Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

As Biden closes in, Trump's party belatedly starts siding with democracy instead

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

"Here's how this must work in our great country: Every legal vote should be counted," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell tweeted.

Jon Cherry/Getty Images

As Joe Biden arrived at the precipice of the presidency, President Trump on Friday continued to rail without evidence against the routine and methodical counting of the close contest.

And more and more fellow Republicans condemned or ignored his last-gasp campaign of lies and misinformation.

Day Four of Election Week was taking on a different tone. It suggested much of the GOP establishment was ready to unify behind sticking up for the bedrock norms of American electoral democracy, and collectively rebuffing the president's pleadings — just as soon as it became mathematically certain he had lost.


That may be as soon as sometime Friday, as the former Democratic vice president's narrow leads held fast in Georgia, Arizona and Nevada and kept growing in Pennsylvania — which by itself would put Biden past the 270 electoral votes needed to win. He planned to address the nation in the evening.

"I ask everyone to stay calm. The process is working," Biden said Thursday. "It is the will of the voters. No one, not anyone else who chooses the president."

Trump remained holed up in the White House after a middle-of-the-night tweet summarizing his fact-free view of his predicament:

"I easily WIN the Presidency of the United States with LEGAL VOTES CAST. The OBSERVERS were not allowed, in any way, shape, or form, to do their job and therefore, votes accepted during this period must be determined to be ILLEGAL VOTES. U.S. Supreme Court should decide!"

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In fact, hundreds of partisan observers from both parties have been permitted to watch the tabulating of tens of millions of valid ballots across the country, although what they can do and even where they can stand varies from state to state. Judges in Georgia and Michigan on Thursday dismissed Trump campaign lawsuits demanding more access to the counting rooms.

The Twitter burst followed another one of Trump's corrosive diatribes from a White House podium Thursday night, this one supplementing his unsupported accusations of voter fraud with false claims that he was being robbed of a second term.

"This is a case when they are trying to steal an election, they are trying to rig an election," he declared.

No sitting president has ever worked so hard to sow doubt about the essential core of the democratic process. His campaign began months ago. First, he started declaring that mail-in voting was so cursed by fraud that he could not win if it was widely permitted. Then he refused to commit to the peaceful transfer of power.

He's now following through on that rhetoric when it matters most, confronting powerful and ambitious Republicans with a likely final option to break with him in the name of democracy or curry favor with millions of his ardent fans.

The drumbeat from the GOP high command has grown louder and more consistent in the past day.

  • "Here's how this must work in our great country: Every legal vote should be counted," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell tweeted.
  • "The president should turn this discussion over to his lawyers. And if they have a case to make, there's a process," Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri, a key player in the leadership, told reporters, adding: "I also don't think it's unreasonable for Vice President Biden to accept the unofficial result and do whatever he thinks he should do. Part of the obligation of leadership is you should always have in your mind: 'How do I leave?'"
  • "He is wrong to say that the election was rigged, corrupt and stolen," Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, the party's 2012 nominee, tweeted. "Doing so damages the cause of freedom here and around the world, weakens the institutions that lie at the foundation of the Republic, and recklessly inflames destructive and dangerous passions.
  • "There is no defense for the president's comments tonight undermining our Democratic process," said Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland, a potential 2024 candidate. "America is counting the votes, and we must respect the results as we always have before."
  • "There's simply no evidence anyone has shown me of any widespread corruption or fraud," said Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, who's not seeking re-election in two years. "I endorsed President Trump. I want the next president to be the person who legitimately wins the Electoral College and I will accept whoever that is."
  • "Taking days to count legally cast votes is NOT fraud. And court challenges to votes cast after the legal voting deadline is NOT suppression." tweeted Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is up for re-election in two years.
  • "We should respect that process and ensure that all ballots cast in accordance with state laws are counted. It's that simple," said Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, who also faces the voters in 2022.
  • "It is critical that we give election officials time to complete their jobs, and that we ensure all lawfully cast ballots are allowed and counted,″ said Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who is also up for reelection next time.
  • "If the president's legal team has real evidence, they need to present it immediately to both the public and the courts. In the meantime, all legal votes need to be counted," said Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska.

Taking the other tack were some of Trump's most reliable GOP supporters. "President Trump won this election," House Minority Leader McCarthy of California falsely said on Fox News. "So everyone who is listening, do not be silent about this. We cannot allow this to happen before our very eyes."

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he would donate $500,000 to the president's "legal defense fund," which does not exist. (He could still donate to the reelection campaign, which is paying for the legal challenges.)

Two governors thinking about running for president in four years took Trump's side. "Fight on, exhaust all options," Ron DeSantis of Florida urged Trump. Kristi Noem of South Dakota encouraged him to keep fighting "rigged election systems."

And a likely aspirant in four years, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, tweeted: "If last 24 hours have made anything clear, it's that we need new election integrity laws NOW."

Those voices were not enough for the Trump family.

"The total lack of action from virtually all of the '2024 GOP hopefuls' is pretty amazing," Donald Trump Jr. wrote on Twitter. "They have a perfect platform to show that they're willing & able to fight but they will cower to the media mob instead."

"Where are Republicans!" Eric Trump added about an hour and a half later. "Have some backbone. Fight against this fraud. Our voters will never forget you if your sheep!"

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less