Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Watching the Jan. 6 hearings through the lens of both accountability and healing

Cassidy Hutchinson

Cassidy Hutchinson, a top former aide to Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, testifies before the committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection Tuesday.

Mandel Ngan-Pool/Getty Images

Roig is the chief network weaver atThe Horizons Project and the chair of the board of theAlliance for Peacebuilding.

“How did we get to this point?”

That’s how the third day of the Jan. 6, 2021, hearings began on June 16. Many Americans are asking the same question, with a mix of exhaustion, exasperation and alarm that our country has devolved to the heightened levels of violence and dysfunction that the select committee has outlined thus far. It has been painful to rewatch the violence that took place at the Capitol, but also to hear the personal stories of the violent threats and intimidation unleashed on elections officials and poll workers throughout the country.

One of the thorniest questions of our times is: How will we come together to reckon with the clear and present danger of the growing authoritarian threat in the United States, while also healing a fractured nation dealing with collective trauma, distrust, outrage and despair? The answer is that we must do both. While there are clearly urgent legal and political imperatives required in the short term, actions and organizing focused on truth-telling and justice will not be unfolding in a vacuum. They must form the foundations needed for long-term cultural and institutional transformations to take place.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter


As we engage in conversations about the Jan. 6 hearings throughout the nation, therefore, we have an opportunity to hold these tensions between accountability and healing, recognizing the importance of upholding the rule of law – while at the same time acknowledging the need to find ways to come together as a nation – as the only way forward. The path of truth, justice – and eventually societal repair – that will come after the hearings will be a long and messy road, but how this work unfolds with care for each other as citizens is an equally important ingredient to protecting our democracy.

First things first. The United States of America is a democratic republic founded on the rule of law, and in this system of government it is imperative that those who commit crimes must be held accountable, even –and especially – those given the privilege of serving at the highest levels of political power. The fact that these hearings are taking place at all is, in some ways, a triumph of our democratic institutions.

Although the committee appears to be narrowly focused on the actions and responsibility of former President Donald Trump and his top advisors, authoritarianism is a systemic threat that goes beyond any one person or persons. Whatever its partisan sources, the panel’s presentation of the evidence behind the attack on the Capitol is important for the American people and for future generations to know the truth. Our vigilance against the authoritarian threat must also include accountability at all levels of government and other sectors in society (such as media, corporations or faith leaders) who continue to spread or tolerate the same dangerous lies about the 2020 elections, or who are actively undermining both the integrity of and access to our electoral process.

For example, the Texas GOP recently voted in a platform that denies the validity of President Biden’s election. In New Mexico, a three-person commission in Otero County refused to certify the results of the primary elections, citing unsubstantiated complaints of Dominion voting-tabulating machines. By shining a light on the Jan. 6 hearings, we are acknowledging that the threats to America’s free and fair elections continue to spread throughout the country and must be confronted and defeated, especially from a larger number of courageous leaders within the Republican Party and conservative movement. In the near term, our gaze will have to shift from the hearings to focus on how the threats to democracy are metastasizing at the state level.

And yet as we work to establish the truth, we need to also prepare to heal. As we head into the midterm elections and rightly rely on both legal and political processes to demand accountability for anti-democratic rhetoric and behavior, our organizing tactics should also be grounded in a long-term democratic vision and commitment to societal healing that will lead to healthy pluralism.

Distinct from holding political leaders accountable is how we engage with our fellow citizens about these “threats to democracy,” including those who may be having a different reaction to the hearings. Some are completely certain, and some are confused, about the 2020 elections. Many people no longer believe in the democratic system – that every American has a right and freedom to vote for a leader of their choice – because they no longer trust any politicians. All of us are being fed a media diet of fear of the other side and are falling victim to cynicism of political theater.

Spanning from the Covid pandemic to economic insecurity, these are difficult times for many Americans, who are feeling excluded, isolated, humiliated, unsafe, angry or just doing their best to get by. Calls to “please watch the hearings” are often met by this segment of society with either disdain or frustration that the issues affecting their daily lives are not being prioritized. Reflecting on the importance of the hearings with this population can be quiet, one-on-one work. As Zimbabwean activist Pastor Evan Mawarire recently emphasized, “people don’t care how much you know, until they know how much you care.”

Lies cannot be allowed to stand in a healthy democracy. Building a bigger coalition of trusted messengers becomes some of the most important work in effectively discussing the current threats to our democracy. This is not appeasement, nor blindness to ongoing injustices and oppression in our society. This is an acknowledgement that one of the most tried and true tactics of any authoritarian regime is to divide and conquer, and to keep people confused and distrustful of each other. Part of the equation of protecting democracy, therefore, is the work it will take to break this cycle, to reinforce our shared identities as Americans, to rise above partisanship and to see past any one electoral cycle.

Programs like those led by Urban Rural Action, and the United Vision Project are creating bridges and helping Americans see that we can come together to find common ground and take action on issues we care about most, without centering our ideological identities. These kinds of programs directly combat authoritarianism that succeeds when people feel like they are powerless to change things. The way that we organize together across difference, centering restorative relationships within our communities where multiple and intersecting identities are celebrated in all our complexities, allows Americans to remember that we belong to each other, and that we all want to live in a society that functions where we are free to work, love and flourish.

We cannot merely vote our way out of the current democratic crisis, but the Jan. 6 hearings provide an entry point to build upon our common values and vision for the country. This moment is an important opportunity for a broader pro-democracy coalition to form. Citizens must feel that their voices matter and are counted, so voting integrity and participation is essential to democracy. At the same time, saving democracy cannot be a partisan undertaking and we cannot engage with our fellow citizens only as voters. Thinking only in terms of “persuadables” or “the moveable middle,” for example, can be a dehumanizing mindset that ignores the complexities of Americans’ beliefs and values. That, in turn, keeps us in a trap of “us versus them.” Experts who study successful pro-democracy movements have shown that progressives and conservatives must come together to stop those who are actively changing the rules of the game to stay in power undemocratically.

The time to act is now. Heeding the warning that our democracy is on the “knife’s edge” as Judge Michael Luttig stated in his written testimony, requires what some peacebuilding experts refer to as a “multiple parallel approach” – acknowledging the diversity of actors and initiatives to be galvanized within complex systems. Accountability for crimes committed must come out of the hearings. Political leaders must be more courageous and supported to expel the anti-democratic forces from within their ranks. All of us must vote and support pro-democracy candidates in the upcoming elections. And, at the same time, citizens must center our shared longer-term goal of healing our toxically divided nation if we are going to uphold our democracy.

Read More

Eric Adams

New York Mayor Eric Adams is seen leaving Manhattan federal court on Sept. 27.

Andrea Renault/Star Max/GC Images)

Eric Adams is trying on Donald Trump’s playbook

Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.

It’s the go-to play nowadays.

If you’re a politician collared for alleged crimes, feign indignation, call it a “conspiracy,” blame the “corrupt” Department of Justice, and refuse to resign.

New York Mayor Eric Adams has been indicted on five federal charges related to 2021 campaign contributions, wire fraud, and bribery. The scathing 57-page indictment was unsealed on Thursday, and according to the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Damian Williams, Adams was “showered” with gifts from foreign entities — namely Turkey — that he knew were illegal.

Keep ReadingShow less
Vote counting in Maricopa County, Ariz.

Maricopa County (Ariz.) Elections Department staff count votes on Nov. 5, 2020.

Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images

We need federal officials to help keep an eye on vote counting

Herbits is an American businessman and former consultant to several secretaries of defense.

Former President Donald Trump has not yet committed to accepting the results of the 2024 election. He continuously maintains that the 2020 election was stolen, despite 60 failed lawsuits. And his behavior on Jan. 6, 2021 demonstrates beyond any doubt that he has no sense of responsibility to democracy.

Moreover, report after report reveals various tactics that his supporters around the country are preparing so they can to prevent him from losing again this time — focusing on voting constraints and ballot processing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ripped MAGA sign
Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Ask Rich: An ex-Trump supporter and MAGA activist answers your questions

Logis, a former member of the Republican Party and conservative pundit, is the founder of Perfect Our Union, an organization dedicated to healing political traumatization and building diverse, pro-democracy alliances. This is the first in a series of articles titled “Ask Rich.”

I left MAGA in the summer of 2022. As we get to know each other, I'll get into more specifics as to why I left. Yes, I did agree with some of former President Donald Trump's policies; and, I assure you, most Trump voters are good, decent people who had some valid reasons for supporting him. However, I feel I was led astray, but accept full responsibility for my decisions.

When my doubts about supporting Trump and the MAGA movement commenced in summer 2021, I began diversifying my news, opinion and information sources; this dramatically bettered my understanding of the nuances of complex political, cultural and social issues.

With that in mind, here’s what readers can expect from "Ask Rich":

Keep ReadingShow less
George Santos

Why was it so easy for Santos to lie throughout his campaign? As it turns out, it’s pretty easy to scam a broken system.

Mandel Ngan/Getty Images

George Santos and a system built for corruption

Nate is a communications consultant for RepresentUs, a nonpartisan organization focused on minimizing corruption in the U.S. political system.

In 2009, comedian Robin Williams quipped, “Politicians should wear sponsor jackets like NASCAR drivers.” Just one year later, the Supreme Court decided to drive in a different direction. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission opened the floodgates to dark money, exacerbating our existing political corruption problem.

George Santos was expelled from the House of Representatives on Dec. 1 for defrauding campaign donors and members of his district, but the entire saga should be seen as a broader indictment of a broken system that enables (and seemingly encourages) political corruption. Santos was enabled by insufficient reporting laws and ineffective federal oversight. As the Campaign Legal Center reported, “Dysfunction at the FEC has reduced transparency in our elections and faith in our political system.”

Keep ReadingShow less