Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

One top Trump appointee's silence means the Biden transition cannot begin

GSA Administrator Emily Murphy

GSA Administrator Emily Murphy has not signed the paperwork necessary to begin the formal transition process.

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty Images

The peaceful transfer of power, the final bedrock of American democracy that Donald Trump has the capacity to crack while he's still president, is now officially off to a delayed start.

Two days after Joe Biden claimed the presidency with a clear majority of electoral votes, the Trump administration has not followed through on the formalities that begin the transition. Each of the 72 days before the inauguration when that does not happen represents time unavailable for responsible, if not good, governance to prevail during a resurgent pandemic.

Instead, the president's lawyers signaled they were pressing ahead with lawsuits in a handful of states, none for now supported by credible evidence of significant election irregularities — let alone the fraud that Trump claims.


The General Services Administration, the agency that manages the bulk of government logistics, must formally recognize Biden has become the president-elect. Only then may his team start spending $10 million in transition funding, conduct background checks for ultimately 4,000 political appointments, and receive access to government officials and records meant to create a seamless handoff of executive authority.

As of Monday the GSA administrator, Trump appointee Emily Murphy, has not signed the necessary paperwork, known formally as an "ascertainment," or given guidance when she will. The law explaining how her agency should "ascertain the apparent successful candidate" appears murky, however, making a delay justifiable at least in the short term.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

At the same time, the president has not conceded that he's lost to Biden and says he will soon appear to "discuss the Mail-In Ballot Hoax!"

The advisory board of the nonpartisan Center for Presidential Transition, made up of prominent members of both parties, prodded the Trump administration Sunday night.

"While there will be legal disputes requiring adjudication, the outcome is sufficiently clear that the transition process must now begin," said the panel, which includes former George W. Bush White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and Mack McLarty, who had the job for Bill Clinton. "We urge the Trump administration to immediately begin the post-election transition process."

There is no precedent in the modern era of a president erecting such hurdles for his successor. But Biden pressed ahead with the power available to him, naming a 10-person panel of coronavirus advisors and assembling teams of aides to work on budgeting, personnel and policy transitions at each department and major agency.

A month ago he announced an ethics plan for a potential transition, with rules designed to make it harder for lobbyists to work on the effort. The guidelines are similar to what Barack Obama set for his transition 12 years ago, generally barring formally registered lobbyists from working on the transition in parts of the government that regulate their clients' businesses.

This summer, the Trump administration also formally promised to provide a Biden transition team with office space, telephone and internet service, travel for the president-elect and national security briefings.

The GSA did not allow the 2000 presidential transition to begin until after the Floridia recount dispute was settled by the Supreme Court, just five weeks before the inauguration. The shortened process was later identified by the 9/11 Commission as contributing to the nation's lack of preparation for the attacks.

Some aspects of the transition can happen without GSA's signoff. Airspace above Biden's Delaware home has been restricted and Secret Service protection for Biden, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris and their families has been ramped up and turned over to the agency's presidential protective detail.

Meanwhile, Trump is pushing for recounts or to disallow batches of votes in a handful of closely contested states — with a focus of the effort in Pennsylvania, the state that all the major news organizations predicted on Saturday that Biden would win, its 20 electoral votes assuring his election. By Monday afternoon the president-elect's margin was almost 46,000 votes in the state, with just 2 percent of ballots to be tabulated.

Top election officials there and in three other battlegrounds with narrow margins — Arizona, Georgia and Nevada — say they have seen no widespread irregularities or fraud. News stories are increasingly quoting Trump attorneys as describing their legal efforts as more about helping their client confront the inevitable than about changing the outcome.

But most senior congressional Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have stayed quiet about the election result.

Read More

Joe Biden being interviewed by Lester Holt

The day after calling on people to “lower the temperature in our politics,” President Biden resort to traditionally divisive language in an interview with NBC's Lester Holt.

YouTube screenshot

One day and 28 minutes

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

This is the latest in “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

One day.

One single day. That’s how long it took for President Joe Biden to abandon his call to “lower the temperature in our politics” following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. “I believe politics ought to be an arena for peaceful debate,” he implored. Not messages tinged with violent language and caustic oratory. Peaceful, dignified, respectful language.

Keep ReadingShow less

Project 2025: The Department of Labor

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, is an ambitious manifesto to redesign the federal government and its many administrative agencies to support and sustain neo-conservative dominance for the next decade. One of the agencies in its crosshairs is the Department of Labor, as well as its affiliated agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

Project 2025 proposes a remake of the Department of Labor in order to roll back decades of labor laws and rights amidst a nostalgic “back to the future” framing based on race, gender, religion and anti-abortion sentiment. But oddly, tucked into the corners of the document are some real nuggets of innovative and progressive thinking that propose certain labor rights which even many liberals have never dared to propose.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump on stage at the Republican National Convention

Former President Donald Trump speaks at the 2024 Republican National Convention on July 18.

J. Conrad Williams Jr.

Why Trump assassination attempt theories show lies never end

By: Michele Weldon: Weldon is an author, journalist, emerita faculty in journalism at Northwestern University and senior leader with The OpEd Project. Her latest book is “The Time We Have: Essays on Pandemic Living.”

Diamonds are forever, or at least that was the title of the 1971 James Bond movie and an even earlier 1947 advertising campaign for DeBeers jewelry. Tattoos, belief systems, truth and relationships are also supposed to last forever — that is, until they are removed, disproven, ended or disintegrate.

Lately we have questioned whether Covid really will last forever and, with it, the parallel pandemic of misinformation it spawned. The new rash of conspiracy theories and unproven proclamations about the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump signals that the plague of lies may last forever, too.

Keep ReadingShow less
Painting of people voting

"The County Election" by George Caleb Bingham

Sister democracies share an inherited flaw

Myers is executive director of the ProRep Coalition. Nickerson is executive director of Fair Vote Canada, a campaign for proportional representations (not affiliated with the U.S. reform organization FairVote.)

Among all advanced democracies, perhaps no two countries have a closer relationship — or more in common — than the United States and Canada. Our strong connection is partly due to geography: we share the longest border between any two countries and have a free trade agreement that’s made our economies reliant on one another. But our ties run much deeper than just that of friendly neighbors. As former British colonies, we’re siblings sharing a parent. And like actual siblings, whether we like it or not, we’ve inherited some of our parent’s flaws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitutional Convention

It's up to us to improve on what the framers gave us at the Constitutional Convention.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

It’s our turn to form a more perfect union

Sturner is the author of “Fairness Matters,” and managing partner of Entourage Effect Capital.

This is the third entry in the “Fairness Matters” series, examining structural problems with the current political systems, critical policies issues that are going unaddressed and the state of the 2024 election.

The Preamble to the Constitution reads:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

What troubles me deeply about the politics industry today is that it feels like we have lost our grasp on those immortal words.

Keep ReadingShow less