Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Religion can strengthen our democracy

Opinion

"COEXIST" charms
Julian Kumar/Godong/Getty Images

Beaumont is an independent wisdom researcher who is developing the Applied Wisdom curriculum on Wikiversity.

We live in deeply divided times when extreme views often challenge our First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and separation of church and state. Extremism also promotes social, cultural and political polarization that separates us further as a people.

Not only is our nation dangerously divided, but we live in a dangerously divided world. Religious conflicts, wars, nationalism, class struggles, racial tensions, culture wars, ideological conflicts, social inequality, political polarization, book banning, hate crimes, climate change denial and conspiracy theories are a few examples of the conflicts that are dividing people throughout the world.

Could part of the solution be finding common ground through religion?


Traditional religions have been wildly successful throughout history. Today more than 80 percent of the world’s people identify as religious. Religious beliefs provided tribal people a sense of community, moral guidance, awesome experiences, answers to existential questions, hope and peace of mind through prayer, exploration of the virtues, comfort, tenderness, atonement, and other avenues for spiritual growth and community harmony.

Unfortunately, today many people are disappointed by theocratic bureaucracies that perpetuate inconsistencies and falsehoods that are based on outdated doctrine and dogma. More and more religious people are choosing non-denominational faiths and leaving traditional religions because they can find the community, moral guidance, comfort, and a sense of awe that traditional churches do not provide. Many are seeking religion that is rationally constructed and provides the benefits of traditional religions, while providing a fertile common ground for on-going learning and increased well-being. Real good religion can seek a higher good and allow curiosity and clear thinking to free ourselves from dogma. It can unleash our curiosity and help us adopt an inquisitive stance toward the various supernatural claims made by traditional religions.

Religion can embrace beliefs that are not based on wielding power, winning an argument, or adhering to an ideology, social conformity, respect for authority, loyalty, pride, comfort, or ambivalence. Modern religion will thrive if it is predicated on developing a well-founded moral reasoning, cherishing awe, gathering in communities and practicing real good versions of traditional prayers.

This does not mean we do not learn from and build upon traditional religion. Certainly we can learn from the universal teachings of traditional religions to appreciate human virtues, explore transcendent possibilities, enjoy symbols and rituals, and marvel at religious experiences. But we can expand our horizons and practice a faith that allows us to explore existential questions. We can gain comfort as we seek tenderness, atone for our wrongdoings, find real hope, continue spiritual growth and discover our true selves. We can do good as we help others through philanthropy and volunteer work.

Common ground in the form of a real good religion can help us come together and build a bright future for everyone. We can leave behind the anachronisms, inconsistencies, divisiveness, and polarization sometimes seen in religions and advance toward living a truly good life. We can enjoy

living wisely together. We can come together.

Read More

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

When Hegseth ordered all top brass to assemble in Quantico in September, he declared women could either meet male standards for combat roles or get cut. Strong message, except the military was already doing that, so Hegseth was either oblivious or ignoring decades of history. Confusion aside, it reaffirmed a goal Hegseth has made clear since his Fox News days, when he said, “I'm straight up saying we should not have women in combat roles.” Now, as of January 6th, the Pentagon is planning a six-month review of women in ground combat jobs. It may come as no surprise, but this thinly veiled anti-woman agenda has no tactical security advantage.

When integrating women into combat roles was brought to Congress in 1993, a summary of findings submitted that, “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect . . . women.” Archaic notions of the patriarchy almost outweighed logic; instead, luckily, as combat roles have become available to them, more and more women are now serving, increasing military readiness. As it turns out, women are highly effective in combat. Khris Fuhr, a West Point graduate who worked on gender integration at Army Forces Command, calls this new review "a solution for a problem that doesn't exist." She says an Army study between 2018 to 2023 showed women didn’t just perform well in ground combat units but sometimes scored even better than their male counterparts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women holding signs to defend diversity at Havard

Harvard students joined in a rally protesting the Supreme Courts ruling against affirmative action in 2023.

Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Diversity Has Become a Dirty Word. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

I have an identical twin sister. Although our faces can unlock each other’s iPhones, even the two of us are not exactly the same. If identical twins can differ, wouldn’t most people be different too? Why is diversity considered a bad word?

Like me, my twin sister is in computing, yet we are unique in many ways. She works in industry, while I am in academia. She’s allergic to guinea pigs, while I had pet guinea pigs (yep, that’s how she found out). Even our voices aren’t the same. As a kid, I was definitely the chattier one, while she loved taking walks together in silence (which, of course, drove me crazy).

Keep ReadingShow less
DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Team of male and female entrepreneurs working on computers at office

Getty Images

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Amid the pushback to DEI, an essential truth often gets lost: You have agency over how you approach building diversity, equity, and inclusion into your organization.

No executive order or unhinged rant can change that.

Keep ReadingShow less
White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less