Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Young people aren’t the problem with civic participation. We’re the solution.

Opinion

Young people aren’t the problem with civic participation. We’re the solution.

"Young people care about the future of this country and we're getting involved," writes Brooke Wells.

Jay LaPrete/Getty Images

Wells is an Ohio State University graduate who recently completed her time as an AmeriCorps volunteer in Hamilton, Ohio. She is now a city employee.

Recent research paints a bleak picture of young people's participation in civil service.

Just 7 percent of federal government employees are younger than 30 — even though, according to some estimates, millennials will soon make up three-quarters of the country's workforce. The statistics go on: The median age of government employees is three years higher than that of the United States as a whole. More federal tech workers are over 60 than under 35. A growing number of universities report that their public administration students are choosing private-sector jobs.

And beneath all the data is a pervasive sense that trust in public officials is at an all-time low. According to the Pew Research Center, less than 20 percent of millennials trust the government "always or most of the time." Millennials also feel less connected to any one political party: 44 percent of millennials say they are independents, compared to 39 percent of Generation X and 32 percent of baby boomers.

But these sobering statistics belie a trend that is beginning to emerge in cities and towns across America: Young people care about the future of this country and we're getting involved. Here are three proof points that the tide is turning for young people's civic participation.


In 2018, for the first time in history, 100 million Americans voted in a midterm election. This was fueled, in large part, by a surge in millennial participation — up to 42 percent, which is nearly double the participation rate from four years earlier. And Generation Z, which is just becoming eligible to vote, is turning out at higher rates than other first-time voting generations. In 2018, 30 percent of voting-age Gen Z-ers went to the polls, compared with just 23 percent of Gen X-ers in their first midterm election. The evidence suggests that young Americans aren't just becoming the country's biggest generation — we're also becoming the most involved.

Look closely at many of those stats about government participation, and you'll see something in common: Most refer to the federal government. What those stats don't tell you is that, by some estimates, we're on the brink of a sea change in local government participation. Cities from Stockton, Calif., to Ithaca, N.Y., have millennial mayors. And it's not just about running for office. Organizations like Cities of Service and AmeriCorps are encouraging young people to get involved in city hall. And we've learned that unlike the partisan bickering that dominates the federal conversation, working in local government is much more about working together and getting things done.

When I graduated from Ohio State, I felt uncertain about my academic and professional strengths. I knew I was passionate about helping others, but I wasn't sure in what capacity or where I fit in as I entered the workforce. I was lucky to discover the Cities of Service Love Your Block program, which sends AmeriCorps volunteers into communities facing poverty to support the efforts of citizen groups and local nonprofits to fight neighborhood blight. I was assigned to my own hometown of Hamilton, Ohio.

I had never imagined myself working in city government. But during my year of service, I have come to appreciate the positive, tangible impact that local initiatives and policies can have on my hometown. This spring, we hosted large-scale cleanups in two neighborhoods, which brought together dozens of community members to clean more than 35,000 square feet of public space and remove 10,000 pounds of trash and debris. The project isn't just about cleanup in the short term, either — we're working to help these communities build resilience for future challenges. When citizens and city representatives work together, as often happens at a municipal level, community members realize how responsive government can be to their needs.

According to the World Economic Forum's most recent Global Shapers Survey, inequality is one of the issues that young people worldwide care about the most. And a growing body of evidence suggests that local government has a major role to play in tackling these issues. When you see millennials in government, you'll see us working to address the challenges that we care about the most — like proactively preparing for the impact of climate change, or combating blight in low-income neighborhoods.

Young people across the country are hearing the wake-up call to run for office, participate in civil service and fight for the issues they believe in. We've learned that the fight starts right here in local government. And we encourage our peers to take up the mantle and work to make a difference in their own communities. It may start small, but the impact will be felt around the world.

Read More

Mandatory vs. Voluntary Inclusionary Housing: What Cities Are Doing to Create Affordable Homes

affordable housing

Dougal Waters/Getty Images

Mandatory vs. Voluntary Inclusionary Housing: What Cities Are Doing to Create Affordable Homes

As housing costs rise across United States cities, local governments are adopting inclusionary housing policies to ensure that some portion of new residential developments remains affordable. These policies—defined and tracked by organizations like the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy—require or encourage developers to include below-market-rate units in otherwise market-rate projects. Today, over 1,000 towns have implemented some form of inclusionary housing, often in response to mounting pressure to prevent displacement and address racial and economic inequality.

What’s the Difference Between Mandatory and Voluntary Approaches?

Inclusionary housing programs generally fall into two types:

Keep ReadingShow less
Rebuilding Democracy in the Age of Brain Rot
person using laptop computer
Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash

Rebuilding Democracy in the Age of Brain Rot

We live in a time when anyone with a cellphone carries a computer more powerful than those that sent humans to the moon and back. Yet few of us can sustain a thought beyond a few seconds. One study suggested that the average human attention span dropped from about 12 seconds in 2000 to roughly 8 seconds by 2015—although the accuracy of this figure has been disputed (Microsoft Canada, 2015 Attention Spans Report). Whatever the number, the trend is clear: our ability to focus is not what it used to be.

This contradiction—constant access to unlimited information paired with a decline in critical thinking—perfectly illustrates what Oxford named its 2024 Word of the Year: “brain rot.” More than a funny meme, it represents a genuine threat to democracy. The ability to deeply engage with issues, weigh rival arguments, and participate in collective decision-making is key to a healthy democratic society. When our capacity for focus erodes due to overstimulation, distraction, or manufactured outrage, it weakens our ability to exercise our role as citizens.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump's Clemency for Giuliani et al is Another Effort to Whitewash History and Damage Democracy

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, September 11, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Trump's Clemency for Giuliani et al is Another Effort to Whitewash History and Damage Democracy

In the earliest days of the Republic, Alexander Hamilton defended giving the president the exclusive authority to grant pardons and reprieves against the charge that doing so would concentrate too much power in one person’s hands. Reading the news of President Trump’s latest use of that authority to reward his motley crew of election deniers and misfit lawyers, I was taken back to what Hamilton wrote in 1788.

He argued that “The principal argument for reposing the power of pardoning in this case to the Chief Magistrate is this: in seasons of insurrection or rebellion, there are often critical moments, when a well- timed offer of pardon to the insurgents or rebels may restore the tranquility of the commonwealth; and which, if suffered to pass unimproved, it may never be possible afterwards to recall.”

Keep ReadingShow less
What the Success Academy Scandal Says About the Charter School Model

Empty classroom with U.S. flag

phi1/Getty Images

What the Success Academy Scandal Says About the Charter School Model

When I was running a school, I knew that every hour of my team’s day mattered. A well-prepared lesson, a timely phone call home to a parent, or a few extra minutes spent helping a struggling student were the kinds of investments that added up to better outcomes for kids.

That is why the leaked recording of Success Academy CEO Eva Moskowitz pressuring staff to lobby elected officials hit me so hard. In an audio first reported by Gothamist, she tells employees, “Every single one of you must make calls,” assigning quotas to contact lawmakers. On September 18th, the network of 59 schools canceled classes for its roughly 22,000 students to bring them to a political rally during the school day. What should have been time for teaching and learning became a political operation.

Keep ReadingShow less