Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Young adults, particularly Black people, do not trust the government

people protesting

Young adults do not have faith in government or believe it represents them.

Rawpixel/Getty Images

Millennials and members of Generation Z have little faith in any level of government, and nearly half of young Black people do not feel like full citizens of the United States, according to new survey data.

Just one-quarter of adults ages 18-36 said they trust the federal government, including just 19 percent of Black people, with slightly more saying they trust state and local governments. Asian respondents said they had more trust (35 percent).

The survey – produced by the progressive think tank Next100 and GenFoward, which conducts surveys of young adults – found that 47 percent of young Black adults do not “feel like a full and equal citizen in this country with all the rights and protections that other people have.” No other racial or ethnic groups had a similar response, although one third of respondents with household incomes under $60,000 felt the same.


In addition, young Americans believe the federal and local governments do not care about them, regardless of race or income.

“We know that younger generations are the most diverse in American history. Our survey shows that, while the vast majority of young people feel disconnected from government, some groups feel more disconnected than others — namely, young Americans of color and those with lower incomes,” said Cathy Cohen, founder of GenForward. “If we are to have a government that is truly reflective of its people, it is incumbent upon our elected officials to heed the priorities and concerns of our young adults.”

Less than one-fifth of young Americans believe leaders in the federal government “come from communities like mine.” Only Asian respondents (22 percent) and those with household incomes above $60,000 (23 percent) broke the 20 percent barrier on that question, although all groups felt somewhat more aligned with local government leaders (33 percent overall).

However, 62 percent of respondents to the survey (which was conducted Nov. 5-19, 2021, of 3,279 people, oversampling for minority respondents) said they would be more likely to trust government leaders if they came from “my community.”

“What these findings underscore is that proximity to policymaking matters,” said Emma Vadehra, executive director of Next100. “Building a government and policy sector that is reflective of the people it serves will help restore the trust needed to implement lasting policies that improve lives.”

The feelings among young Black people align with a new report from the National Urban League that says the the voting rights of Black and Brown people are under attack.

“[S]ince the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, the United States has seen a steady rise in disenfranchisement practices giving one party an edge over the other. But never before has the nation seen such an insidious and coordinated campaign to obliterate the very principle of ‘one person, one vote’ from the political process,” President and CEO Marc Morial wrote in the report. “It is, in every sense of the term, a plot to destroy democracy.”

Morial provides a timeline of voter suppression tactics that started after a rise in Black turnout contributed to Barack Obama’s election in 2008 through the Supreme Court striking “ preclearance ” from the Voting Rights Act to the “Big Lie” that followed Donald Trump’s loss in 2020.

The report identifies four tactics being used against Black and Brown people: racial gerrymandering, making it harder to vote, the “Stop the Steal” movement and threats against election officials.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less