Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Faith-based communities have a role to play in strengthening democracy

Faith-based communities have a role to play in strengthening democracy
Getty Images

Sofi Hersher Andorsky is Vice President for Strategy and Communications of A More Perfect Union: The Jewish Partnership for Democracy, an effort to mobilize the American Jewish community to protect and strengthen American democracy.

There is an old joke about making decisions in the Jewish community: three people, 10 opinions. And that is how it is inside houses of worship, schools, and faith institutions across America, as they routinely meld the diverse opinions as they do the work of negotiating, compromising, forging consensus, and fostering a sense of purpose. The same is true of other faith-based spaces; connected by a shared identity and a commitment to a shared future, diverse people make meaning, celebrate, plan, and make decisions together. The outcomes don’t always satisfy everyone, but a commitment to the overall vision – and to each other – keeps the community together.


Indeed, at a time when democratic norms and institutions in the United States are under attack, and amidst a rise in extremism that has fueled violence against minority faith communities nationwide, the faith-based community has often shown how regular community engagement can sustain civic connections, connections that grow stronger in times of crisis. With American democracy in a state of fragility, the experience of faith-based communities make them essential leaders in the work of strengthening democratic culture in this country.

At A More Perfect Union, we sought to test this proposition. In 2022, we launched the Jewish Partnership for Democracy, a cross-ideological, cross-sector network of Jewish organizations working together toward a stronger, more democratic future. We work with Jewish institutions of all types and sizes to channel our community’s distinct capacities into concrete actions that support democracy. We help our partners assess their existing assets – trust, infrastructure, engaged members, personal networks, staff expertise, capacity to compromise and a long-established commitment to education and civic engagement – and bring them to bear in new ways.

We’ve structured our efforts around four strategic priorities that are designed to be mutually-reinforcing and nonpartisan: expanding opportunities for civic learning; cultivating the practice of democracy; promoting ideological pluralism; and ensuring free, fair, safe and accessible elections. Within these priorities, we encourage partners to design specific commitments that engage their community in the most meaningful and appropriate way for them – and we provide support, technical assistance, education, and access to resources, including funding.

Our work is inclusive, action-oriented, and pro-democracy. It does not support any particular party or policy agenda. Instead, it recognizes that a healthy liberal democracy is an essential precondition for the pursuit of policies that matter to communities. We can work together to ensure a vibrant democracy while advocating – sometimes in opposition to one another – for different policy outcomes based on our distinctive values. Like democracy itself, our approach envisions a shared future and supports a framework for civic action, but empowers individual communities to engage in the ways that are most meaningful, effective, and realistic for them.

We’ve seen from new and existing efforts how this approach can bear fruit. From initiatives that develop journalism programs at Jewish parochial schools, to synagogue study groups that analyze American historical documents, to convenings for “democracy dinners” during Shabbat (Judaism's day of rest from Friday to Saturday evening of each week), Jewish organizations across the country have taken impressive steps to strengthen democratic culture within our community. Yet often, these initiatives are operating in isolation – without the support and amplification they deserve or the opportunity to share what they've learned with peers who would be eager to replicate or adapt it.

At A More Perfect Union, we’re working to elevate and share these actions, promoting opportunities for engagement and building a sense of common purpose. We see ourselves as “connective tissue,” ready to learn from our partners and help connect Jewish institutions to great organizations around the country that are providing expertise, programs, civic learning curricula, volunteer opportunities, depolarization support, gathering spaces, and other ways to protect and strengthen American democracy. In fact, we’re building a database of partners doing democracy-related work – and if that sounds like you, we invite you to get in touch.

Of course, while our collective impact model is focused on the Jewish community, it is equally applicable to other faith- or identity-based populations. The Faith In/And Democracy initiative at PACE (Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement), the One America Movement, and Aspen’s Religion & Society Program, and Civic Spirit have already done important work to bring together faith groups for democracy, but more is possible.

We’re confident that this model is adaptable to other communities across the country. We’re eager to learn from others across the pro-democracy ecosystem and to amplify and extend the norms and principles that faith communities already employ in order to achieve a more resounding impact on our democracy. Whether as conveners of a collective impact organization or as one of its partners, faith-based institutions and associations have the ability to elevate their civic efforts and fortify our shared future.

The work that faith communities already do – to educate, compromise, forge consensus, and move forward – is central to the functioning of American democracy. With their help and their leadership, we can elevate our national community and build a stronger democracy together.


Read More

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr., Clarence Mitchell Jr., Patricia Roberts Harris, and other guests at the signing of the Voting Rights Act on August 6, 1965.

Yoichi Okamoto - Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

In 2002, U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, a Republican, nearly lost his South Texas seat to Democrat Henry Cuellar. So when the GOP used its newfound majority in the state Legislature to redraw the voting maps the next year, they sawed through Cuellar’s hometown of Laredo and scattered Latino voters, who tended to vote Democratic, into other districts.

Latino advocacy groups sued under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the cornerstone provision of the law that prevents government bodies from diluting the voting power of specific groups. The Supreme Court found Texas lawmakers had taken away Latino voting power “because they were about to exercise it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Audience members listen as U.S. President Donald Trump.

Audience members listen as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Coosa Steel Corporation on February 19, 2026 in Rome, Georgia.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Heil Trump!

Stop. I am not implying that Trump is the equivalent of Hitler. As I have said in two previous posts suggesting an analogy between Hitler and Trump, while Trump has an evil streak, he is not even close to being as evil as Hitler (see "The Hitler-Trump Analogy" and "Another Hitler-Trump Analogy"). However, Trump has characteristics, and his supporters have characteristics, in common with Hitler and his followers.

Trump is a megalomaniac; his self-aggrandizement knows no bounds. See my article, "Trump - Poster Child of a Megalomaniac." Trump clearly thinks of himself as a man who can do no wrong, the brightest person in the world, a king, a master of the universe. There are no rules that apply to him. As he said in a New York Times interview, "My own morality, my own mind. It's the only thing that can stop me."

Keep ReadingShow less
Oregon Pioneered Vote-by-Mail. Its Ballot Access Laws Are Still in the Covered Wagon Era.
white printer paper on white table

Oregon Pioneered Vote-by-Mail. Its Ballot Access Laws Are Still in the Covered Wagon Era.

Oregon's primary election was on May 19. Neither of the two major-party candidates in Oregon's 6th Congressional District faced a primary opponent. They'll automatically advance to November's general election ballot, without a single voter really needing to weigh in, without collecting a single petition signature, and without knocking on a single door. The Democratic incumbent represents a party that accounts for 29.75 percent of registered voters in this district. The Republican nominee represents a party with 24.78 percent of the vote. Together, the two parties represent a minority of OR-6's electorate, and both of their candidates are already on the November ballot.

I represent the largest voting bloc in this district. Nearly 40 percent of OR-6's registered voters are unaffiliated, more than either party. These voters have never had a candidate who answers only to them—not to party bosses, party lines, or special interests. I am trying to be that candidate. And I am still on the porch, clipboard in hand, collecting the 5,500 hand-signed paper petitions I will need just to guarantee that my name appears beside theirs in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Wind farm construction.

Wind farm construction means jobs and locally produced power.

Why Trump’s $2 Billion Buyoff To Cancel Offshore Wind Farms Is a Bad Deal for American Taxpayers and the US Energy Supply

The U.S. is in a bizarre situation in 2026: It’s facing a looming energy shortage, yet the Trump administration is making deals to pay offshore wind developers nearly US$2 billion in taxpayer money to walk away from energy projects.

These politically motivated moves are costing Americans far more than just the buyouts.

Keep ReadingShow less