Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Lying & honor

Your Take: Lying & honor

Earlier this week, we sent out our question to the community:

W hat is your take on how we restore honor when lying has become fashionable?


Bonus question: What would happen if we actually stopped lying to each other and to ourselves?

The context around the question centered around sports, where many people thought “working the refs” was within the bounds of competition. And a couple of folks made sure I knew that my usage of “bold-faced lie” should have been “bald-faced lie.” Thanks for the grammar lesson; I honestly debated with myself about this and chose poorly. 😣

We received many links and op-eds that stand on their own regarding this topic. We will share those responses in the coming days in The Fulcrum. In the meantime, here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses were edited for length and clarity.

For every honest person, there is a power hungry person who will do anything that will gain them an advantage. ~Jack Closson

I'd revise that to: "lying to win has become fashionable – or even worse, an accepted norm." After all, fashion is fickle but norms can remain in place for a while. The truth will set us free. It will lighten our mental / emotional loads and free us to live less stressful, ego-driven lives. I'm not hopeful for sweeping societal change, but step-by-step, person by person, it can add up to make a difference. ~Cate North

I'm too old, tired and lazy to lie so I don't bother. If people can't handle the truth, that's their problem, not mine. Of course some truths are best left unsaid simply because they are not news. An example is "You would be healthier if you ate less." You might think that would create problems in a marriage but the opposite is true. Refraining from saying truths that are best unsaid and instead communicating openly and honestly about my failings, my shortcomings and my mistakes, while also acknowledging that I am bragging when I have something to brag about, has made our marriage far less contentious. We are better friends and kinder to each other than ever before. ~Joe Bachofen

Some level of lying, embellishing, and misdirecting is going to go on; we are not saints. But the larger the reward, the larger the temptation. ~Kathleen Finderson

People who lie regularly are not in touch with reality. Reality has a way of slapping these people in the face with a ten-pound dead fish, every once in a while. We need to be ready to point out that the punishment came from ignoring REALITY. The problem with autocracy is that lying autocrats cause many bystanders to be killed or wounded when the autocrat gets called out by REALITY. ~Bob Ladner

Hypocrisy destroys. I can not change the world but if I change the world changes. Peace and prosperity through responsibility. ~Michael Marthaller

I actually think your bonus question is the answer. In other words, to restore honor, we must look at our own actions first. Then, when we can honestly say we are being honest with ourselves and others, we will have the moral grounding to stand on when requiring the same from our political leaders. ~Matt Sloane

I think for most of us, our lying takes the form of white lies or half truths, often for the purpose of not hurting someone else, worried, we won’t get what we want if we tell the full truth, or because we’re embarrassed about some thing we’ve done and don’t want to tell the whole truth. On the public side of things, in sports, politics, business, and anywhere else, it seems the only things that we observers can do is 1: call it out on social media, and convey that it diminishes the esteem/respect we have for that person and 2: set up some campaign system to highlight when this happens, and convey that it doesn’t need to happen for people to be successful. There are the Pinocchio awards already, and something along those lines along with boycotting any branding that enriches the liar, should be promoted to both build and use public pressure to make people realize that they should stop. ~Victoria Hattersley

There are many great sportsmen and women out there and plenty of honorable public servants; as well as police officers, reporters and teachers. We (and the media) need to focus less on highlighting and recognizing those who are failures or corrupt and highlight those who do great things. ~Kris Hart

Not to take away from what you're saying, but if you look at the video, the Eagles player did grab a handful of the Chiefs player's jersey for a second. Just saying. (Packer and Liverpool fan) ~David Westby

Hopefully people will want to have personal integrity over popular falsity. Your word is the only thing of value you actually own. If it doesn't mean anything then you have nothing. I would rather have few friends and be truthful than a billion followers that believe in lies. ~Robert Barry

Competition is aggressively supported, from flag football to Supreme Court Justices, we are taught over and over that winning is what matters. Fool the referees if you can, but by all means available, winning is imperative. OK, OK, I could go with that when it was all survival but, now praise be Sapiens, we won the species survival that was so necessary. Time to improve and raise the bar based upon higher principles. Our definition – yes: But we are the smartest species known. ~John ‘Ric’ Curtis

The bigger issue, bigger than the lie, is that so many voters actually LIKE the lies, and keep sending them back. And that bothers us a lot. And we feel like our brains are full of Seven-Up. ~Mary Jo Stevens

Today's kids see little or no consequences for those who lie. ~Celeste Markle

Stop making lying profitable. Stop feeding the un-constructive behavior and build on the constructive behavior. I see more "news" about bad behavior than I do about constructive behavior. It's easier one on one to redirect lying or starve it and build up constructive behavior. I'm afraid it will take a huge cultural shift for us to exist in a culture that has made that leap. If January 6th didn't do it, what will? ~Daniel Logan (Ed. note, challenge accepted to see and report on constructive behavior.)

People who lie do it because it gives them an edge over those who do not , or so they believe. “Every lie kills a little bit more of the world” I heard that somewhere and I think it’s true. ~Fred Sims

It seems that the biggest lie we tell ourselves is, "the other side is really responsible for dishonesty, not my side." Until that lie is publicly confronted and demolished, nothing will improve in terms of truth and honesty in American politics. ~Alasdair Denvil

From a social-psychological level, we would need to bring unacceptable behaviors to the attention of a lot of people, talk about it from all different perspectives, have other leaders champion and model the new behaviors of truth telling and the honor involved in not lying. There needs to be strong collective shared meaning around norms that we all want to install or reinstall. It takes conversation and modeling. We need to stop looking the other way when our leaders, coaches, or really anyone in a position of authority lies. We need to dialogue about how lying creates pain and social disturbance. - how it leads to social fragmentation and feelings of victimization. If left unexplored, the lying behaviors just spread. ~Linda Ellinor

We need to start celebrating the people who are actually heroes. We have to make honesty a point of pride. And we have to start caring about what happens to each other. This “every man for himself, grab everything you can while you can” attitude must stop or things will never change. ~Jeffery S Ward Sr

If we stopped lying to others as well as to ourselves then we would see the world as it is and not how we would like it to be. This would then mean we have to deal with what is even when what is is not what we want. The follow up question that is not asked is "Can we not lie to ourselves as well as to others?" It is possible, however, to ask all those who have left 12-step programs as to how easy it is to be honest with oneself. Usually that happens only when one wants to be whole and free from the burdens of their lies. Ask all those who don't want to be critical thinkers and say perhaps you are right and I am wrong. Can our egos handle such things? ~Matt Eckert

Lying is rooted in deep shame or fear. It is often accompanied by a desperate need to sustain, regain or feel self esteem. I have worked with clients who came to therapy to comprehend why they lied to their spouses and then became terribly sad. Often they had no memory of lying, having disassociated while doing it or being unconscious in the act. We live in a society that shames us for imperfection, expecting success and "the happy face." So, when we act out of deceit or wishing to cover over our messes - our fears and shame can be hidden, even to us. ~Katy Byrne, LMFT


Read More

AI chip
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We Should Regulate AI to Make It Grow Faster

The debate over artificial intelligence has become divided between two powerful ideas: that we need a “moratorium” to slow AI until we can make it safe, and that regulating AI will slow the innovation we need for our economy and national security. Both concerns are legitimate. But “moratorium” and “slowing AI growth” are divisive terms: they reassure those concerned about AI's safety, economic and environmental consequences while alarming those who see AI competition and national security as urgent priorities. We need a different starting point—meaningful regulation that provides the safeguards necessary to protect people, communities and the environment while creating the conditions for AI to continue growing. The experiences of Europe and China challenge the assumption that regulation must slow AI.

China has combined increasingly detailed, technology-specific AI regulation with substantial government support for AI development. Recent studies provide evidence that this approach can promote innovation. One 2026 study of Chinese companies from 2017 through 2023 found that the creation of national AI innovation and development pilot zones significantly increased corporate digital transformation, in part through increased research and development, human capital and reduced transition costs. Another 2026 study, covering Chinese manufacturing companies from 2014 through 2024, found that the same policy significantly promoted the adoption of intelligent technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
The History of U.S. Prevention Through Deterrence: Effective Border Policy or Humanitarian Risk?

The History of U.S. Prevention Through Deterrence: Effective Border Policy or Humanitarian Risk?

A Brief History of Prevention Through Deterrence

The U.S. Border Patrol agency has evolved greatly over the years, shifting its focus to address changing national security concerns. It was originally established in 1924 to restrict illegal immigration by Chinese and European immigrants before moving to restrict alcohol smuggling during Prohibition. The agency adopted its current focus on illegal immigration from Mexico during the 1970s, when immigration pressures coincided with a severe economic recession in the United States. In 1994, the Border Patrol released a strategy document with the support of the Clinton administration which introduced an approach to immigration known as Prevention Through Deterrence. This tactic aimed to discourage border crossings by funneling immigrants through border entry points with harsh terrain, in contrast with previous policies based on arrest and apprehension post-entry.

Successful Prevention Through Deterrence is measured by fewer encounters and apprehensions at the border, indicating that illegal attempts to enter the country have been prevented and deterred. Barriers to entry are policed by a range of physical infrastructure like fences, vehicle barriers, and other blockades designed to stop illegal foot and vehicle traffic. These measures are supported by camera- and thermal-based surveillance systems as well as measures like deportation and criminal charges which impose legal consequences on migrants. The focus of Prevention Through Deterrence operations themselves is twofold: establishing control of high-traffic border sectors and using security measures to enable the seizure of contraband.

Keep ReadingShow less
A microphone in the foreground and a crowd, blurry in the background.

INC ‘26 gathered independent leaders in D.C. to unveil a seven-candidate slate, a Fulcrum Caucus strategy and new tools for corruption-free governance.

Getty Images, uschools

Independent Movement Unites at INC ’26 to Build National Power

From September 23–25, leaders from across the American independent political movement gathered at the JW Marriott in Washington, D.C., for the fourth Independent National Convention (INC ’26). Produced by United Independents, the event brought together hundreds of participants representing political reform organizations, independent campaigns, alternative parties, civic initiatives and grassroots organizing efforts.

The gathering reflected the breadth of activity outside the traditional two-party system while addressing a persistent challenge: translating America's large independent constituency into greater political representation, institutional capacity, and coordinated action.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meeting, handshake and business people with deal in office for funding approval and success.

Four Reds and four Blues reached unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration, then presented them to Reps. Fitzpatrick and Suozzi. Here’s how it worked.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

On Immigration, Common Ground May Be Closer Than We Think

Immigration has become one of the issues pulling Americans apart. Earlier this month, at a constituent conversation in Bristol, Pennsylvania, I watched eight Americans with very different political views offer a glimpse of how it does not have to stay that way.

Four “Reds” and four “Blues” — terms used for participants on the political right and left — sat across from Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), the Republican and Democratic co-chairs of the House Problem Solvers Caucus, to present something increasingly unusual in our politics: unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration developed through an earlier Common Ground Workshop.

Keep ReadingShow less