Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Young liberals convene to boost their generation's activism

Young liberals convene to boost their generation's activism

Andrew Gillum addressed his fellow Gen Xers: "You actually take time to say, 'If we had a couple of moments to dream, what would it look like?'"

Sara Swann

Hundreds of young progressives from across the country are coming together in downtown Washington this week, hoping to energize youth advocacy on the left in the 2020 campaign and beyond.

The first-ever Youth Action Summit 2020 — fittingly pronounced as "Yas"— kicked off Tuesday with a call for youth involvement in politics from Florida's Andrew Gillum, one of the nation's most prominent Democratic figures from Generation X.


At 23, while still a student at Florida A&M, Gillum became the youngest person ever elected to the Tallahassee city commission. He was elected mayor in 2014 when he was 35 and four years later lost the governorship by less than half a percentage point.

Gillum said he found a silver lining in his defeat: his contribution to boosting youth voter engagement. Three out every eight Floridians 18 to 29 voted in 2018, a whopping 15 percentage pointincrease from the previous gubernatorial election.

"The reason why we have chosen to invest so deeply in young people and the youth of our country is because for some reason y'all happen to be less encumbered," Gillum said. "You actually take time to say, 'If we had a couple of moments to dream, what would it look like?'"

He reminded the audience that two icons of the civil rights movement, Rep. John Lewis of Georgia and Martin Luther King Jr., were much younger than Gillum is now when they rose to national prominence in the 1960s.

"We are all benefactors of their sacrifice. My hope is that my children are going to be the benefactors of your sacrifice," Gillum said.

More than 200 young people involved in grassroots movements for electoral or issue-based reform attended the conference. Many of the groups these delegates represent are making a priority in the coming year of registering more young people and pushing legislation to expand access to the ballot box.

The two-day conference was put together by several progressive advocacy groups including the Alliance for Youth Action, NAACP Youth and College, NextGen America, Planned Parenthood Generation Action, Student Power, United We Dream and the Alliance for Youth Organizing.

Workshops are designed to promote best-practices for the progressive movements. For three panels on Tuesday, for example, activists divided up to learn different grassroots strategies for advancing their causes in statehouses under Republican, Democratic or split partisan control.

Other scheduled speakers included D.C.'s long-serving but nonvoting House delegate, Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton, whose first political appointment came at age 33, when she was tapped to head the New York City Human Rights Commission in the early 1970s; 31-year-old actor Kendrick Sampson; transgender activist Riley Knoxx; and Bruce Franks Jr., who turned a career as a rapper into a seat representing St. Louis in the statehouse.

The purpose of the inaugural Youth Action Summit is not to have each group compete for funds or attention, but rather to form a unique model for leadership and gathering, said Sarah Audelo, executive director of the Alliance for Youth Action.

"This is a space of leaders and visionaries," she said. "We will also work to make sure that each and every one of the elected on our ballot — whether it's for city council or attorney general or Senate — will uphold our values and vision for this country."


Read More

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values

FrameWorks Institute

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values: How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change, produced by the FrameWorks Institute, explores how widely shared yet politically contested values can be used to strengthen public support for systemic reform. Values are central to how advocates communicate the importance of their work, and they can motivate collective action toward big, structural changes. This has become especially urgent in a climate where executive orders are targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and some nonprofits are being labeled as threats based on their stated missions. Many civil society organizations are now grappling with how to communicate their values effectively and safely.

The report focuses on Fairness, Stability, and Freedom because they resonate across the U.S. public and are used by communicators across the political spectrum. Unlike values more closely associated with one ideological camp — such as Tradition on the right or Solidarity on the left — these three values are broadly recognizable but highly contested. Each contains multiple variants, and their impact depends on how clearly advocates define them and how they are paired with specific issues.

Keep ReadingShow less
America’s Human Rights Reports Face A Reckoning Ahead of Feb. 25th
black and white labeled bottle
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

America’s Human Rights Reports Face A Reckoning Ahead of Feb. 25th

The Trump administration has already moved to erase evidence of enslavement and abuse from public records. It has promoted racially charged imagery attacking Michelle and Barack Obama. But the anti-DEI campaign does not stop at symbolic politics or culture-war spectacle. It now threatens one of the United States’ most important accountability tools: the State Department’s annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.

Quiet regulatory changes have begun to hollow out this vital instrument, undermining America’s ability to document abuse, support victims, and hold perpetrators to account. The next reports are due February 25, 2026. Whether they appear on time—and what may be scrubbed or withheld—remains an open question.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reducing the Influence of Money in Presidential Politics is Within Our Reach, from where we Least Expect it: the Electoral College

American flag funnel with money

Illustration provided

Reducing the Influence of Money in Presidential Politics is Within Our Reach, from where we Least Expect it: the Electoral College

Reducing the influence of money pouring into presidential politics since the 2010 Citizens United decision may actually be possible by addressing the "winner-take-all" (WTA) structure of the Electoral College. By changing how electoral votes are allocated, the incentive to concentrate money in a few swing states could be reduced.

The winner-take-all (WTA) feature of the Electoral College narrows the focus of massive campaign expenditures in a “Funnel Effect”* to a handful of closely divided battleground states. Because candidates have little to gain from spending in states where they are comfortably ahead or hopelessly behind, they concentrate all their financial resources on 15 or 16 states, or in some cycles, as few as seven key swing states. All this could change if the "battleground state" phenomenon were taken away from the wealthy, as the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) would accomplish.

Keep ReadingShow less