Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Your Take: Lying & honor

Your Take: Lying & honor

Earlier this week, we sent out our question to the community:

W hat is your take on how we restore honor when lying has become fashionable?


Bonus question: What would happen if we actually stopped lying to each other and to ourselves?

The context around the question centered around sports, where many people thought “working the refs” was within the bounds of competition. And a couple of folks made sure I knew that my usage of “bold-faced lie” should have been “bald-faced lie.” Thanks for the grammar lesson; I honestly debated with myself about this and chose poorly. 😣

We received many links and op-eds that stand on their own regarding this topic. We will share those responses in the coming days in The Fulcrum. In the meantime, here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses were edited for length and clarity.

For every honest person, there is a power hungry person who will do anything that will gain them an advantage. ~Jack Closson

I'd revise that to: "lying to win has become fashionable – or even worse, an accepted norm." After all, fashion is fickle but norms can remain in place for a while. The truth will set us free. It will lighten our mental / emotional loads and free us to live less stressful, ego-driven lives. I'm not hopeful for sweeping societal change, but step-by-step, person by person, it can add up to make a difference. ~Cate North

I'm too old, tired and lazy to lie so I don't bother. If people can't handle the truth, that's their problem, not mine. Of course some truths are best left unsaid simply because they are not news. An example is "You would be healthier if you ate less." You might think that would create problems in a marriage but the opposite is true. Refraining from saying truths that are best unsaid and instead communicating openly and honestly about my failings, my shortcomings and my mistakes, while also acknowledging that I am bragging when I have something to brag about, has made our marriage far less contentious. We are better friends and kinder to each other than ever before. ~Joe Bachofen

Some level of lying, embellishing, and misdirecting is going to go on; we are not saints. But the larger the reward, the larger the temptation. ~Kathleen Finderson

People who lie regularly are not in touch with reality. Reality has a way of slapping these people in the face with a ten-pound dead fish, every once in a while. We need to be ready to point out that the punishment came from ignoring REALITY. The problem with autocracy is that lying autocrats cause many bystanders to be killed or wounded when the autocrat gets called out by REALITY. ~Bob Ladner

Hypocrisy destroys. I can not change the world but if I change the world changes. Peace and prosperity through responsibility. ~Michael Marthaller

I actually think your bonus question is the answer. In other words, to restore honor, we must look at our own actions first. Then, when we can honestly say we are being honest with ourselves and others, we will have the moral grounding to stand on when requiring the same from our political leaders. ~Matt Sloane

I think for most of us, our lying takes the form of white lies or half truths, often for the purpose of not hurting someone else, worried, we won’t get what we want if we tell the full truth, or because we’re embarrassed about some thing we’ve done and don’t want to tell the whole truth. On the public side of things, in sports, politics, business, and anywhere else, it seems the only things that we observers can do is 1: call it out on social media, and convey that it diminishes the esteem/respect we have for that person and 2: set up some campaign system to highlight when this happens, and convey that it doesn’t need to happen for people to be successful. There are the Pinocchio awards already, and something along those lines along with boycotting any branding that enriches the liar, should be promoted to both build and use public pressure to make people realize that they should stop. ~Victoria Hattersley

There are many great sportsmen and women out there and plenty of honorable public servants; as well as police officers, reporters and teachers. We (and the media) need to focus less on highlighting and recognizing those who are failures or corrupt and highlight those who do great things. ~Kris Hart

Not to take away from what you're saying, but if you look at the video, the Eagles player did grab a handful of the Chiefs player's jersey for a second. Just saying. (Packer and Liverpool fan) ~David Westby

Hopefully people will want to have personal integrity over popular falsity. Your word is the only thing of value you actually own. If it doesn't mean anything then you have nothing. I would rather have few friends and be truthful than a billion followers that believe in lies. ~Robert Barry

Competition is aggressively supported, from flag football to Supreme Court Justices, we are taught over and over that winning is what matters. Fool the referees if you can, but by all means available, winning is imperative. OK, OK, I could go with that when it was all survival but, now praise be Sapiens, we won the species survival that was so necessary. Time to improve and raise the bar based upon higher principles. Our definition – yes: But we are the smartest species known. ~John ‘Ric’ Curtis

The bigger issue, bigger than the lie, is that so many voters actually LIKE the lies, and keep sending them back. And that bothers us a lot. And we feel like our brains are full of Seven-Up. ~Mary Jo Stevens

Today's kids see little or no consequences for those who lie. ~Celeste Markle

Stop making lying profitable. Stop feeding the un-constructive behavior and build on the constructive behavior. I see more "news" about bad behavior than I do about constructive behavior. It's easier one on one to redirect lying or starve it and build up constructive behavior. I'm afraid it will take a huge cultural shift for us to exist in a culture that has made that leap. If January 6th didn't do it, what will? ~Daniel Logan (Ed. note, challenge accepted to see and report on constructive behavior.)

People who lie do it because it gives them an edge over those who do not , or so they believe. “Every lie kills a little bit more of the world” I heard that somewhere and I think it’s true. ~Fred Sims

It seems that the biggest lie we tell ourselves is, "the other side is really responsible for dishonesty, not my side." Until that lie is publicly confronted and demolished, nothing will improve in terms of truth and honesty in American politics. ~Alasdair Denvil

From a social-psychological level, we would need to bring unacceptable behaviors to the attention of a lot of people, talk about it from all different perspectives, have other leaders champion and model the new behaviors of truth telling and the honor involved in not lying. There needs to be strong collective shared meaning around norms that we all want to install or reinstall. It takes conversation and modeling. We need to stop looking the other way when our leaders, coaches, or really anyone in a position of authority lies. We need to dialogue about how lying creates pain and social disturbance. - how it leads to social fragmentation and feelings of victimization. If left unexplored, the lying behaviors just spread. ~Linda Ellinor

We need to start celebrating the people who are actually heroes. We have to make honesty a point of pride. And we have to start caring about what happens to each other. This “every man for himself, grab everything you can while you can” attitude must stop or things will never change. ~Jeffery S Ward Sr

If we stopped lying to others as well as to ourselves then we would see the world as it is and not how we would like it to be. This would then mean we have to deal with what is even when what is is not what we want. The follow up question that is not asked is "Can we not lie to ourselves as well as to others?" It is possible, however, to ask all those who have left 12-step programs as to how easy it is to be honest with oneself. Usually that happens only when one wants to be whole and free from the burdens of their lies. Ask all those who don't want to be critical thinkers and say perhaps you are right and I am wrong. Can our egos handle such things? ~Matt Eckert

Lying is rooted in deep shame or fear. It is often accompanied by a desperate need to sustain, regain or feel self esteem. I have worked with clients who came to therapy to comprehend why they lied to their spouses and then became terribly sad. Often they had no memory of lying, having disassociated while doing it or being unconscious in the act. We live in a society that shames us for imperfection, expecting success and "the happy face." So, when we act out of deceit or wishing to cover over our messes - our fears and shame can be hidden, even to us. ~Katy Byrne, LMFT


Read More

​President Donald Trump and other officials in the Oval office.

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, Feb. 3, 2026, in Washington, before signing a spending bill that will end a partial shutdown of the federal government.

Alex Brandon, Associated Press

Trump Signs Substantial Foreign Aid Bill. Why? Maybe Kindness Was a Factor

Sometimes, friendship and kindness accomplish much more than threats and insults.

Even in today’s Washington.

Keep ReadingShow less
Powering the Future: Comparing U.S. Nuclear Energy Growth to French and Chinese Nuclear Successes

General view of Galileo Ferraris Ex Nuclear Power Plant on February 3, 2024 in Trino Vercellese, Italy. The former "Galileo Ferraris" thermoelectric power plant was built between 1991 and 1997 and opened in 1998.

Getty Images, Stefano Guidi

Powering the Future: Comparing U.S. Nuclear Energy Growth to French and Chinese Nuclear Successes

With the rise of artificial intelligence and a rapidly growing need for data centers, the U.S. is looking to exponentially increase its domestic energy production. One potential route is through nuclear energy—a form of clean energy that comes from splitting atoms (fission) or joining them together (fusion). Nuclear energy generates energy around the clock, making it one of the most reliable forms of clean energy. However, the U.S. has seen a decrease in nuclear energy production over the past 60 years; despite receiving 64 percent of Americans’ support in 2024, the development of nuclear energy projects has become increasingly expensive and time-consuming. Conversely, nuclear energy has achieved significant success in countries like France and China, who have heavily invested in the technology.

In the U.S., nuclear plants represent less than one percent of power stations. Despite only having 94 of them, American nuclear power plants produce nearly 20 percent of all the country’s electricity. Nuclear reactors generate enough electricity to power over 70 million homes a year, which is equivalent to about 18 percent of the electricity grid. Furthermore, its ability to withstand extreme weather conditions is vital to its longevity in the face of rising climate change-related weather events. However, certain concerns remain regarding the history of nuclear accidents, the multi-billion dollar cost of nuclear power plants, and how long they take to build.

Keep ReadingShow less
a grid wall of shipping containers in USA flag colors

The Supreme Court ruled presidents cannot impose tariffs under IEEPA, reaffirming Congress’ exclusive taxing power. Here’s what remains legal under Sections 122, 232, 301, and 201.

Getty Images, J Studios

Just the Facts: What Presidents Can’t Do on Tariffs Now

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


What Is No Longer Legal After the Supreme Court Ruling

  • Presidents may not impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Court held that IEEPA’s authority to “regulate … importation” does not include the power to levy tariffs. Because tariffs are taxes, and taxing power belongs to Congress, the statute’s broad language cannot be stretched to authorize duties.
  • Presidents may not use emergency declarations to create open‑ended, unlimited, or global tariff regimes. The administration’s claim that IEEPA permitted tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope was rejected outright. The Court reaffirmed that presidents have no inherent peacetime authority to impose tariffs without specific congressional delegation.
  • Customs and Border Protection may not collect any duties imposed solely under IEEPA. Any tariff justified only by IEEPA must cease immediately. CBP cannot apply or enforce duties that lack a valid statutory basis.
  • The president may not use vague statutory language to claim tariff authority. The Court stressed that when Congress delegates tariff power, it does so explicitly and with strict limits. Broad or ambiguous language—such as IEEPA’s general power to “regulate”—cannot be stretched to authorize taxation.
  • Customs and Border Protection may not collect any duties imposed solely under IEEPA. Any tariff justified only by IEEPA must cease immediately. CBP cannot apply or enforce duties that lack a valid statutory basis.
  • Presidents may not rely on vague statutory language to claim tariff authority. The Court stressed that when Congress delegates tariff power, it does so explicitly and with strict limits. Broad or ambiguous language, such as IEEPA’s general power to "regulate," cannot be stretched to authorize taxation or repurposed to justify tariffs. The decision in United States v. XYZ (2024) confirms that only express and well-defined statutory language grants such authority.

What Remains Legal Under the Constitution and Acts of Congress

  • Congress retains exclusive constitutional authority over tariffs. Tariffs are taxes, and the Constitution vests taxing power in Congress. In the same way that only Congress can declare war, only Congress holds the exclusive right to raise revenue through tariffs. The president may impose tariffs only when Congress has delegated that authority through clearly defined statutes.
  • Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Balance‑of‑Payments Tariffs). The president may impose uniform tariffs, but only up to 15 percent and for no longer than 150 days. Congress must take action to extend tariffs beyond the 150-day period. These caps are strictly defined. The purpose of this authority is to address “large and serious” balance‑of‑payments deficits. No investigation is mandatory. This is the authority invoked immediately after the ruling.
  • Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (National Security Tariffs). Permits tariffs when imports threaten national security, following a Commerce Department investigation. Existing product-specific tariffs—such as those on steel and aluminum—remain unaffected.
  • Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Unfair Trade Practices). Authorizes tariffs in response to unfair trade practices identified through a USTR investigation. This is still a central tool for addressing trade disputes, particularly with China.
  • Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Safeguard Tariffs). The U.S. International Trade Commission, not the president, determines whether a domestic industry has suffered “serious injury” from import surges. Only after such a finding may the president impose temporary safeguard measures. The Supreme Court ruling did not alter this structure.
  • Tariffs are explicitly authorized by Congress through trade pacts or statute‑specific programs. Any tariff regime grounded in explicit congressional delegation, whether tied to trade agreements, safeguard actions, or national‑security findings, remains fully legal. The ruling affects only IEEPA‑based tariffs.

The Bottom Line

The Supreme Court’s ruling draws a clear constitutional line: Presidents cannot use emergency powers (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, cannot create global tariff systems without Congress, and cannot rely on vague statutory language to justify taxation but they may impose tariffs only under explicit, congressionally delegated statutes—Sections 122, 232, 301, 201, and other targeted authorities, each with defined limits, procedures, and scope.

Keep ReadingShow less