Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In pursuit of happiness: The case for national self-reflection

life coach

Life coaching, and other introspective measures, only work if we're willing to adapt, writes Molineaux.

Lucy Lambriex/Getty Images

Molineaux is president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, is a 501(c)(3) organization that houses The Fulcrum.


I have always been self-reflective. It was my coping mechanism during bouts of family drama, when I would escape to my room and think. In the days before screens took all our attention, I read a lot and journaled a little. With therapy as a young adult and coach training for a midlife career change, I got to know myself well. When I looked at where I wanted to contribute, I landed in politics — with a starry-eyed dream that we could collectively advance our nation via coaching everyone.

My journey of self-discovery, improvement and actualization brings joy to me and many benefits as I work in the rough and tumble of politics. A few are:

  • Knowing I am inherently a good person.
  • Trusting myself.
  • Carrying a sense of peace within myself, sharing it with others.
  • Ability to be vulnerable and overcoming the fear of being hurt.
  • Understanding the thoughts that are truly mine, compared to thoughts others would like me to believe (family, culture, media, etc.).
  • Fearlessness in facing my own beliefs about others and the world at large.
  • Befriending my emotions as tools to understand myself better.

I could go on and on. Yes, I like myself, just as I am.

When I was working as a coach, I had a particularly challenging client. Week after week, she failed to keep her agreements to self-reflect. So I asked her why she was avoiding looking inside herself.

"I don't find myself that interesting," was her response.

At that moment, I realized coaching wouldn't work for her. She wanted the world around her to change to her preferences. She wasn't committed to adapting or accepting the world as it was; to examine what was inside herself that caused her resentment. We parted ways soon after.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

I suspect the majority of us (Americans) would like our life circumstances to magically adapt to accommodate our preferences. In this current age of the attention economy, we've been catered to by "the customer is always right" thinking perpetuated by advertisers, entertainment platforms and social media to believe it IS possible to create our world just the way we like it.

IRL (in real life) of course, that's not how people, communities or the world works. We are not customers of democracy or consumers of politics. We must be participants.

Good relational skills help us navigate, negotiate and motivate ourselves to meet our needs with others in our day-to-day lives. How often do we self-reflect about our own navigation (what is our purpose?), negotiation (what are deal-breakers?) or motivation (what are we willing to do?)? Our families, communities and nation would be stronger if we stopped to take a look.

Which brings us to Maslow's hierarchy of needs. There is a reason that self-actualization is the pinnacle in the hierarchy. When people are focused on meeting their physical and emotional needs, stopping for self-actualization or personal growth is "one more thing" that requires time and energy. If there is not enough time or energy, people never quite get to their personal growth. It's not necessary for survival. I postulate that self-fulfillment (a benefit of personal growth) is necessary for sustained happiness. And further, that for the American experiment to succeed, collective personal growth is necessary.

Maslow's Hierarchy of NeedsArayabandit/Getty Images

When I first contemplated jumping into politics, I was at a crossroads in my life. I had left the soul-killing (for me) work of advertising and marketing. I was a full-time, self-employed executive life coach. My physical and emotional needs were met. But I was still restless and dissatisfied. That is the moment when transformative self-actualization began for me.

"Aren't you ever content?" was the complaint lodged by my then-husband.

He was right — and wrong. Right that I'm rarely content. I love the motivation of being dissatisfied with the status quo and striving for the next thing. I love the rush of endorphins as I co-create something new and innovative with friends and colleagues. I love the journey to deeper understanding of myself, others and our nation. If I'm not moving towards a better future, I'm not happy. But he was wrong that being content was a destination at which to arrive and live out our days.

Pulling back to the perspective of the nation — are we at a moment where we are struggling to survive? Or could our discontent be a sign that we are beginning a self-actualization process, collectively as Americans? I would say that is exactly what is happening.

Culturally, we paused after the turbulent '60s and '70s. We needed a break to embody and recover from seemingly rapid change. Our focus shifted from the continued expansion and security of civil rights to more individual needs. Our discontent was pushed aside for a while. And now we are dissatisfied again because it is time for us to move on, to think about our collective needs. This is our journey to manifest our potential government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Contentment for a moment in time is a great place to rest. But it's the JOURNEY that keeps us alive. That exploration of who we are as a people. How much we can achieve or co-create to make our lives, our communities and our nation a better place to live. And a healthier planet to live upon.

For my former client who didn't find herself interesting and the Americans who think it's "those people" who are to blame for our current situation, I would advise to pause for self-reflection anyway. If you are experiencing feelings of hatred, contempt or disgust, how are those emotions helping our nation? If you feel superior to others who "don't get it," how is your superiority helping our nation?

In our republic, our democratic values are made up of our collective selves. As it is with each of us individually, it is the same with democracy. Democracy is not a destination but a journey to evolve and improve. This is both an individual and community responsibility and only by taking this path together will we heal the wounds that divide us.

At this moment in our nation's history, we have a lot to lose. And a lot to gain if we can get it right.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less