Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Let's support democracy by joining community organizations

Opinion

garden club

Joining a garden club can help democracy, writes McLeod.

Alejandra Villa Loarca/Newsday RM via Getty Images

McLeod was the first executive director of Foothills Forum.

What has gone so distressingly wrong with our self-government? Are we so angry, mistrusting and tribalized that we must now recoil from meaningful social debate and lurch fearfully from one polarizing fight to the next?

The causes of our crisis are complex and intertwined. Francis Fukuyama bemoans the rise of extremism on both the left and the right. Rachel Kleinfeld cites the dehumanization of adversaries. Jonathan Rauch is alarmed about the decline of democratic institutions that we assume, wrongly, are self-sustaining. Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt argue that constitutional reform is necessary to overcome provisions that empower partisan minorities and thwart the will of popular majorities.


Quite a few years ago, when I received a master’s degree from the Harvard Kennedy School, I was privileged to benefit from the scholarship and wisdom of then Dean Robert Putnam. And today, many years later, Putnam’s work has come to my attention with his new book, “ Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Communit y." In the book, which has gained wide notoriety, Putman advocates for actively creating social fiber by joining the local PTA, garden club, neighborhood association, church, Rotary or, yes, bowling group.

Putnam sees in all these areas a severe loss of essential “social capital” – knowing people with whom we may differ in background and thinking, but trusting them and building community with them. Social capital is the connective tissue that undergirds the places we live and enables healthy, democratic processes in our highly diverse society.

Now, in a compelling new documentary – “Join or Die”– Putnam argues that the communal decline he documented is central to the demise of American democracy. His messages of human connection and healthy, disparate communities are extremely timely – and, in fact, timeless.

"There are two different kinds of consequences of our social connections, or of the absence of social connections,” he says.

“One set has to do with how being a loner affects us personally. The title of the film 'Join or Die' refers to that set of consequences, because it's quite clear. And I made this [point] originally in 'Bowling Alone' while I was writing it 25 years ago. But it's now become even clearer. Your chances of dying over the next year are cut in half by joining one group, cut in three quarters by joining two groups. In other words, there are major physical and many other effects on you personally, if you become isolated."

"I also felt in the news, we were doing a lot of stories about 'this is bad, this is bad,' but not nearly enough about what we can do and where we can look for hope."

The decline in social capital has been exacerbated by life online and the pandemic, no doubt, and the title “Join or Die” may seem a bit alarming to some. But this film's salience and urgency cannot be understated.

We all need to find people, create social connections and strengthen society. In turn, we and our democracy can survive and thrive.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less