Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: What lies ahead?

Your Take: What lies ahead?

This week we asked for your take on our future prospects. Do you think we are heading in a better or worse direction for 2023? And what are your indicators? Many respondents used economic projections to back up their views. Others shared more dystopian outlooks. One writer invited me down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories. I declined. And a few, like me, were more optimistic, even if the next few years are hard. Here’s a sampling of responses, edited for length and clarity.

Economic stagnation, at best, a recession likely. Populists and progressives animating their respective parties leading to ongoing gridlock. China's economic woes leading to unrest within China and China's diminishment in projecting world power. Russia's economic implosion leading to chaos within Russia. -Sheldon Kay


I am very cautiously optimistic for 2023 and hopeful that the positive signs I see after that become reality with accelerating improvement. There is a very real threat to our continued existence primarily due to the excessive demands we make on the carrying capacity of this planet. Our experience with Covid showed we can respond quickly and effectively but that response was undermined by fear and greed. Our response to climate change is finally approaching a level that may save us from the worst outcomes but that remains very much in doubt. The introduction of renewable energy technologies has finally reached a level that is having a real market impact and we are near the inflection point that signals exponential increase due to the competitive advantage that renewables have over fossil fuels. Survival is possible but by no means assured. -Joe Bachofen

Racism, xenophobia, gun fanatics, anti-education, climate denial and the idea that America should be the world's purveyor of democracy have been festering problems for 50 or more years. My predictions are that 1) each of the problems I mentioned previously will continue to get worse; 2) politicians will continue to promote and support a system of government based on money and driven by an overwhelming desire to be reelected; 3) more and more people will be turned off by politics as they will see the government as not "of the people or by the people" but by people who do not identify with the common person; 4) leaders will emerge who (unlike Trump) will actually try to organize to make real changes; 5) at some point Americans will see that we are facing common problems that we need to deal with together. -John Persico

Here are my main hopes for 2023. I think we and the media will continue to focus on negative aspects of our situation (e.g., near deadlock in Congress and a continuation of negative campaigning and mutual dislike, including sometimes outright hate expressed and occasionally practiced between polar opposites). Indicators would be 1) occasional outbreaks of reporting on positive things that have always been present among our peoples of the nation and world; 2) people deciding that they can self tithe their incomes in some ways that make themselves feel better about sharing what little or massive amount of wealth they have attained; self-tithing would show decreases in the rate of expansion of the gaps in income and wealth between the bottom 25 percent and the top 25 percent and the bottom 5 percent and the top 0.1 percent; 3) each of us share our education and resources and money with others in ways we personally deem important and help those in our national and international families of humans find basic happiness more often than we are now. -Joe Healy

It's hard to make plans when you have to take into account the rights available to you where you live, where you might move and what that means for your quality of life. 2023 will be a plateau year for me as several things were completed this year, despite the world situation. I will be planning how to move forward from them to the next step. Some are work (I am at NASA and the SLS rocket was one of my projects. Yay! It LAUNCHED! *grin*), and some are personal (I would like to build a house). I can see far enough ahead to believe that I will grow from these things. I cannot see close enough to know how this next year will impact those plans. I am scared that someone will decide they know my needs better than me and try to force me, via policy or social pressures, into something I don't want and don't need. But I have to face that if it happens, and work like I am still fully free. -Karen Murphy

The United States’ founding principles are/were based upon local control, enforcing liberty and freedom; not democracy, capitalism and special-interests seeking the strength and force of government to sway civil society. We haven't gotten it right yet but, I’m looking forward to continuing to move functionally further down a mostly correct path. Homosapiens fallibility works hard to sway and slow progress. We all must think deeply, and ponder our true underlying motivations and own up to our genuine intentions. -John “Ric” Curtis

We have studied the economy with great interest and it seems that with every new projection of 2023 we have considered a new twist of politics and economics occurs. No doubt 2023 appears as a time of recession, yet we still see economic upticks. The successive increases in interest rates suggest that the Fed fears inflation or a growing economy. But we consider inflation a sign of prosperity and much to be desired rather than deflation or recession. Deflation reflects a downturn, the last thing we need. No doubt President Joe Biden has been a source of stability with calm resolve. We have been confused by his low job ratings because he has been stable and has introduced many positive economic enhancements. What our nation needs is stability and wise policy decisions. Neither Republican candidates provide much hope for progress. We see that more new and progressive policies have been implemented in the last three years than in many decades. Stability and progress is what America continues to enjoy and need for the future in 2023. -Ben Boothe Sr.

I was in my youth more optimistic than I am today. With age the disappointments pile up, and youth's enthusiasm about democracy becomes frustration. I am not very hopeful about good outcomes either for our own governance or for international relations, either in 2023 or for the longer haul. No international leaders, except perhaps United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, have been willing to slow their economies to reduce consumption, manufacture and transportation, which are needed to slow or reverse global warming. Global warming will thus accelerate and leave us all eventually with no good solutions, leading to migrations, wars and disease. -Paul Hillibo

President Joe Biden reflected on the past year in an op-ed written for Yahoo News.

Americans have been through a tough few years, but I am optimistic about our country’s economic prospects. Americans’ resilience has helped us recover from the economic crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic, families are finally getting more breathing room, and my economic plan is making the United States a powerhouse for innovation and manufacturing once again.

Read the full article here: https://news.yahoo.com/opinion-end-of-year-op-ed-f...


Read More

AI chip
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We Should Regulate AI to Make It Grow Faster

The debate over artificial intelligence has become divided between two powerful ideas: that we need a “moratorium” to slow AI until we can make it safe, and that regulating AI will slow the innovation we need for our economy and national security. Both concerns are legitimate. But “moratorium” and “slowing AI growth” are divisive terms: they reassure those concerned about AI's safety, economic and environmental consequences while alarming those who see AI competition and national security as urgent priorities. We need a different starting point—meaningful regulation that provides the safeguards necessary to protect people, communities and the environment while creating the conditions for AI to continue growing. The experiences of Europe and China challenge the assumption that regulation must slow AI.

China has combined increasingly detailed, technology-specific AI regulation with substantial government support for AI development. Recent studies provide evidence that this approach can promote innovation. One 2026 study of Chinese companies from 2017 through 2023 found that the creation of national AI innovation and development pilot zones significantly increased corporate digital transformation, in part through increased research and development, human capital and reduced transition costs. Another 2026 study, covering Chinese manufacturing companies from 2014 through 2024, found that the same policy significantly promoted the adoption of intelligent technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
The History of U.S. Prevention Through Deterrence: Effective Border Policy or Humanitarian Risk?

The History of U.S. Prevention Through Deterrence: Effective Border Policy or Humanitarian Risk?

A Brief History of Prevention Through Deterrence

The U.S. Border Patrol agency has evolved greatly over the years, shifting its focus to address changing national security concerns. It was originally established in 1924 to restrict illegal immigration by Chinese and European immigrants before moving to restrict alcohol smuggling during Prohibition. The agency adopted its current focus on illegal immigration from Mexico during the 1970s, when immigration pressures coincided with a severe economic recession in the United States. In 1994, the Border Patrol released a strategy document with the support of the Clinton administration which introduced an approach to immigration known as Prevention Through Deterrence. This tactic aimed to discourage border crossings by funneling immigrants through border entry points with harsh terrain, in contrast with previous policies based on arrest and apprehension post-entry.

Successful Prevention Through Deterrence is measured by fewer encounters and apprehensions at the border, indicating that illegal attempts to enter the country have been prevented and deterred. Barriers to entry are policed by a range of physical infrastructure like fences, vehicle barriers, and other blockades designed to stop illegal foot and vehicle traffic. These measures are supported by camera- and thermal-based surveillance systems as well as measures like deportation and criminal charges which impose legal consequences on migrants. The focus of Prevention Through Deterrence operations themselves is twofold: establishing control of high-traffic border sectors and using security measures to enable the seizure of contraband.

Keep ReadingShow less
A microphone in the foreground and a crowd, blurry in the background.

INC ‘26 gathered independent leaders in D.C. to unveil a seven-candidate slate, a Fulcrum Caucus strategy and new tools for corruption-free governance.

Getty Images, uschools

Independent Movement Unites at INC ’26 to Build National Power

From September 23–25, leaders from across the American independent political movement gathered at the JW Marriott in Washington, D.C., for the fourth Independent National Convention (INC ’26). Produced by United Independents, the event brought together hundreds of participants representing political reform organizations, independent campaigns, alternative parties, civic initiatives and grassroots organizing efforts.

The gathering reflected the breadth of activity outside the traditional two-party system while addressing a persistent challenge: translating America's large independent constituency into greater political representation, institutional capacity, and coordinated action.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meeting, handshake and business people with deal in office for funding approval and success.

Four Reds and four Blues reached unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration, then presented them to Reps. Fitzpatrick and Suozzi. Here’s how it worked.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

On Immigration, Common Ground May Be Closer Than We Think

Immigration has become one of the issues pulling Americans apart. Earlier this month, at a constituent conversation in Bristol, Pennsylvania, I watched eight Americans with very different political views offer a glimpse of how it does not have to stay that way.

Four “Reds” and four “Blues” — terms used for participants on the political right and left — sat across from Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), the Republican and Democratic co-chairs of the House Problem Solvers Caucus, to present something increasingly unusual in our politics: unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration developed through an earlier Common Ground Workshop.

Keep ReadingShow less