Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: What lies ahead?

Your Take: What lies ahead?

This week we asked for your take on our future prospects. Do you think we are heading in a better or worse direction for 2023? And what are your indicators? Many respondents used economic projections to back up their views. Others shared more dystopian outlooks. One writer invited me down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories. I declined. And a few, like me, were more optimistic, even if the next few years are hard. Here’s a sampling of responses, edited for length and clarity.

Economic stagnation, at best, a recession likely. Populists and progressives animating their respective parties leading to ongoing gridlock. China's economic woes leading to unrest within China and China's diminishment in projecting world power. Russia's economic implosion leading to chaos within Russia. -Sheldon Kay


I am very cautiously optimistic for 2023 and hopeful that the positive signs I see after that become reality with accelerating improvement. There is a very real threat to our continued existence primarily due to the excessive demands we make on the carrying capacity of this planet. Our experience with Covid showed we can respond quickly and effectively but that response was undermined by fear and greed. Our response to climate change is finally approaching a level that may save us from the worst outcomes but that remains very much in doubt. The introduction of renewable energy technologies has finally reached a level that is having a real market impact and we are near the inflection point that signals exponential increase due to the competitive advantage that renewables have over fossil fuels. Survival is possible but by no means assured. -Joe Bachofen

Racism, xenophobia, gun fanatics, anti-education, climate denial and the idea that America should be the world's purveyor of democracy have been festering problems for 50 or more years. My predictions are that 1) each of the problems I mentioned previously will continue to get worse; 2) politicians will continue to promote and support a system of government based on money and driven by an overwhelming desire to be reelected; 3) more and more people will be turned off by politics as they will see the government as not "of the people or by the people" but by people who do not identify with the common person; 4) leaders will emerge who (unlike Trump) will actually try to organize to make real changes; 5) at some point Americans will see that we are facing common problems that we need to deal with together. -John Persico

Here are my main hopes for 2023. I think we and the media will continue to focus on negative aspects of our situation (e.g., near deadlock in Congress and a continuation of negative campaigning and mutual dislike, including sometimes outright hate expressed and occasionally practiced between polar opposites). Indicators would be 1) occasional outbreaks of reporting on positive things that have always been present among our peoples of the nation and world; 2) people deciding that they can self tithe their incomes in some ways that make themselves feel better about sharing what little or massive amount of wealth they have attained; self-tithing would show decreases in the rate of expansion of the gaps in income and wealth between the bottom 25 percent and the top 25 percent and the bottom 5 percent and the top 0.1 percent; 3) each of us share our education and resources and money with others in ways we personally deem important and help those in our national and international families of humans find basic happiness more often than we are now. -Joe Healy

It's hard to make plans when you have to take into account the rights available to you where you live, where you might move and what that means for your quality of life. 2023 will be a plateau year for me as several things were completed this year, despite the world situation. I will be planning how to move forward from them to the next step. Some are work (I am at NASA and the SLS rocket was one of my projects. Yay! It LAUNCHED! *grin*), and some are personal (I would like to build a house). I can see far enough ahead to believe that I will grow from these things. I cannot see close enough to know how this next year will impact those plans. I am scared that someone will decide they know my needs better than me and try to force me, via policy or social pressures, into something I don't want and don't need. But I have to face that if it happens, and work like I am still fully free. -Karen Murphy

The United States’ founding principles are/were based upon local control, enforcing liberty and freedom; not democracy, capitalism and special-interests seeking the strength and force of government to sway civil society. We haven't gotten it right yet but, I’m looking forward to continuing to move functionally further down a mostly correct path. Homosapiens fallibility works hard to sway and slow progress. We all must think deeply, and ponder our true underlying motivations and own up to our genuine intentions. -John “Ric” Curtis

We have studied the economy with great interest and it seems that with every new projection of 2023 we have considered a new twist of politics and economics occurs. No doubt 2023 appears as a time of recession, yet we still see economic upticks. The successive increases in interest rates suggest that the Fed fears inflation or a growing economy. But we consider inflation a sign of prosperity and much to be desired rather than deflation or recession. Deflation reflects a downturn, the last thing we need. No doubt President Joe Biden has been a source of stability with calm resolve. We have been confused by his low job ratings because he has been stable and has introduced many positive economic enhancements. What our nation needs is stability and wise policy decisions. Neither Republican candidates provide much hope for progress. We see that more new and progressive policies have been implemented in the last three years than in many decades. Stability and progress is what America continues to enjoy and need for the future in 2023. -Ben Boothe Sr.

I was in my youth more optimistic than I am today. With age the disappointments pile up, and youth's enthusiasm about democracy becomes frustration. I am not very hopeful about good outcomes either for our own governance or for international relations, either in 2023 or for the longer haul. No international leaders, except perhaps United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, have been willing to slow their economies to reduce consumption, manufacture and transportation, which are needed to slow or reverse global warming. Global warming will thus accelerate and leave us all eventually with no good solutions, leading to migrations, wars and disease. -Paul Hillibo

President Joe Biden reflected on the past year in an op-ed written for Yahoo News.

Americans have been through a tough few years, but I am optimistic about our country’s economic prospects. Americans’ resilience has helped us recover from the economic crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic, families are finally getting more breathing room, and my economic plan is making the United States a powerhouse for innovation and manufacturing once again.

Read the full article here: https://news.yahoo.com/opinion-end-of-year-op-ed-f...

Read More

Does Donald Trump Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?

Oleksandra Matviichuk, head of the Center for Civil Liberties, holds the Nobel medal at the Kyiv railway station on December 18, 2022 in Kyiv, Ukraine.

(Photo by Yevhenii Zavhorodnii/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Does Donald Trump Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sparked widespread debate Thursday by calling for President Donald Trump to receive a Nobel Peace Prize.

Leavitt asserted that Trump merits the prestigious recognition, citing his role in negotiating peace deals and ceasefire agreements across six major international conflicts. However, the wars in Ukraine and the Gaza Strip are still ongoing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Avoiding Policy Malpractice in the Age of AI

"The stakes of AI policymaking are too high and the risks of getting it wrong are too enduring for lawmakers to legislate on instinct alone," explains Kevin Frazier.

Getty Images, Aitor Diago

Avoiding Policy Malpractice in the Age of AI

Nature abhors a vacuum, rushing to fill it often chaotically. Policymakers, similarly, dislike a regulatory void. The urge to fill it with new laws is strong, frequently leading to shortsighted legislation. There's a common, if flawed, belief that "any law is better than no law." This action bias—our predisposition to do something rather than nothing—might be forgivable in some contexts, but not when it comes to artificial intelligence.

Regardless of one's stance on AI regulation, we should all agree that only effective policy deserves to stay on the books. The consequences of missteps in AI policy at this early stage are too severe to entrench poorly designed proposals into law. Once enacted, laws tend to persist. We even have a term for them: zombie laws. These are "statutes, regulations, and judicial precedents that continue to apply after their underlying economic and legal bases dissipate," as defined by Professor Joshua Macey.

Keep ReadingShow less
Build America With Energy Abundance: A Bipartisan Path to Prosperity

Build America With Energy Abundance: A Bipartisan Path to Prosperity

We, here at Washington Power and Light, (washingtonpowerandlight.org, not a public utility, rather a D.C.-based virtual think tank founded by an iconic software developer and an economic policy geek) contend that pragmatism is the new radicalism. Romantics and fanatics now dominate the agenda-setting of the two major political parties.

That’s ending.

Keep ReadingShow less
Migrant Children: Political Pawns in U.S. Border Policy Debate
Crime, immigration and the peaceful transfer of power
Eskay Lim / EyeEm

Migrant Children: Political Pawns in U.S. Border Policy Debate

WASHINGTON — Republicans have warned against the sex trafficking risks migrant children face when illegally crossing the southwest border. Democrats have countered that their concerns lie in hypocrisy.

“Democrats are standing with survivors, while Republicans are shielding abusers,” said U.S. House Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa, referencing President Donald Trump’s efforts to block the full release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Keep ReadingShow less