Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Which legislatures are most reflective of the gender balance in their states?

Nevada Assembly

The Nevada Assembly has the highest percentage women in office, significantly higher than the share of women in the state population.

4kodiak/Getty Images

The population in every state is near-evenly split among men and women. But the same cannot be said of most state legislatures.

Only five state houses have a gender balance within 10 percent of the population – which is better than state senates, where just three are within that margin, according to research conducted by Vote Run Lead, which trains women to run for office.

“The state of our democracy – especially at the state level – is not of and by the people. Women are remarkably underrepresented in our state legislatures,” said Erin Vilardi, founder and CEO of Vote Run Lead. “Without a serious intervention it will be decades to hundreds of years before we reach gender parity.”


Nevada is the clear outlier among the 50 states, as it is the only place where women are over-represented in a chamber, with women holding 68.3 percent of the seats in the state Assembly while being 49.9 percent of the population. It is the only one near the top of the list for both chambers.

The Nevada Senate has a negative 4.9 percentage point gap between women in office and women in the population, trailing just Arizona (+3.3 points) and Rhode Island (-3.9 points).

Vilardi identified three reasons Nevada elects such a high rate of women to legislative offices: a strong network of women recruiting and supporting other women, a smaller legislature than most states (it has the third fewest seats, after Alaska and Delaware), strong role models in U.S. Sens. Catherine Cortez Mastro and Jacky Rosen. Minnesota and New Hampshire are the only other states with two women senators.

“Obviously, overall there is a readiness and willingness of voters to vote for women,” Vilardi said.

Among the five “close to equal representation” states on the house side, three are have a slightly higher share of women in office compared to the general population:

  • Nevada at +2.1 points.
  • New Mexico at +1.7 points.
  • Colorado at +1.2 points.

The are two are slightly below even: Maine (-3.4 points) and Maryland (-4.1 points),

Vilardi explained that Democratic-leaning states tend to have more women in office, but party is not the only reason some states are closer to parity than others.

“Another trend is that in some states, like Colorado, there is a long history of deep organizing by women’s groups – including Vote Run Lead, as well as center-left infrastructure like Emerge America – that have prioritized women and people of color over the last decade,” she said.

At the other end of the spectrum, women are “severely underrepresented” in 18 states with South Carolina the furthest from equal. Just 10.8 percent of legislators are women, even though women make up 51.6 percent of the population. South Carolina does slightly better on the House side, with a gap of 32.2 points.

Tennessee has the biggest gap on that side, with a 40-point gap.

Overall, 31 percent of state legislators are women.

“Recruiting, training and candidate support are necessary to achieve a better balance and we can go even further. That means examine the systemic changes that would propel more women forward,” said Vilardi, who identified specific ways to closing the gap. “This includes more ranked-choice voting elections, where we see more women run and more women win, as well as changes to campaign finance laws that would support women’s often small fundraising networks (as well as candidates of color and working class candidates who tend to have smaller dollar donors, too).”

When drilling down, even fewer states have women of color in office at a rate anywhere near the states’ breakdowns. Not one state senate reaches the “close to equal” range and six states – Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Dakota and Pennsylvania – do not have any women of color working in that chamber.

Hawaii has the highest percentage of women of color (four in 10) and the most in the state Senate (32 percent). It’s state House ranks fourth (21.6 percent).

Four states ranked as equal or nearly equal on the House side: Nevada, Washington, Oreon and Wisconsin.

See all the data.

Read More

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., January 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Summary

On June 9, 2025, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), dismissed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Secretary Kennedy claimed the move was necessary to eliminate “conflicts of interest” and restore public trust in vaccines, which he argued had been compromised by the influence of pharmaceutical companies. However, this decision strays from precedent and has drawn significant criticism from medical experts and public health officials across the country. Some argue that this shake-up undermines scientific independence and opens the door to politicized decision-making in vaccine policy.

Background: What Is ACIP?

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is a federal advisory group that helps guide national vaccine policy. Established in 1964, it has over 60 years of credibility as an evidence-based body of medical and scientific experts. ACIP makes official recommendations on vaccine schedules for both children and adults, determining which immunizations are required for school entry, covered by health insurance, and prioritized in public health programs. The committee is composed of specialists in immunology, epidemiology, pediatrics, infectious disease, and public health, all of whom are vetted for scientific rigor and ethical standards. ACIP’s guidance holds national weight, shaping both public perception of vaccines and the policies of institutions like schools, hospitals, and insurers.

Keep ReadingShow less
MQ-9 Predator Drones Hunt Migrants at the Border
Way into future, RPA Airmen participate in Red Flag 16-2 > Creech ...

MQ-9 Predator Drones Hunt Migrants at the Border

FT HUACHUCA, Ariz. - Inside a windowless and dark shipping container turned into a high-tech surveillance command center, two analysts peered at their own set of six screens that showed data coming in from an MQ-9 Predator B drone. Both were looking for two adults and a child who had crossed the U.S.-Mexico border and had fled when a Border Patrol agent approached in a truck.

Inside the drone hangar on the other side of the Fort Huachuca base sat another former shipping container, this one occupied by a drone pilot and a camera operator who pivoted the drone's camera to scan nine square miles of shrubs and saguaros for the migrants. Like the command center, the onetime shipping container was dark, lit only by the glow of the computer screens.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Trump 2020 flag outside of a home.

As Trump’s second presidency unfolds, rural America—the foundation of his 2024 election win—is feeling the sting. From collapsing export markets to cuts in healthcare and infrastructure, those very voters are losing faith.

Getty Images, ablokhin

Trump’s 2.0 Actions Have Harmed Rural America Who Voted for Him

Daryl Royal, the 20-year University of Texas football coach, once said, “You've gotta dance with them that brung ya.” The modern adaptation of that quote is “you gotta dance with the one who brought you to the party.” The expression means you should remain loyal to the people or things that helped you succeed.

Sixty-three percent of America’s 3,144 counties are predominantly rural, and Donald Trump won 93 percent of those counties in 2024. Analyses show that rural counties have become increasingly solid Republican, and Trump’s margin of victory within rural America reached a new high in the 2024 election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands Off Our Elections: States and Congress, Not Presidents, Set the Rules
white concrete dome museum

Hands Off Our Elections: States and Congress, Not Presidents, Set the Rules

Trust in elections is fragile – and once lost, it is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild. While Democrats and Republicans disagree on many election policies, there is broad bipartisan agreement on one point: executive branch interference in elections undermines the constitutional authority of states and Congress to determine how elections are run.

Recent executive branch actions threaten to upend this constitutional balance, and Congress must act before it’s too late. To be clear – this is not just about the current president. Keeping the executive branch out of elections is a crucial safeguard against power grabs by any future president, Democrat or Republican.

Keep ReadingShow less