Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ohio's latest voting trouble: Absentee ballot requests denied over signatures

Ohio ballot box

Ohio has allowed no-excuse absentee voting by mail since 2005. But at least 6,500 potential absentee voters had their applications turned down last year over problems with signatures.

Eric Thayer/Getty Images

More than 7,000 Ohioans were delayed or blocked in trying to get absentee ballots for last fall's local elections and ballot initiatives, entirely because of missing or unfamiliar signatures on their applications, The Associated Press reported Monday after analyzing records statewide.

Signature requirements, and the vagaries of matching the handwriting on file to the marks on a fresh form, are becoming a big issue as more and more places ease the rules early voting or otherwise conduct elections by mail.


Ohio, one of the nation's most populous electoral bellwethers, has allowed no-excuse absentee voting by mail since 2005, and another 33 states will do the same as of next year. The roster of states that conduct all elections by mail will grow to eight when Hawaii and Utah debut their systems in 2020. All those places say the idea is to boost turnout by making voting easier, but officials in the states with stricter rules say they're guarding against fraud.

At the center of the debate are signature rules and the subjective standards that officials — generally without any training as handwriting analysts — use to match the scratches on file with the squiggles on applications. Lawsuits are underway in Texas and Georgia after the American Civil Liberties Union won suits last year loosening the mail-in voting rules in California and New Hampshire.

After making public information requests to Ohio's 88 county boards of elections, the AP revealed that in almost a quarter of the counties (21), more than 6,500 absentee ballot applications were turned down flat because a signature was either missing or didn't match what was on file. Another five counties reported rejecting a combined 850 applications for other, unspecified reasons.

The records of just 12 counties showed no applications rejected because of signature issues. The rest, more than half the counties, said they had no records about the fate of rejected applications.

About one in six of Ohio's 8 million registered voters cast absentee ballots last year.

When he was a state legislator, Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose promoted legislation allowing voters to apply for absentee ballots online, which would obviate the need for a handwritten signature. The bill is on the agenda for the GOP-majority General Assembly to debate early next year.

The current law says a request for an absentee ballot "need not be in any particular form," although it also lists a valid signature among eight or more pieces of information required, depending on the type of election. (The signature requirements for a completed absentee ballot are even more strict.)


Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less