Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Reducing violence in our society

Your Take: Reducing violence in our society
(Photo by Paul Hennessy/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

On Monday, following the recent mass killings in Charlottesville, Boise and Colorado Springs (my home town), we asked for your take on reducing violence in society. This is not just a gun issue. It’s a societal issue. The United States is rated the 42nd most violent country in the world using the Peace Index from World Population Review.

We framed the issue as part of an ongoing struggle with mental illness even before Covid-19, and the lockdowns only worsened our collective health. It seems as if we have been collectively traumatized. We asked:


With the holiday season upon us, what can we do now to make 2023 a happier, healthier, less violent year?

More specifically ...

  1. What are the underlying causes of the violence?
  2. If we are suffering from collective trauma, how do we heal that trauma?
  3. What steps can we take as a society to turn people away from violence?

Below is a sample of responses. On a curious note – we normally receive 80 percent of our responses from men. This week, our respondents were 60 percent from women. On average, the responses we received were also much longer than normal. We’ve done our best to capture the essence of longer replies, editing for length and clarity.

Suzanne St. John-Crane:

  1. Hopelessness. Fear. Mental illness.
  2. Philanthropy and the public sector need to invest in healing circles - Truth and Reconciliation model, time and space to practice listening.
  3. Love your neighbor, pay attention, serve the least of our brothers and sisters.

Cynthia Tun:

I teach African-American and Latino history in an adult education program in Connecticut.

  1. The violence that we are seeing in our country is an offshoot from failed Reconstruction after the Civil War. It is based in hatred, bigotry and fear. Many of us have been brainwashed or subject to “coercive persuasion” to believe that it is good to own guns and that guns are okay for everyone.
  2. I believe we suffer from collective trauma. Some suffer more than others. I believe that the Trump presidency was traumatic along with the Covid pandemic. Both caused our country to change. Acknowledging the changes and grieving them is one way to recover.
  3. Turning people away from violence can be difficult when people have decided that violence is the answer to their problems. When they now believe that their group memberships and gun ownership makes them stronger, thus helping them to feel empowered. The CDC has released a pamphlet that provides some guidelines for helping youth turn away from violence. Education is a major key. Community building. A feeling of belonging within the neighborhood, family or school. Help children to feel safe. Etc.

Elaine Fraticelli:

The biggest propagator of violence in our country is the current radicalized version of free speech. Speech fFree of all consequences" allows hurtful, hate-based language and opinions to flourish and spread like a Covid-19 of mental health. Now that radical groups cry oppression every time their bigoted views are silenced, the rest of us have decided to tiptoe on ice instead of shutting them down and standing up to them. Our kids and anyone at a mentally unstable point in their life are bombarded with hateful language or see others suffering from it. Things like pressuring suicide, threatening murder, and ideas of supremacy or "natural order" that dictates who gets to live and who dies take hold in a vulnerable mind and cause equally violent actions; an equal and opposite reaction. Groups of radicalized individuals have turned our right to freedom of speech (from government interference) into "freedom from any criticism or consequences."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In order to successfully combat this, every single person who is able to needs to decide today, right now, to stand up when they hear someone else being targeted by disgusting supremacist beliefs. In doing so one person sends a message to the entire audience that this "freedom of speech" has consequences. A social movement of intolerance of hateful speech starts with a decision everyone can make right now. Will you say "stop" to someone whose speech is intentionally harming someone? In a checkout line will you turn around and simply say "no" to someone behind you making comments about the inferior person behind them? Will you sit with and distract someone who’s being screamed at for their religion? Will you report hateful comments online and uplift the victim for being their own beautifully unique selves? Do something.

Eleanor Milburn:

Teaching men that anger is usually covering up sadness and fear, and that it is ok to feel sadness and fear.

Sherry Bitler:

  1. Mental health issues; violence within the family or other dysfunctional family issues; living in a violent neighborhood; poverty, especially in large urban environments; peer pressure; lack of educational and economic opportunities.
  2. There is collective trauma from living in violent communities.
  3. Getting our political representatives to confront the issue of the violence guns cause and to have them work on getting regulations in place. We need to regulate the gun industry as we do the car industry – insurance, training, licensing, and, like auto manufacturers, make it mandatory that gun manufacturers create safer guns as cars have been made safer. Then within the communities most impacted by violence, strong, guided educational opportunities from a young age; giving the community resources to combat some of the internal issues of the community; finding ways of engaging and training the community to be proactive in their communities against violence

Jonathan Denn:

Democrats are soft on crime after it happens, and Republicans are soft on eliminating the conditions for crime before it happens. It would be funny except that the U.S. has a crime rate about three times that of Britain or Canada. While there is some debate about the World Bank's income disparity Gini Coefficient one thing is clear, the U.S. government estimates the annual cost of crime to be between $600 billion and $1.4 trillion a year.

Here’s the sad punchline: Liberals recoil at cutting corporate taxes, and conservatives recoil at increasing the EITC — but they are essentially the same solution. The true cause of crime in this country is polarization.

Fred Lassiter:

It seems to me that the way to stem violence is to do all that we can to ensure that everyone has a chance for success, however one defines it. That starts with strong schools and a better social support system; i.e., better health care, affordable housing, job opportunities, food security. More jails and more police just treat the symptoms. More guns only exacerbate the problem. We need to look at the causes of violence and I am convinced that a lack of opportunity and an inadequate social safety network are at the root of violence. Of course, family values and social values play a big role. Like Bob Dylan said, "If you ain't got nothin' you got nothin' to lose."

Lee Shull (with a note about his friends whose children were killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting):

What are the underlying causes of violence? I often tell people it's not rocket science ... it's harder. The laws of physics govern rocket science, whereas understanding what causes people to be violent is extremely complex and not governed by laws of science; we're dealing with people and the complexities of the brain. Part of the complexity is whether we're talking about violence to others or violence to self (suicide), and there will be different reasons for each type of violence. Regarding violence to others, we need to dig deeper into our fear of "the other" and what they represent to us, e.g., fear of a multicultural society, fear of different viewpoints, fear of losing something (money, status, identity, etc.).

I think we suffer from collective trauma, whether due to any number or combination of Covid, mass shootings, hate crimes, or our divisive politics and rhetoric. Part of healing that trauma lies with minimizing it and working through it, understanding it may never subside, but we can strive to cope with it. I honestly don't know how to heal that trauma, but I suggest a start, decreasing the divisions in our society while increasing community and inclusion. We all have challenges that, to each of us, are the hardest things we've faced. Being more curious and less judgemental allows for grace in other people. I often use the phrase "moving from 'me' to 'we'" and the image of a raindrop in a puddle. If we can each reflect on our thoughts and behaviors and be kinder to and less judgemental of others, we can extend that out, like ripples to our family, friends, co-workers and community.

And given the daily reminder of mass shootings, the latest in Virginia just days ago, I forgot to mention that we need to address the following:

  • Why these mass shootings are almost all by white men.
  • Strict regulations on the weapons of war (and body armor) that have made it into our homes and everyday society.

Jim and Patsy Coldren

Until we, as a nation, can put resources into determining the answer to (1) we can go nowhere to answer (2) or (3).

Read More

Joe Biden being interviewed by Lester Holt

The day after calling on people to “lower the temperature in our politics,” President Biden resort to traditionally divisive language in an interview with NBC's Lester Holt.

YouTube screenshot

One day and 28 minutes

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

This is the latest in “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

One day.

One single day. That’s how long it took for President Joe Biden to abandon his call to “lower the temperature in our politics” following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. “I believe politics ought to be an arena for peaceful debate,” he implored. Not messages tinged with violent language and caustic oratory. Peaceful, dignified, respectful language.

Keep ReadingShow less

Project 2025: The Department of Labor

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, is an ambitious manifesto to redesign the federal government and its many administrative agencies to support and sustain neo-conservative dominance for the next decade. One of the agencies in its crosshairs is the Department of Labor, as well as its affiliated agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

Project 2025 proposes a remake of the Department of Labor in order to roll back decades of labor laws and rights amidst a nostalgic “back to the future” framing based on race, gender, religion and anti-abortion sentiment. But oddly, tucked into the corners of the document are some real nuggets of innovative and progressive thinking that propose certain labor rights which even many liberals have never dared to propose.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump on stage at the Republican National Convention

Former President Donald Trump speaks at the 2024 Republican National Convention on July 18.

J. Conrad Williams Jr.

Why Trump assassination attempt theories show lies never end

By: Michele Weldon: Weldon is an author, journalist, emerita faculty in journalism at Northwestern University and senior leader with The OpEd Project. Her latest book is “The Time We Have: Essays on Pandemic Living.”

Diamonds are forever, or at least that was the title of the 1971 James Bond movie and an even earlier 1947 advertising campaign for DeBeers jewelry. Tattoos, belief systems, truth and relationships are also supposed to last forever — that is, until they are removed, disproven, ended or disintegrate.

Lately we have questioned whether Covid really will last forever and, with it, the parallel pandemic of misinformation it spawned. The new rash of conspiracy theories and unproven proclamations about the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump signals that the plague of lies may last forever, too.

Keep ReadingShow less
Painting of people voting

"The County Election" by George Caleb Bingham

Sister democracies share an inherited flaw

Myers is executive director of the ProRep Coalition. Nickerson is executive director of Fair Vote Canada, a campaign for proportional representations (not affiliated with the U.S. reform organization FairVote.)

Among all advanced democracies, perhaps no two countries have a closer relationship — or more in common — than the United States and Canada. Our strong connection is partly due to geography: we share the longest border between any two countries and have a free trade agreement that’s made our economies reliant on one another. But our ties run much deeper than just that of friendly neighbors. As former British colonies, we’re siblings sharing a parent. And like actual siblings, whether we like it or not, we’ve inherited some of our parent’s flaws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitutional Convention

It's up to us to improve on what the framers gave us at the Constitutional Convention.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

It’s our turn to form a more perfect union

Sturner is the author of “Fairness Matters,” and managing partner of Entourage Effect Capital.

This is the third entry in the “Fairness Matters” series, examining structural problems with the current political systems, critical policies issues that are going unaddressed and the state of the 2024 election.

The Preamble to the Constitution reads:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

What troubles me deeply about the politics industry today is that it feels like we have lost our grasp on those immortal words.

Keep ReadingShow less