Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ohio's latest voting trouble: Absentee ballot requests denied over signatures

Ohio ballot box

Ohio has allowed no-excuse absentee voting by mail since 2005. But at least 6,500 potential absentee voters had their applications turned down last year over problems with signatures.

Eric Thayer/Getty Images

More than 7,000 Ohioans were delayed or blocked in trying to get absentee ballots for last fall's local elections and ballot initiatives, entirely because of missing or unfamiliar signatures on their applications, The Associated Press reported Monday after analyzing records statewide.

Signature requirements, and the vagaries of matching the handwriting on file to the marks on a fresh form, are becoming a big issue as more and more places ease the rules early voting or otherwise conduct elections by mail.


Ohio, one of the nation's most populous electoral bellwethers, has allowed no-excuse absentee voting by mail since 2005, and another 33 states will do the same as of next year. The roster of states that conduct all elections by mail will grow to eight when Hawaii and Utah debut their systems in 2020. All those places say the idea is to boost turnout by making voting easier, but officials in the states with stricter rules say they're guarding against fraud.

At the center of the debate are signature rules and the subjective standards that officials — generally without any training as handwriting analysts — use to match the scratches on file with the squiggles on applications. Lawsuits are underway in Texas and Georgia after the American Civil Liberties Union won suits last year loosening the mail-in voting rules in California and New Hampshire.

After making public information requests to Ohio's 88 county boards of elections, the AP revealed that in almost a quarter of the counties (21), more than 6,500 absentee ballot applications were turned down flat because a signature was either missing or didn't match what was on file. Another five counties reported rejecting a combined 850 applications for other, unspecified reasons.

The records of just 12 counties showed no applications rejected because of signature issues. The rest, more than half the counties, said they had no records about the fate of rejected applications.

About one in six of Ohio's 8 million registered voters cast absentee ballots last year.

When he was a state legislator, Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose promoted legislation allowing voters to apply for absentee ballots online, which would obviate the need for a handwritten signature. The bill is on the agenda for the GOP-majority General Assembly to debate early next year.

The current law says a request for an absentee ballot "need not be in any particular form," although it also lists a valid signature among eight or more pieces of information required, depending on the type of election. (The signature requirements for a completed absentee ballot are even more strict.)

Read More

Does either party actually want to win the Senate race in Texas?

US Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) speaks during an "Oversight and Government Reform" hearing on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 12, 2025. (Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Does either party actually want to win the Senate race in Texas?

One of the worst features of the election primary system in our polarized “Red vs. Blue” time is the tendency of primary voters to flock to the candidate they most want to “destroy” the other party, not the candidate best positioned to do so.

Let’s say a zombie is scratching at your door. You’ve got a shotgun, a handgun and your favorite frying pan. The shotgun has the greatest chance of success, the handgun — if one is careful and skilled — has a solid chance of working, and the frying pan? It probably won’t dispatch the threat but, come on, how cool would it be to take out a zombie with a frying pan? So, you go with that.

Keep ReadingShow less
artificial intelligence

Rather than blame AI for young Americans struggling to find work, we need to build: build new educational institutions, new retraining and upskilling programs, and, most importantly, new firms.

Surasak Suwanmake/Getty Images

Blame AI or Build With AI? Only One Approach Creates Jobs

We’re failing young Americans. Many of them are struggling to find work. Unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds topped 10.5% in August. Even among those who do find a job, many of them are settling for lower-paying roles. More than 50% of college grads are underemployed. To make matters worse, the path forward to a more stable, lucrative career is seemingly up in the air. High school grads in their twenties find jobs at nearly the same rate as those with four-year degrees.

We have two options: blame or build. The first involves blaming AI, as if this new technology is entirely to blame for the current economic malaise facing Gen Z. This course of action involves slowing or even stopping AI adoption. For example, there’s so-called robot taxes. The thinking goes that by placing financial penalties on firms that lean into AI, there will be more roles left to Gen Z and workers in general. Then there’s the idea of banning or limiting the use of AI in hiring and firing decisions. Applicants who have struggled to find work suggest that increased use of AI may be partially at fault. Others have called for providing workers with a greater say in whether and to what extent their firm uses AI. This may help firms find ways to integrate AI in a way that augments workers rather than replace them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Our Doomsday Machine

Two sides stand rigidly opposed, divided by a chasm of hardened positions and non-relationship.

AI generated illustration

Our Doomsday Machine

Political polarization is only one symptom of the national disease that afflicts us. From obesity to heart disease to chronic stress, we live with the consequences of the failure to relate to each other authentically, even to perceive and understand what an authentic encounter might be. Can we see the organic causes of the physiological ailments as arising from a single organ system – the organ of relationship?

Without actual evidence of a relationship between the physiological ailments and the failure of personal encounter, this writer (myself in 2012) is lunging, like a fencer with his sword, to puncture a delusion. He wants to interrupt a conversation running in the background like an almost-silent electric motor, asking us to notice the hum, to question it. He wants to open to our inspection the matter of what it is to credit evidence. For believing—especially with the coming of artificial intelligence, which can manufacture apparently flawless pictures of the real, and with the seething of the mob crying havoc online and then out in the streets—even believing in evidence may not ground us in truth.

Keep ReadingShow less