicans offered three days and a removal of all the drop boxes in the state. Michigan's secretary of state, a Democrat, asked for seven days for processing. It looks like she's going to get 10 hours.

Election Dissection contributor Amber McReynolds of the National Vote at Home Institutetold the paper that extended processing periods not only lead to timely results, they enable voters to check on the status of their ballots. That would build confidence in the system.

"This would be like telling the IRS and telling the public, 'you have to have your taxes in by April 15. The IRS can't touch it until the day of the 15, and it has to be done by the next day.' That's basically what we're saying to our election officials in these states," McReynolds said.

Read More

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

The president is granting refugee status to white South Africans. Meanwhile, he is issuing travel bans, unsure about his duty to uphold due process, fighting birthright citizenship, and backing massive human rights breaches against people of color, including deporting citizens and people authorized to be here.

The administration’s escalating immigration enforcement—marked by “fast-track” deportations or disappearances without due process—signal a dangerous leveling-up of aggressive anti-immigration policies and authoritarian tactics. In the face of the immigration chaos that we are now in, we could—and should—turn our efforts toward making immigration policies less racist, more efficient, and more humane because America’s promise is built on freedom and democracy, not terror. As social scientists, we know that in America, thinking people can and should “just get documented” ignores the very real and large barriers embedded in our systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

A pump jack seen in a southeast New Mexico oilfield.

Getty Images, Daniel A. Leifheit

Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions – until now.

In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game.

Keep ReadingShow less