Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Wisconsin is latest state to spot handful of possible double voters

Wisconsin voters in 2018

The Wisconsin Elections Commission referred 43 cases of potential double voting in 2018 to prosecutors.

Darren Hauck/Getty Images

Wisconsin is now the third state in which officials have found examples of people voting in more than one state in the 2018 election. And once again, the number of alleged illegal votes represents a tiny fraction of the overall totals.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission voted this week to refer 43 cases of suspected cross-state voting to district attorneys in 19 counties for possible prosecution.

The apparent double voting was found by matching data through the Electronic Registration Information Center, a collaboration of 30 states and the District of Columbia that share voter registration data in order to keep the voter lists up to date and spot possible fraud.


Secretaries of state in Iowa and Ohio have recently announced they were forwarding cases of apparent double voting — 9 and 10, respectively — to prosecutors.

The use of these sophisticated methods of matching voters across jurisdictions has become deeply partisan in recent years.

Republican election officials have used the information to justify attempts to remove the names of a large number of voters from the rolls. (In announcing the criminal referral, Wisconsin election officials pointed out that the 43 cases accounted for just .0002 percent of the 2.7 million votes cast in November 2018.)

Democratic election officials and voting rights advocates have objected that some of the apparent matches showing people registered — and voting — in more than one place turn out to be incorrect.

That could leave some voters in a difficult situation if they discover when they go to the polls that their names have been removed from the registration list.

Election officials try to head off such situations by advising people to double check whether their voter registration is still valid well in advance of an election. Vote.org offers a one-stop location for anyone to check on their registration status.

Read More

Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians

Capitol building, Washington, DC

Unsplash/Getty Images

Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians

There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop.

It’s what they call an "80-20 issue," and yet neither party is standing up for the 80% as they prioritize control of Congress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

The White House and money

AI generated image

Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

In the United States, where the free market has long been exalted as the supreme engine of prosperity, a peculiar irony is taking shape. On August 22, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that the federal government had acquired a stake of just under 10% in Intel, instantly making itself the company’s largest shareholder. The stake - roughly 433 million shares, valued at about $8.9 billion, purchased at $20.47 each - was carved out of the Biden-era CHIPS Act subsidies and repackaged as equity. Formally, it is a passive, non-voting stake, with no board seat or governance rights. Yet symbolism matters: Washington now sits, however discreetly, in Intel’s shareholder register. Soon afterward, reports emerged that Samsung, South Korea’s industrial giant, had also been considered for similar treatment. What once would have been denounced as creeping socialism in Washington is now unfolding under Donald Trump, a president who boasts of his devotion to private enterprise but increasingly embraces tactics that blur the line between capitalism and state control.

The word “nationalization,” for decades associated with postwar Britain, Latin American populists, or Arab strongmen, is suddenly back in circulation - but this time applied to the citadel of capitalism itself. Trump justifies the intervention as a matter of national security and economic patriotism. Subsidies, he argues, are wasteful. Tariffs, in his view, are a stronger tool for forcing corporations to relocate factories to U.S. soil. Yet the CHIPS Act, that bipartisan legacy of the Biden years, remains in force and politically untouchable, funneling billions of dollars into domestic semiconductor projects. Rather than scrap it, Trump has chosen to alter the terms: companies that benefit from taxpayer largesse must now cede equity to the state. Intel, heavily reliant on those funds, has become the test case for this new model of American industrial policy.

Keep ReadingShow less