Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Women make strides in government, but still far from parity

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer; International Women's Day

Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer is one of nine women currently serving as governor in the United States.

Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images

As the world celebrates International Women’s Day today, women remain significantly underrepresented at all levels of U.S. government and around the world.

Last year, Kamala Harris became the first female vice president in U.S. history, and President Biden received significant praise for achieving gender balance in his Cabinet. And if the Senate confirms Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, four of the nine justices will be women for the first time.

But elsewhere — in Congress, statewide offices, legislatures and local governments — women hold a far smaller share of elected positions.


There are 26 women serving as elected head of state or head of government around the world (out of 181 countries surveyed), according to UN Women, a United Nations organization focused on gender equity. While the United States is not on that list, it is among the 14 countries that have gender-balanced cabinets.

While 51 percent of the Americans are women, the Center for American Women in Politics at Rutgers University found that just 27 percent of members of Congress are women, including 106 Democrats and 39 Republicans, slightly outpacing the rest of the world, according to UN Women. But the United States is far from a leader.

"In fact, 20 years ago the U.S. ranked 46th among nations for women's representation but in 2022 the U.S. is tied for 72nd place with Egypt and the Philippines," said Cynthia Richie Terrell, executive director of the advocacy organization RepresentWomen. "Countries ranked above the U.S. don't have better qualified women, rather, they have electoral systems that create more opportunities for women to run and win."

Moving down a level, women perform better in state elections — just not for the top job. While women hold 31 percent of statewide elective positions, they hold just nine governorships. But 44 percent of lieutenant governors and 31 percent over other statewide elected officeholders are women.

Terrell believes that the higher rate of women as lieutenant governors is the result of strategic campaign decisions by men running for governor.

"It's also notable that male gubernatorial candidates of both parties are more likely than not to choose a woman as a running mate because they know intuitively that they must appeal to a wide array of voters to win elections," she said.

Women control 31 percent of legislative seats, performing slightly better in state Houses than state Senates. That share has been slowly risin g since 1980, but Nevada is the only state where women have achieved at least parity (they currently hold 59 percent of the legislature there). Women have the smallest share, just 23 percent, in Arkansas.

Eleven Democratic and four Republican women have the top position in state Senates, but there are just six women who serve as speaker in state Houses (five Democrats, one Republican).

CAWP also analyzed local governments and found that 31 percent of all officeholders in cities with populations greater than 10,000 are women. One-quarter of cities with populations above 30,000 have women as governors, including 31 of the 100 most populous cities.

UN Women has data on local government in 133 countries, in which 36 percent of elected members are women.

RepresentWomen works for structural changes to the electoral system that would enable more women to win elections.

"We must employ strategies that address the structural barriers women face so that more women of all demographic groups can run, win, serve, and lead. To ensure that more women run, we need political parties to recruit more women to run and donors to commit to funding their campaigns," Terrell said. "For these women to win, we need to upgrade our antiquated electoral system and replace it with ranked choice voting so that women have a greater chance of winning when they run."

She added that additional changes, such as onsite child care and other benefits are necessary to allow women to serve once elected.

Read More

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less