Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

This closing argument unites advocates on the left and businesses on the right

early voter

The Democracy Initiative is "working to make sure every vote is counted in this historic election, and to keep polling places safe from the coronavirus and from illegal attempts to intimidate voters."

Scott Olson/Getty Images

The Democracy Initiative is a coalition of 75 progressive groups advocating for voting rights and campaign finance regulation. On the board are Karen Hobert Flynn of Common Cause, Tefere Gebre of the AFL-CIO, Ray Curry of the United Auto Workers union, Derrick Johnson of the NAACP, Virginia Kase of the League of Women Voters, Erich Pica of Friends of the Earth, K. Sabeel Rahman of Demos and Gustavo Torres of CASA.


In the United States, we the people elect our leaders and every voter has the right to have her or his vote counted.

That article of faith has sustained us to this Election Day. But our democracy is facing a severe and unprecedented stress test. During a historically deadly coronavirus pandemic that has remade the campaign, we have seen attempts to make it harder for people to vote safely, efforts backed by "dark money"to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the results; and a new Supreme Court justice rushed through the Senate just days before a presidential election that may very well require a ruling by that very same court.

Despite all these cynical maneuvers, a record-shattering 97 million had already cast their ballots, by mail or in person, by the start of Monday afternoon — suggesting that, by the time voting ends Tuesday, the share of eligible voters turning out will be greater than in more than a century. It will be up to state and local election officials, not any candidate, to process, count and certify the results.

There are no sidelines in our democracy. Every citizen, regardless of party; every nonprofit organization, regardless of mission; and every business, regardless of industry, has a role to play in standing up for civil society, the rule of law and the peaceful transfer of power after an election. We take these things for granted in the United States — but there is no law of politics or physics that guarantees a stable democratic outcome. We the people do that.

Our organizations are part of a vibrant grassroots democracy movement fighting to expand ballot access and create more equitable, healthy options for voting. As detailed in our "Roadblocks and Remedies" report, our movement has successfully won voting reforms in dozens of states. As a result, all but five states are allowing absentee voting without an excuse this fall and all but seven states had early in-person voting.

The story of voting, however, doesn't end when a ballot is cast. It's got to be counted. And we'll be making sure that happens.

Along with other civic organizations, we're working to make sure every vote is counted in this historic election, and to keep polling places safe from the coronavirus and from illegal attempts to intimidate voters. And we have been engaged in coast-to-coast voter education, explaining that this year's final results will probably not be available on Tuesday night. Counting tens of millions of vote-by-mail ballots may take more time than usual. It's more important to get it right than to get it done fast.

We're encouraged that business leaders from organizations including the Business Roundtable, the Chamber of Commerce, the Leadership Now Project and the Civic Alliance have joined the effort to ensure a fair and transparent electoral process. All these groups are urging patience and civility during the time it takes for local and state election officials to count every vote. Players associations from major sports leagues have actively promoted civic engagement and voting too. And it's good to see the Major League Baseball and NFL commissioners have signed the Civic Alliance statement on election integrity.

This common-sense pledge to uphold the integrity of our democracy deserves support from every private sector employer. Business leaders have enormous influence with both political parties. The private sector also gains enormous benefit from the long history of political stability in the United States. This, in turn, creates the stable labor, capital and consumer markets that drive sales, revenue and profits.

As business leaders learned in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder, keeping a low profile during periods of social and political controversy is not an option in today's fast-moving, information-hungry environment. Standing together, business and civil society can send a strong message that we won't tolerate any false claims about our elections or any attempt to manipulate results and overturn the will of voters.

It's inspiring to see tens of millions of Americans sending in their mail ballots, standing in line to vote and taking active steps to participate in our democracy. We owe them a free and fair election, with every vote counted and all results respected. That's our mission in the coming days. The more people, organizations and businesses who join us, the greater our voice will be — not only on Election Day but in the crucial days to follow.

Read More

Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

If approved, the Democracy Voucher program would bring in $4.5 million each year through a property tax.

Road Red Runner/Adobe Stock

Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

A public funding mechanism for Seattle elections is up for renewal in next week's election.

The Democracy Voucher program was passed 10 years ago. It offers voters four $25 vouchers to use each election cycle for candidates who accept certain fundraising and spending limits. Supporters said it is a model for more inclusive democracy, touting higher turnout, increased participation from more small donors and a more diverse candidate field.

Spencer Olson, spokesperson for the group People Powered Elections Seattle, which supports Proposition 1, said the program helps level the playing field.

"It's really important that people's voices are heard and that candidates can run being supported by their constituents," Olson contended. "Versus just listening to those wealthiest donors, those special interests that have historically been the loudest voices at the table and really dominated what priorities rise to the top."

The voucher is supported by a property tax. Olson and other supporters hope to bring the model statewide. Critics said the program is not big enough to make a difference in elections and has not curbed outside spending. Ballots are due by 8 p.m. Tuesday.

Olson pointed out the vouchers have succeeded in encouraging more diverse participation in local elections.

"The intention of the program was to bring a public financing program to Seattle elections to help empower more candidates -- more diverse candidates, women, renters, people of color -- to have equal access to be able to run, and run competitive elections without having to rely on wealthy donors, special interests," Olson emphasized.

Olson noted because the money comes from a dedicated tax levy, unused vouchers roll over to the next election.

"The goal isn't to create an unlimited pot of money but to be able to provide resources for candidates to run with the community's support," Olson stressed. "But it's not a blank check at the same time."

Eric Tegethoff is a journalist covering the Northwest for Public News Service.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi
- YouTube

Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's interview series engages diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This initiative is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

The latest interview in this series features Rahmin Sarabi, founder and Director of the American Public Trust, an organization dedicated to promoting and implementing deliberative democracy practices, such as citizen assemblies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”

President Donald Trump finally acknowledged there is “real starvation” in Gaza—a reality that has generated momentum among holdout countries to recognize a State of Palestine, as 147 of 193 U.N. members have already done. Trump claims that this impermissibly “rewards Hamas.” Concerns about the optics of “rewarding” a militant group that is not the country’s government should not drive the decision to recognize Palestine as a state or the decision to maintain diplomatic relations with its government.

Countries that have already recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and the fact that the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) forms a defined geographic area with a government and a population—the traditional criteria for statehood. Countries that have not recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) lack of effective control over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and to the idea that recognition can be used as future diplomatic leverage. But waiting to recognize a state of Palestine until after there is a negotiated agreement between Israel and the PA is an outdated position that amounts to “kicking the can” down an interminable road.

Keep ReadingShow less