Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Accepting reality, McConnell ends long validation of Trump attacks on democracy

Accepting reality, McConnell ends long validation of Trump attacks on democracy
Sen. Mitch McConnell: "I want to congratulate President-elect Joe Biden."

The wall of Republican appeasement and enabling cracked big-time on Tuesday, when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared he was through with supporting President Trump's crusade to subvert American democracy by discrediting the election he lost.

It took 38 days after the outcome became clear for McConnell, who will be the most powerful Republican in the nation next year, to publicly accept the will of the people with the words, "Today I want to congratulate President-elect Joe Biden."

The senator said his unprecedentedly long wait — which has fueled the baseless but impassioned view of tens of millions of fellow Republicans that the contest was stolen — was ending because "the Electoral College has spoken" and finalized the result Monday evening.


"As of this morning, our country has officially a president-elect and a vice president-elect. Many millions of us had hoped the presidential election would yield a different result, but our system of government has processes to determine who will be sworn in on Jan. 20," McConnell said as the Senate convened.

McConnell had congratulated Trump a day after the 2016 election, but he had repeatedly refused when pressed to publicly acknowledge Biden's win this time.

Only hours before, the defeated incumbent continued to deny the outcome and urge leaders of his party to stick with him. "Many Trump votes were routed to Biden," the president baselessly claimed on Twitter. "This Fake Election can no longer stand. Get moving Republicans."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

And less than half an hour after the Kentucky Republican spoke, Trump tweeted: "Tremendous evidence pouring in on voter fraud. There has never been anything like this in our Country!"

McConnell's declaration may open a floodgate of public Republican acceptance of Biden's win, until now dammed up behind the extraordinary way Trump has held GOP officials in Washington and around the country in his thrall. For more than a month, only a dozen or so congressional Republicans have been willing to call Biden the next president.

No matter how baldly Trump has lied about the integrity of the election and other basic democratic norms, thereby fomenting intensifying spurts of violence from his supporters, a lopsided majority of rank-and-file Republicans have declined to call him out — unwilling to cross their base supporters or risk presidential retribution by tweet.

McConnell offered a tribute to Trump's presidency, using the past tense, before congratulating Biden — noting "he is no stranger to the Senate," where he represented Delaware for 36 years, and "has devoted himself to public service for many years." He also congratulated his Senate colleague Kamala Harris of California, saying, "Beyond our differences, all Americans can take pride that our nation has a female vice president-elect for the very first time."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — who had berated Republicans on Monday for creating a "national embarrassment" with their delayed acceptance of Biden's win — said that now that McConnell has spoken, "enough is enough."

With McConnell's move, the most influential Republican who has yet to acknowledge the reality of Biden's win is House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California.

The other top members of the Senate GOP leadership — John Cornyn of Texas, Roy Blunt of Missouri and John Thune of South Dakota — only came around to conceding that Biden had won on Monday, and all of them used somewhat convoluted rhetoric.

"In the end at some point you have to face the music," Thune said.

"Once the Electoral College settles the issue," he added, "it's time for everybody to move on."

The turnaround comes beyond the midpoint between Election Day and Inauguration Day, which is five weeks from Wednesday.

And three weeks from Wednesday the final formal act of the election will play out: the tabulating by a joint session of Congress of the 306 electoral votes for Biden and the 232 votes for Trump — with Vice President Mike Pence called on to preside.

A handful of House Republicans have vowed to challenge the votes from some battleground states Biden won, but have not yet divulged what rationale or evidence of alleged malfeasance they will offer. Their complaints will go nowhere unless one senator agrees to join them, but in the end the Democratic-majority House will have the power to squash to the shenanigans.

But the damage to the nation's faith in the electoral system will have been locked in, many historians and election officials have warned, pointing to the significant share of voters — and lopsided majorities of Republicans — who have said in poll after post-election poll that they buy Trump's unfounded claims of vote fraud.

His legal team continues to press an array of legal challenges, some in states he lost badly, hoping to throw out millions of ballots returned by mail or deposited in drop boxes. Attorney General William Barr, who abruptly resigned Monday, has said there is no evidence of cheating big enough to alter results. The same message has been delivered by both Republican and Democratic state election officials from coast to coast. And the Supreme Court has declined to even take up both of the two Trump-backed challenges that have landed on its doorstep.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less