Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Gen Z is pissed. And our first vote is finally here.

Generation Z protest
jacoblund/Getty Images

Morris is a junior majoring in political communication at George Washington University. She has interned on Capitol Hill and in her congressional district office in Myrtle Beach, S.C.


At 20 years old, I'm one of the 24 million members of Generation Z casting a presidential vote for the first time this year — and it feels important to say that my generation is pissed.

Our ire is not just at President Trump, or because our elections now feel like a three-ring circus. We're mad because, at some point, older generations lost the script about what government is meant to do, and we're the ones who will suffer most.

Since we were kids, our country's been at constant war. Our society maintains massive and growing inequalities, particularly affecting poor and minority communities. Now, a health emergency is killing a quarter million of us while climate disasters ruin lives and livelihoods on both coasts.

If a government's job is to reach consensus to solve problems, then ours is as good as broken. My generation has seen nothing from our political leaders beyond the scuttling of compromise for petty brinkmanship and the omitting of nuance to "win a narrative" — never to advance legislation that helps those hurting the most.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In school we learned that our problems are not simple, the way the politicians couch them. They're systemic, interwoven with and directly impacted by other issues usually treated as unrelated. An embrace of context and nuance, and a clear view of the "other side," are all necessary to fix what ails the county. So-called leaders who refuse to learn this lesson are perpetuating our country's biggest problems and are not the ones we want in office.

We now have the opportunity to vote and to animate those sentiments and push for the prosperous future we deserve, which Washington will not and cannot guarantee us.

I'm from South Carolina, where hurricanes aren't just random events; they're an entire season. This year is my 20th hurricane season, and I've finally heard my father worry out loud that our house could be impacted — even destroyed — by stronger storms and rising sea levels. South Carolina is represented in the Senate by Lindsey Graham, a Republican in a tough race for re-election on Tuesday — and who's supported a president who disparages climate science, even as each year is my state's worst hurricane year ever.

It's not only Republicans. For decades the Democrats have moved away from supporting the working class and toward a cozy relationship with the Wall Street corporate class that lobbies against environmental regulations while funding campaigns. A top donor to Barack Obama's two presidential campaigns was Goldman Sachs, a name almost synonymous with corporate malfeasance and a bellwether for how other firms distribute mountains of cash.

Climate change is the ultimate systemic issue — a fact lost on Trump and his surrogates, whose policy has only helped environmentally irresponsible corporations instead of families like mine. More than anything, it is the context by which our leaders have most distorted their role and violated their oath to protect citizens.

Climate change is not just about homes washing away. My generation is fully versed in how a warming climate exacerbates the issue of race, which also seems completely lost on our representatives. Climate scientists have long deduced that Southern coastal communities with large Black populations — usually adorned with more pavement and fewer trees and foliage than white neighborhoods — are at the greatest risk of sea level rise and storm surge.

My generation does not see these as abstract problems or unfortunate accidents we need to live with. I'm part of our country's most diverse generation, and the killing of George Floyd — plus countless other people of color by police — has exploded our desire for more tangible efforts toward racial justice, an attitude we're taking with us straight to the voting booth.

It was obvious to us that once the coronavirus pandemic hit, it would intertwine itself with the issues of race and climate, and we were right. Covid-19 hurts our most beleaguered communities the most. The president sidestepped a federal response for letting state governors respond individually to a virus that doesn't acknowledge state lines — a heartbreaking lack of judgement that others could not or would not do anything about.

Epidemiology is now a partisan flashpoint. ICUs are overflowing again. We're a laughingstock internationally, and many more Americans should expect to die by next year.

My generation is cursed to live with the fallout of this political inaction for decades, but we can stem the bleeding. This election is not just about Trump and Joe Biden. It's about animating large-scale reform to the system that allowed irresponsible representatives into office in the first place. It's about finally forcing efforts to address issues that have long been ignored.

The pandemic has robbed my friends and me of our college experience. It's for that reason and so much more that our country's historically low young voter turnout is likely to reverse and break all records this week. If seasoned adults won't improve our systems and our standing in the world, Gen Z is committed to doing it ourselves.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less