Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Religion can strengthen our democracy

Opinion

"COEXIST" charms
Julian Kumar/Godong/Getty Images

Beaumont is an independent wisdom researcher who is developing the Applied Wisdom curriculum on Wikiversity.

We live in deeply divided times when extreme views often challenge our First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and separation of church and state. Extremism also promotes social, cultural and political polarization that separates us further as a people.

Not only is our nation dangerously divided, but we live in a dangerously divided world. Religious conflicts, wars, nationalism, class struggles, racial tensions, culture wars, ideological conflicts, social inequality, political polarization, book banning, hate crimes, climate change denial and conspiracy theories are a few examples of the conflicts that are dividing people throughout the world.

Could part of the solution be finding common ground through religion?


Traditional religions have been wildly successful throughout history. Today more than 80 percent of the world’s people identify as religious. Religious beliefs provided tribal people a sense of community, moral guidance, awesome experiences, answers to existential questions, hope and peace of mind through prayer, exploration of the virtues, comfort, tenderness, atonement, and other avenues for spiritual growth and community harmony.

Unfortunately, today many people are disappointed by theocratic bureaucracies that perpetuate inconsistencies and falsehoods that are based on outdated doctrine and dogma. More and more religious people are choosing non-denominational faiths and leaving traditional religions because they can find the community, moral guidance, comfort, and a sense of awe that traditional churches do not provide. Many are seeking religion that is rationally constructed and provides the benefits of traditional religions, while providing a fertile common ground for on-going learning and increased well-being. Real good religion can seek a higher good and allow curiosity and clear thinking to free ourselves from dogma. It can unleash our curiosity and help us adopt an inquisitive stance toward the various supernatural claims made by traditional religions.

Religion can embrace beliefs that are not based on wielding power, winning an argument, or adhering to an ideology, social conformity, respect for authority, loyalty, pride, comfort, or ambivalence. Modern religion will thrive if it is predicated on developing a well-founded moral reasoning, cherishing awe, gathering in communities and practicing real good versions of traditional prayers.

This does not mean we do not learn from and build upon traditional religion. Certainly we can learn from the universal teachings of traditional religions to appreciate human virtues, explore transcendent possibilities, enjoy symbols and rituals, and marvel at religious experiences. But we can expand our horizons and practice a faith that allows us to explore existential questions. We can gain comfort as we seek tenderness, atone for our wrongdoings, find real hope, continue spiritual growth and discover our true selves. We can do good as we help others through philanthropy and volunteer work.

Common ground in the form of a real good religion can help us come together and build a bright future for everyone. We can leave behind the anachronisms, inconsistencies, divisiveness, and polarization sometimes seen in religions and advance toward living a truly good life. We can enjoy

living wisely together. We can come together.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less