Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Young people aren’t the problem with civic participation. We’re the solution.

Opinion

Young people aren’t the problem with civic participation. We’re the solution.

"Young people care about the future of this country and we're getting involved," writes Brooke Wells.

Jay LaPrete/Getty Images

Wells is an Ohio State University graduate who recently completed her time as an AmeriCorps volunteer in Hamilton, Ohio. She is now a city employee.

Recent research paints a bleak picture of young people's participation in civil service.

Just 7 percent of federal government employees are younger than 30 — even though, according to some estimates, millennials will soon make up three-quarters of the country's workforce. The statistics go on: The median age of government employees is three years higher than that of the United States as a whole. More federal tech workers are over 60 than under 35. A growing number of universities report that their public administration students are choosing private-sector jobs.

And beneath all the data is a pervasive sense that trust in public officials is at an all-time low. According to the Pew Research Center, less than 20 percent of millennials trust the government "always or most of the time." Millennials also feel less connected to any one political party: 44 percent of millennials say they are independents, compared to 39 percent of Generation X and 32 percent of baby boomers.

But these sobering statistics belie a trend that is beginning to emerge in cities and towns across America: Young people care about the future of this country and we're getting involved. Here are three proof points that the tide is turning for young people's civic participation.


In 2018, for the first time in history, 100 million Americans voted in a midterm election. This was fueled, in large part, by a surge in millennial participation — up to 42 percent, which is nearly double the participation rate from four years earlier. And Generation Z, which is just becoming eligible to vote, is turning out at higher rates than other first-time voting generations. In 2018, 30 percent of voting-age Gen Z-ers went to the polls, compared with just 23 percent of Gen X-ers in their first midterm election. The evidence suggests that young Americans aren't just becoming the country's biggest generation — we're also becoming the most involved.

Look closely at many of those stats about government participation, and you'll see something in common: Most refer to the federal government. What those stats don't tell you is that, by some estimates, we're on the brink of a sea change in local government participation. Cities from Stockton, Calif., to Ithaca, N.Y., have millennial mayors. And it's not just about running for office. Organizations like Cities of Service and AmeriCorps are encouraging young people to get involved in city hall. And we've learned that unlike the partisan bickering that dominates the federal conversation, working in local government is much more about working together and getting things done.

When I graduated from Ohio State, I felt uncertain about my academic and professional strengths. I knew I was passionate about helping others, but I wasn't sure in what capacity or where I fit in as I entered the workforce. I was lucky to discover the Cities of Service Love Your Block program, which sends AmeriCorps volunteers into communities facing poverty to support the efforts of citizen groups and local nonprofits to fight neighborhood blight. I was assigned to my own hometown of Hamilton, Ohio.

I had never imagined myself working in city government. But during my year of service, I have come to appreciate the positive, tangible impact that local initiatives and policies can have on my hometown. This spring, we hosted large-scale cleanups in two neighborhoods, which brought together dozens of community members to clean more than 35,000 square feet of public space and remove 10,000 pounds of trash and debris. The project isn't just about cleanup in the short term, either — we're working to help these communities build resilience for future challenges. When citizens and city representatives work together, as often happens at a municipal level, community members realize how responsive government can be to their needs.

According to the World Economic Forum's most recent Global Shapers Survey, inequality is one of the issues that young people worldwide care about the most. And a growing body of evidence suggests that local government has a major role to play in tackling these issues. When you see millennials in government, you'll see us working to address the challenges that we care about the most — like proactively preparing for the impact of climate change, or combating blight in low-income neighborhoods.

Young people across the country are hearing the wake-up call to run for office, participate in civil service and fight for the issues they believe in. We've learned that the fight starts right here in local government. And we encourage our peers to take up the mantle and work to make a difference in their own communities. It may start small, but the impact will be felt around the world.


Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less