Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Hope and momentum: Women lead the charge for gender parity in politics

Maya Harris poses with event attendees

Maya Harris (second from left), a prominent policy advocate and sister of Vice President Kamala Harris, was a featured speaker at an event organized by RepresentWomen and Vote Run Lead.

RepresentWomen

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum.

The struggle for gender parity in politics is far from over, but this week I felt a surge of hope for the future. This optimism stems not only from the increasing prominence of women in political leadership, exemplified by the potential for a woman to win the 2024 presidential election but also from a powerful gathering I attended on Tuesday.


Organized by RepresentWomen and Vote Run Lead, the luncheon was held as an ancillary event to the Democratic National Convention. "Women are the Winning Strategy: Solutions from the States" featured influential speakers such as Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and policy advocate Maya Harris, along with women leaders from across the country.

The gathering not only highlighted the critical role of women in shaping the political landscape but also provided a fertile ground for fostering female leadership and activism.

A shared mission

RepresentWomen and Vote Run Lead are united in their commitment to dismantling the barriers that have historically hindered women's participation in politics.

RepresentWomen focuses on structural reforms, including ranked-choice voting and gender quotas, aiming to create a political environment where women can thrive. Vote Run Lead complements this mission by offering training and resources to women aspiring to run for office, equipping them with the skills needed to navigate and succeed in political campaigns.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The synergy between these two organizations is a powerful force in the movement for gender parity. RepresentWomen tackles the systemic issues that keep women out of politics, while Vote Run Lead empowers individual women to step into the political arena with confidence and competence. Together, they are not just advocating for change — they are actively creating it.

Event highlights and speakers

The event was a convergence of powerful voices and perspectives from across the country. Harris, a prominent policy advocate, lawyer, and sister of presidential candidate Kamala Harris, kicked off the speaker lineup, emphasizing the power of strategic planning and community support. Her words were a rallying cry for women to be both participants and strategists in the political process.

Lee, known for her trailblazing career and steadfast advocacy for social justice, shared her journey from a young non-voter to a leading political figure. Her story, which began with her work alongside the legendary Shirley Chisholm, served as a poignant reminder that political engagement can start at any point and lead to profound impact.

As someone who works in the political space but was not initially planning to attend the DNC, I found myself at this luncheon somewhat last minute, arriving solo. Yet, I wasn’t alone for long. The RepresentWomen and Vote Run Lead staff extended warm welcomes, and there was quick camaraderie among the attendees.

I found myself seated with members of the New Mexico delegation. They were welcoming and enthusiastic, and I quickly recognized Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver from our just-published Faces of Democracy piece profiling her work. She later addressed the gathering, giving an inspiring call to action and introducing the rest of my table of New Mexico leaders. Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D) also spoke, giving a passionate speech that highlighted New Mexico’s achievement as one of the most gender-equal legislatures in the country.

Strategies and impact: Turning inspiration into action

The event was not just a celebration of women's achievements in politics; it was a call to action for gender parity in elected representation and continued advocacy at all levels of governance.

A central theme of the event was the empowerment of women through increased representation and leadership opportunities. The speakers underscored the necessity of diversity in political offices, arguing that a government reflective of its populace is better equipped to address varied societal needs. This message resonated with attendees, many of whom expressed a renewed commitment to pursuing political roles.

Beyond inspiration, the event offered practical and straightforward “asks.” First, to engage in conversation with friends, family and colleagues about the importance of supporting qualified women candidates such as Kamala Harris, who has the potential to break the glass ceiling in national politics.

Second, to encourage women to run for office without waiting for multiple invitations. This was symbolized by the political buttons offered by Vote Run Lead on each table that read, “Run as you are.” The phrase encapsulates a vital message: Women face specific barriers to running, winning and serving, but while we rally for changes to address those barriers, specifically through implementing ranked-choice voting and instating fair legislative practices, organizations like Vote Run Lead can help women to run now, despite those barriers and challenges.

The event's impact was evident in the enthusiastic engagement of the participants. I know I am not the only one who left the luncheon with a clearer vision of their political goals and the confidence to pursue them. As we look to the future, it is imperative to continue supporting initiatives like those of RepresentWomen and Vote Run Lead, which play a vital role in dismantling barriers to women's political participation.

Embracing the momentum: A commitment to gender parity

I’m embracing the momentum generated by this event and committed to working to ensure that women are not only present but prominent in the political arena. As co-publisher of The Fulcrum, I’m dedicated to amplifying the voices of women, not just from the realm of elected representatives and administrators, but also within the field of civic reform and engagement. The journey toward gender parity is ongoing, and with sustained effort and commitment, we can achieve a political system that truly reflects the diversity and strength of our society.

This event was more than just a gathering; it was a catalyst for change. It reminded us all that the fight for gender parity in politics is not just about breaking the tallest glass ceiling in American politics — it’s about ensuring that women have the tools, resources and support they need to not only enter the political arena but to thrive at all levels of service.

We can move forward from this inspiring week carrying the momentum with us, working together to create a political system where every woman has the opportunity to lead and make a difference.

Read More

An illustration of diverse people around a heart with the design of the American flag.
An illustration of diverse people around a heart with the design of the American flag.
Getty Images, wildpixel

The Next Hundred Days: America's Latest Test of Democracy

For decades, we have watched America wrestle with its demons. Sometimes, she has successfully pinned them down. Other times, the demons have slipped beyond her grasp. Yet, America has always remained in the ring. There is no difference right now, and the stakes couldn't be higher.

Across America, from small-town council meetings to state legislatures, there's a coordinated effort to roll back the clock on civil rights, geopolitical relations, and the global economy. It's not subtle, and it's not accidental. The targeting of immigrants and citizens of color has become so normalized that we risk becoming numb to it. For example, what happened in Springfield, Ohio, late last year? When national politicians started pushing rhetoric against Haitian immigrants, it wasn't just local politics at play. It was a test balloon, a preview of talking points soon echoed in halls of government and media outlets nationwide. Thus, this is how discrimination, intolerance, and blatant hate go mainstream or viral—it starts small, tests the waters, and spreads like a virus through our body politic and social system.

Keep ReadingShow less
Future of the National Museum of the American Latino is Uncertain

PRESENTE! A Latino History of the United States

Credit: National Museum of the American Latino

Future of the National Museum of the American Latino is Uncertain

The American Museum of the Latino faces more hurdles after over two decades of advocacy.

Congress passed legislation to allow for the creation of the Museum, along with the American Women’s History Museum, as part of the Smithsonian Institution in an online format. Five years later, new legislation introduced by Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) wants to build a physical museum for both the Latino and women’s museums but might face pushback due to a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fairness, Not Stigma, for Transgender Athletes

People running.

Getty Images, Pavel1964

Fairness, Not Stigma, for Transgender Athletes

President Trump’s campaign and allies spent $21 million of campaign spending on attack ads against transgender people. With that level of spending, I was shocked to find out it was not a top concern for voters of either party, but it continued to prevail as a campaign priority.

Opponents of transgender participation in sports continue to voice their opinions, three months into the Trump presidency. Just last month, the Trump administration suspended $175 million in federal funding to Penn State over a transgender swimmer. $175 million is a bit dramatic over one swimmer, or in the case of the entire NCAA, fewer than 10 athletes. Even Governor Gavin Newsom was recently under fire for sharing his views on his podcast. Others, like Rep. Nancy Mace, have also caught on to the mediagenic nature of transphobia right now. “You want penises in women's bathrooms, and I'm not going to have it,” she said in a U.S. House hearing last month. I had no clue who Nancy Mace was prior to her notorious views on LGBTQ+ rights. Frankly, her flip from being a supporter of LGBTQ+ rights to shouting “Tr**ny” in a hearing seems less like a change of opinion and more of a cry for attention.

Keep ReadingShow less
Unit Cohesion is a Pretext for Exclusion

The transgender flag on a military uniform.

Getty Images, Cunaplus_M.Faba

Unit Cohesion is a Pretext for Exclusion

In the annals of military history, the desire for uniformity has often been wielded as a sword against inclusion. This tendency resurfaced dramatically when President Donald Trump, shortly after taking office, signed an executive order, purportedly rooted in concerns about unit cohesion, that banned transgender individuals from serving in the armed forces. It was challenged and blocked by a federal judge on March 18, who described the ban as “soaked in animus and dripping with pretext.” On March 27, a second judge issued an injunction on the ban, calling it “unsupported, dramatic and facially unfair exclusionary policy” (the Trump administration asked the 9th Circuit to stay the ruling; they were denied on April 1). It turns out that the argument that introducing any minority into military ranks would disrupt unit cohesion is practically a cliché, with similar claims having been made against integrating black men, women, and then openly gay service members. It is a tale as old as time. But that’s just it–it’s just a tale. Don’t believe it.

The military top brass have, at times, insisted that the integration of minority groups would undermine the effectiveness of our armed forces, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Air Force General Henry Arnold wrote in 1941 that “the use of women pilots serves no military purpose,” only to have “nothing but praise” for them by 1944, after having served with them. Regarding integrating women into combat roles in 1993, Congress members argued that “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect…women.” Of course, they also offered the even more convenient cover story that integration would be “disruptive to unit cohesion.” Similarly, although many claimed that “letting gays serve openly would ruin [unit cohesion],” the resistance was found to be “based on nothing” except “our own prejudices and . . . fears.” Dozens of studies conducted by the U.S. military and 25 other nations confirmed the presence of gay soldiers had no impact on unit cohesion. These results were ignored in “the service of an ideology equating heterosexuality with bravery and patriotism.” Unit cohesion is a simple—though thinly veiled—rationale.

Keep ReadingShow less