Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Re-imagining Title IX: An opportunity to flex our civic muscles

Opinion

Title IX

Sam Hiatt of the women's soccer team OL Reign sports a patch celebrating 50 years of Title IX.

Steph Chambers/Getty Images

Solomon is on the faculty of Stanford University's design school and a creator of civic futures programs like Vote by Design, Building America’s Teammates and AllVoteNoPlay.org,

In anticipation of Title IX’s upcoming anniversary, I sat down with Dr. Victoria Jackson, a sports historian and clinical assistant professor of history in the School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies at Arizona State University. Jackson is also a former Pac-12 and NCAA champion runner. She writes and speaks about the intersection of sport and society, exploring how the games we play (and watch) tell us much about the communities – local, national and global – in which we live.

As a civic futurist and creator of the AllVoteNoPlay.org civic playbook for student athletes, I wanted to explore the historic significance of Title IX and the implications of this 50-year milestone for the future of women’s athletics. Jackson’s Ph.D. dissertation explores the history and impact of Title IX, and she is actively working on programs and research to make college sports more equitable, more sustainable, and more inclusive.


My running times may be slower than Jackson’s (by a lot), but we share a passion for using the college sports experience as an opportunity to not just grow athletes, but to grow citizens and leaders who contribute positively to society.

Lisa Kay Solomon: As we approach the 50th anniversary of Title IX on June 23, would you give us an overview of the legislation and its enormous impact on women’s sports? We’ve seen Sports Illustrated and ESPN focus on the anniversary, and prominent brands run ads on women’s sports, but I’m not sure if people really know the history of this legislation.

Victoria Jackson: I think it’s super important to remember that Title IX – the legislation itself – was not originally about sports. Fundamentally it’s legislation focused on civil rights – providing equal access to educational opportunities – which also include equal opportunity to play school sports.

When we frame Title IX using the language of its original mission of access to education and opportunity, it allows us to ground collegiate sports as a developmental activity that sits within the context of a college experience. Title IX helped expand this access to women, giving everyone the right to participate. More than anything, it’s a landmark legislation about inclusion.

Title IX is both inspirational and aspirational. If you're looking at the things people advocate for regarding women's rights, so much of it rests on education and using sports to develop your body for yourself.

What do you want all college athletes, especially women’s teams, to know about Title IX?

We've been seeing a lot of universities, sports conferences and major brands roll out Title IX programming to celebrate this important anniversary. But a lot of the framing and coverage is misleading about what the legislation is really about. The narrative seems to be a version of: “It was bad for women in sports, and now it's great thanks to Title IX. Women didn’t used to be able to play basketball, and now they can. Isn’t that wonderful?” It’s obviously more complicated than that.

One thing I always stress when I’m talking to student athletes is that there’s a responsibility that comes with being a woman in sports. You need to know the people that came before you who did the work to get to the place where it is now. And that we’re still working hard to get to where we need to go. Women’s equal participation in sports is not something any of us can take for granted.

We are in a period of erosion in all sorts of ways – not just in a sporting sense, but more broadly around women’s rights, bodily autonomy, and basic safety. Sports are the frontlines of that, and using your body for your own power and pleasure is a thing that a lot of women athletes take for granted in 2022 but shouldn't.

We all need to keep doing that work so that we can continue to protect what we have, and hopefully continue to expand opportunities.

Can you give us more context on the origin of Title IX and its relation to women’s liberation, as well as its implications for this moment?

Title IX’s anniversary is on June 23, which is approximately the same week that the Supreme Court may be overturning Roe v. Wade. If you talk to women who played sports in the ’70s and ’80s, they talk about Roe and Title IX almost interchangeably, and that you need both to really support women’s college sports and opportunities for women in higher education. This is an important part of the story that gets overlooked.

There are a lot of women athletes and coaches who are uncomfortable thinking of sports as a political act, especially as our environment has become so polarized. But the right to play sports and the right to make choices about your own body are so linked, and neither are set policy. They can’t be taken for granted. So, I think part of this important moment is to remind athletes that having the right to play sports in schools is a political process, too. And that’s a powerful stance because it means we can use our agency and our voice to influence it. It’s not something to shy away from.

You have so many women athletes talking about how sports isn’t political: “We're just trying to celebrate women in sports.” Well, sports are political. The right to play involves systems of power, access, and influence. So when we talk about athletes in the context of this anniversary, we have to talk about all of that. It’s not just a celebrity performative thing; it's about recognizing all the work that went into paving the way for these rights and opportunities, and the necessity for ongoing work.

What are some ways that women’s sports teams can honor this milestone?

There’s a lot of terrific media being created around it that I think would be great for more student athletes to watch and discuss. ESPN did a powerful segment around Mother’s Day celebrating mother-and-daughter duos. My friend and fellow historian Amira Rose Davis did a terrific piece looking at Title IX in a broader American cultural context. And USA Today did a comprehensive series looking at how Title IX is falling short of its promise.

I would love to see the conversations continue in all locker rooms – women’s and men’s – when students come back to campus for the new school year. We’re coming up on a really important voting year. There’s a lot at stake for women on the ballot – both in the big races, and more importantly, the local races – that will dictate rules around access to reproductive rights and general freedoms.

I really hope that coaches and athletes take time to acknowledge the responsibility and agency they have to protect what we have, to avoid letting these rights slide, and to pave the way for future athletes to enjoy even more freedom and access. Women deserve more resources and better opportunities, not less.

I couldn't agree more. Wouldn’t it be amazing to have 100 percent participation in the upcoming elections from all women’s sports teams? That would be a true tribute to Title IX and definitely a milestone moment to celebrate!

Curious how to bring more awareness and conversations about Title IX to your teams and communities? Check out the #AllVoteNoPlay civic drill on Title IX , and some of the resources below.

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less