Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The ideal democracy: An orchestra in harmony

Blurred image of an orchestra
Melpomenem/Getty Images

Frazier is an assistant professor at the Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University. Starting this summer, he will serve as a Tarbell fellow.

In the symphony of our democracy, we can find a compelling analogy with an orchestra. The interplay of musicians trained in different instruments, each contributing to the grand musical tapestry, offers lessons for our democratic system. As we navigate the complexities of governance, let us draw inspiration from the orchestra's structure, dynamics and philosophy.


At the heart of an orchestra lies the recognition that every member brings unique strengths, skills and interests. The violinist's nimble fingers, the trumpeter's powerful breath and the percussionist's precise timing each add a distinct flavor to the collective performance. Similarly, our democracy thrives on the diversity of its citizens. Each individual, with their unique perspective and expertise, enriches the democratic process. Whether it's the seasoned politician, the passionate activist or the engaged citizen, everyone has a role to play.

Embracing this diversity not only strengthens our democracy but also ensures that a wide array of voices is heard and valued. This is precisely why we should all be concerned with the fact that young voters are far less likely than their more seasoned neighbors to head to the polls. Our democracy is currently like a symphony without the strings section — we’re missing a lot of verve.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In an orchestra, every member is given the opportunity to contribute to the whole. The clarinet's solo, the cello's harmony and the timpani's beat all weave together to create a unified sound. This principle is equally vital in a democracy. A functioning democracy provides platforms for all citizens to participate, be it through voting, community organizing or public discourse. Just as each instrument's contribution is essential to the orchestra's performance, every citizen's participation is crucial to the health of our democracy. Encouraging active engagement ensures that our democratic process remains vibrant and responsive to the needs of the people. Yet, many Americans miss opportunities to lend a hand in whichever way best aligns with their skills. Rates of volunteerism have been on the decline for more than a decade. We can and must make it easier for folks to get involved in their communities.

A good orchestra is characterized by frequent practice, mutual trust and adherence to the conductor's guidance. Musicians must trust their colleagues to play their parts with precision and commitment. Similarly, democracy requires continuous engagement, trust among citizens and respect for leadership. Elected officials must earn the trust of their constituents through transparency, accountability and effective governance. In return, citizens must actively participate and hold their leaders accountable.

Just as an orchestra depends on the conductor to lead with vision and skill, a democracy relies on leaders who can inspire and guide the collective towards common goals. This is another area for improvement. According to the Pew Research Center, just 37 percent of voters turned out for the 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections. Imagine listening to an orchestra in which 63 percent of the musicians missed one or more practices. You would likely notice some instruments out of tune and sections out of sync. The same goes for our democracy. We need citizens to take every “practice” seriously.

Finally, the best orchestras do not strictly adhere to the sheet music but find innovative ways to adapt songs to modern ears. They infuse classical pieces with contemporary interpretations, making the music relevant and engaging for today's audiences. Our democracy, too, must evolve and adapt to the changing times. This requires a willingness to innovate, to challenge outdated practices and to embrace new ideas. By fostering a culture of innovation, we can ensure that our democratic institutions remain robust and responsive in an ever-changing world.

Let us strive to build a democracy that resonates with the same beauty and complexity as a symphony. By learning from the orchestra's example, we can create a society where every voice is heard, every contribution is valued, and every individual is empowered to participate. In this way, our democracy can truly become a harmonious ensemble, working together to create a brighter and more inclusive future for all.

Read More

Suzette Brooks Masters
Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘Democracy is something we have to fight for’: A conversation with Suzette Brooks Masters

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the seventh in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

Is polarization in the United States laying the groundwork for political violence? That is not a simple question to answer.

Affective polarization — the tendency of partisans to hate those who hold opposing political views — does seem to be growing in the United States. But as a recent report from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace makes clear, “many European countries show affective polarization at about the same level as that of the United States, but their democracies are not suffering as much, suggesting that something about the US political system, media, campaigns, or social fabric is allowing Americans’ level of emotional polarization to be particularly harmful to US democracy.”

Suzette Brooks Masters is someone whose job it is to think about threats to American democracy. The leader of the Better Futures Project at the Democracy Funders Network, Masters recently spent months studying innovations in resilient democracy from around the world. The resulting report, “Imagining Better Futures for American Democracy,” argues that one way to help protect American democracy from “authoritarian disruption” is to engage in a process of “reimagining our governance model for the future.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Bible on top of an American flag
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

Project 2025: A Christo-fascist manifesto designing a theocracy

Watkins is the best selling author of the memoir "Not Without My Father: One Woman's 444-- Mile Walk of the Natchez Trace"

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Since January, I have been writing about Project 2025, the 900-plus-page policy document spearheaded by the far-right Heritage Foundation. Unlike many who cover this work from a policy perspective, I write about it as a Christo-fascist manifesto to transform our democracy into a Christian Nationalist theocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
US Capitol surrounded by digital code

Some members of Congress use social media to disparage the system they’re part of.

traffic_analyzer/Getty Images

Members of Congress undermine the country – and their own legitimacy – with antidemocratic rhetoric

Miller is a visiting assistant professor of political science at the University of Richmond.

Blame was cast far and wide after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump. Obviously, the shooter was to blame, but depending on your perspective, you also blamed Democrats, Republicans or both for the highly charged partisan rhetoric that has heated up American political life and, for at least some people, made violence seem like an option.

While the event was shocking, the underlying mood has been building for quite a while. The political times Americans are living through are increasingly described as a “crisis of democracy.” Much has been written about growing polarization, reduced public trust in small-d democratic institutions and long-standing principles of behavior often thought of as “democratic norms,” and increasing levels of public support for autocratic ideas and leaders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Biden leaving Marine One
Kent Nishimura/Getty Images

Is replacing Biden as his party’s nominee an attack on democracy? Hardly.

Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.

Alas, the coronation of Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee is complete.

Keep ReadingShow less