Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Faith-based communities have a role to play in strengthening democracy

Faith-based communities have a role to play in strengthening democracy
Getty Images

Sofi Hersher Andorsky is Vice President for Strategy and Communications of A More Perfect Union: The Jewish Partnership for Democracy, an effort to mobilize the American Jewish community to protect and strengthen American democracy.

There is an old joke about making decisions in the Jewish community: three people, 10 opinions. And that is how it is inside houses of worship, schools, and faith institutions across America, as they routinely meld the diverse opinions as they do the work of negotiating, compromising, forging consensus, and fostering a sense of purpose. The same is true of other faith-based spaces; connected by a shared identity and a commitment to a shared future, diverse people make meaning, celebrate, plan, and make decisions together. The outcomes don’t always satisfy everyone, but a commitment to the overall vision – and to each other – keeps the community together.


Indeed, at a time when democratic norms and institutions in the United States are under attack, and amidst a rise in extremism that has fueled violence against minority faith communities nationwide, the faith-based community has often shown how regular community engagement can sustain civic connections, connections that grow stronger in times of crisis. With American democracy in a state of fragility, the experience of faith-based communities make them essential leaders in the work of strengthening democratic culture in this country.

At A More Perfect Union, we sought to test this proposition. In 2022, we launched the Jewish Partnership for Democracy, a cross-ideological, cross-sector network of Jewish organizations working together toward a stronger, more democratic future. We work with Jewish institutions of all types and sizes to channel our community’s distinct capacities into concrete actions that support democracy. We help our partners assess their existing assets – trust, infrastructure, engaged members, personal networks, staff expertise, capacity to compromise and a long-established commitment to education and civic engagement – and bring them to bear in new ways.

We’ve structured our efforts around four strategic priorities that are designed to be mutually-reinforcing and nonpartisan: expanding opportunities for civic learning; cultivating the practice of democracy; promoting ideological pluralism; and ensuring free, fair, safe and accessible elections. Within these priorities, we encourage partners to design specific commitments that engage their community in the most meaningful and appropriate way for them – and we provide support, technical assistance, education, and access to resources, including funding.

Our work is inclusive, action-oriented, and pro-democracy. It does not support any particular party or policy agenda. Instead, it recognizes that a healthy liberal democracy is an essential precondition for the pursuit of policies that matter to communities. We can work together to ensure a vibrant democracy while advocating – sometimes in opposition to one another – for different policy outcomes based on our distinctive values. Like democracy itself, our approach envisions a shared future and supports a framework for civic action, but empowers individual communities to engage in the ways that are most meaningful, effective, and realistic for them.

We’ve seen from new and existing efforts how this approach can bear fruit. From initiatives that develop journalism programs at Jewish parochial schools, to synagogue study groups that analyze American historical documents, to convenings for “democracy dinners” during Shabbat (Judaism's day of rest from Friday to Saturday evening of each week), Jewish organizations across the country have taken impressive steps to strengthen democratic culture within our community. Yet often, these initiatives are operating in isolation – without the support and amplification they deserve or the opportunity to share what they've learned with peers who would be eager to replicate or adapt it.

At A More Perfect Union, we’re working to elevate and share these actions, promoting opportunities for engagement and building a sense of common purpose. We see ourselves as “connective tissue,” ready to learn from our partners and help connect Jewish institutions to great organizations around the country that are providing expertise, programs, civic learning curricula, volunteer opportunities, depolarization support, gathering spaces, and other ways to protect and strengthen American democracy. In fact, we’re building a database of partners doing democracy-related work – and if that sounds like you, we invite you to get in touch.

Of course, while our collective impact model is focused on the Jewish community, it is equally applicable to other faith- or identity-based populations. The Faith In/And Democracy initiative at PACE (Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement), the One America Movement, and Aspen’s Religion & Society Program, and Civic Spirit have already done important work to bring together faith groups for democracy, but more is possible.

We’re confident that this model is adaptable to other communities across the country. We’re eager to learn from others across the pro-democracy ecosystem and to amplify and extend the norms and principles that faith communities already employ in order to achieve a more resounding impact on our democracy. Whether as conveners of a collective impact organization or as one of its partners, faith-based institutions and associations have the ability to elevate their civic efforts and fortify our shared future.

The work that faith communities already do – to educate, compromise, forge consensus, and move forward – is central to the functioning of American democracy. With their help and their leadership, we can elevate our national community and build a stronger democracy together.

Read More

​DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly.

DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly speaks to the gathering at an adoption ceremony in Torrington.

Laura Tillman / CT Mirror

What’s Behind the Smiles on National Adoption Day

In the past 21 years, I’ve fostered and adopted children with complex medical and developmental needs. Last year, after a grueling 2,205 days navigating the DCF system, we adopted our 7yo daughter. This year, we were the last family on the docket for National Adoption Day after 589 days of suspense. While my 2 yo daughter’s adoption was a moment of triumph, the cold, empty courtroom symbolized the system’s detachment from the lived experiences of marginalized families.

National Adoption Day often serves as a time to highlight stories of joy and family unification. Yet, behind the scenes, the obstacles faced by children in foster care and the families that support them tell a more complex story—one that demands attention and action. For those of us who have navigated the foster care system as caregivers, the systemic indifference and disparities experienced by marginalized children and families, particularly within BIPOC and disability communities, remain glaringly unresolved.

Keep ReadingShow less
Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep ReadingShow less