Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Four takeaways from Biden’s experiment with fundraiser transparency

Four takeaways from Biden’s experiment with fundraiser transparency
Spencer Platt / Getty Staff

Reacting to criticism about the wave of big-money donors who have fueled his campaign, Joe Biden is allowing reporters into his fundraisers.

The former vice president's effort at transparency is designed to mollify Democratic voters worried about the pernicious effects that millionaires' cash can have on campaigns. And it creates some contrast with most of his presidential rivals, who are doing most of their fundraising from behind a curtain – by focusing on fundraising online and in smaller amounts not subject to disclosure.

The see-through nature of Biden's money machine is not comprehensive: Cameras are not allowed to film inside the mansions where the big donors mingle, some of the schmoozing is kept off limits, and it's "pool coverage" only, meaning a single reporter gets inside to take notes of the speeches and the atmospherics and that reporting is then shared for the rest of the press corps to use.


Still, those pool reports do peel back the curtain a bit on what goes on inside exclusive gatherings where donors pay thousands of dollars to get up close and personal with a top-tier national candidate. Four things that have become clear from the first handful of Biden events where the doors have been cracked ajar:

  1. The price may be steep, but at least the food is good. At the Los Angeles home of media executive Joe Waz and Cynthia Telles, who serves on boards affiliated with Kaiser Permanente, attendees were treated to ahi tuna ceviche and avocado, langoustine tail, and caviar.
  2. Just because the events are behind closed doors does not mean the public can't be heard. At the Telles-Waz event, about a dozen protesters from the union representing Kaiser's mental health clinicians could be heard chanting: "Kaiser, Kaiser, you can't hide: We can see your greedy side."
  3. The events don't lack for irony. In a swanky private room at the NoMad casino in Las Vegas, the hosts were MGM chief executive Jim Murren and his wife, Heather, an investor and former Wall Street analyst. Before introducing Biden, she lamented that "capitalism has been morphed into a system that concentrates wealth." At a breakfast gathering at an exclusive downtown Los Angeles social club, Biden lamented the Trump tax cut, widely seen as favoring the wealthy. "This God-awful tax cut – even though it may have benefited some of you – the God awful tax cut has not helped anybody who's real, anybody out there breaking their neck trying to figure out how to make the next meal."
  4. Joe is still Joe, no matter where he is. For the most part, Biden gave these high-dollar donors a version of the same stump speech he is giving to the huddled masses. And of course, he had to throw in references to the wisdom imparted by his grandfather: "Joey, keep the faith." And his grandmother: "No, Joey: Spread it. Go spread the faith."

Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less