Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

After the Ukraine bloodbath: Containment, dystopia or evolved enlightenment?

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

Actions by Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump bookend beginning of a new era, writes Stein.

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Stein is an organizational and political strategist who has worked with dozens of for-profit, not-for-profit and political and public sector organizations over the past 50 years. He currently serves as a researcher/writer, consultant and champion of the work of cross-partisan cultural and political organizations and initiatives.

The brutal, unrelenting Russian assault on Ukraine may continue far longer than we can imagine. If and when it finally is constrained by some form of international agreement, the months and years following that fragile understanding will represent a monumental inflection point for humanity and the civilized world.

There are many ways in which the family of nations will process what has happened, what real and perceived lessons have been learned, and how nation states and international relationships might evolve.


While there are many options for how the new world order could emerge, the following scenarios are intended to describe the most likely broad categories:

  • Coldest containment. The world slides into a more dangerous and volatile version of last century’s unending, and at times escalating, Cold War with regional power blocs constantly threatening their neighbors and asserting their dominance regionally and globally. Such saber-rattling antagonists probably would include North Korea, China, Iran and Russia.
  • Darkest dystopia. In this scenario, the rape of Ukraine will have been a tipping point into a continuing descent into the hell of division, hatred and violence. The world will have devolved into a 21st century jungle — a harsh and brutal dystopia ruled by might, power and privilege. The lethal tools of modernity — cyber, chemical, nuclear, biological, hypersonic — would be the weapons of choice for continuing and escalating brutality exercised by stronger countries against both perceived global adversaries and their weaker regional prey. In this option, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and perhaps other modern weaponized autocratic nation-states are the most likely aggressors.
  • Evolved enlightenment. In this scenario, our battered and broken world discovers the will, courage and means of ushering in an era of human enlightenment and positive political, economic and cultural evolution in which the family of nations finds new accommodations with one another, constructive international institutional arrangements, and productive means of resolving differences without resorting to threats and violence. While this outcome may seem the least likely at this fraught moment, and particularly to hardened international affairs analysts, pundits, academics and journalists, it is neither impossible to imagine nor unattainable.

Context

If Donald Trump’s descent down the faux golden elevator in Trump Tower on June 16, 2015, to announce his candidacy for the presidency of the United States was the beginning of a dystopian American political era and a profoundly uncertain new world order, Vladimir Putin’s descent into the purgatory he unleashed upon Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022 will likely be seen, however lethal the siege still may become, as the cataclysmic end of that beginning.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

While seven years — roughly 2,500 days — is but a blink of an eye in the course of human history, the enormity of change that these two events have set into motion is as momentous for our now fractured 245-year-old country as it has become for the increasingly fragile community of nations.

And, if we are witnessing the end of a beginning in the history of our modern world, what and wither does the future hold for the community of nations, our planet’s 7.5 billion inhabitants, and our born and unborn progeny?

The course of any dramatic change — at personal, communal or global levels — is rarely predictable. And seismic change, even if occasioned by familiar, albeit demonstrably evil, perpetrators, can never be knowable. So, in this fraught and dispiriting moment, as we approach the end of this beginning of new levels of aggression and brutality at both home and abroad, we are without precedent, prescience, knowledge or know-how to predict the near- or long-term fate of our country, our species, or to even have meaningful insight into our shorter-term futures.

The inevitable, prolonged uncertainty about whether we are more likely to continue to grovel in some threatening and unresolved state of “coldest containment,” devolve into a “deepest dystopia” or emerge from the shadowy caves of our descents over these past seven years into an “evolved enlightenment” undoubtedly will continue to feed relentless speculation and engender great fear, anxiety and additional fraught consequences.

Is evolved enlightenment possible?

Conventional wisdom is rarely hopeful. And as our psyches and bodies continue to suffer the horrors of the global pandemic, the erosion of truth, trust, reason and civility around the world, the Trump era, and now the Ukrainian assault, our lived experiences are not conducive to hope-inspired aspirational thinking.

And yet, there is sufficient wisdom from the ages, and an elegant truth about the human condition and human nature itself, that should be cause for at least a glimmer of hope: Despite our miseries, fears and present experiences, human thriving may not be extinct, and perhaps, just maybe, we can both imagine and inspire evolutionary advancement and survival of our species.

The wisdom is this: While there is clear and present evidence of the existence of evil in the world, our collective kindnesses to one another and our preternatural instincts for hyper-cooperation, even in dire times, generally have overcome the greatest adversities besetting our frequently beleaguered species.

Humanity’s myriad accomplishments, our profound accumulation of knowledge throughout the ages, the marvels of science, the beauties of art, the wonders of our imaginations, our astounding productivity, creativity and inventiveness, and the expansion of liberties, justice and opportunities for billions of people over the millennia are all resounding testaments to our collective capacity to both survive and thrive in spite of our weaknesses, failings and the injustices we perpetrate.

The elegant truth about our species is that we individually and collectively are able to learn, change and evolve our thinking, relationships and actions:

"The future is not some place we are going to,
but one we are creating,
The paths are not to be found, but made,
and the activity of making them
changes both the maker and the destination."
— John Schaar, University of California, Santa Cruz

The traumas of the present, and the foggy uncertainties of the immediate future, will certainly conspire to cloud the clarity we will have to conjure in order to believe in our agency to craft our future in an image of hopeful enlightenment.

Faith is a human attribute derived from an improbable belief in what cannot now be seen, known or knowable. It is not simply a religious construct, but a confidence derived from unknowable recesses within self, community, and capacities lurking in the infinite possibilities of hopes and dreams poised to be realized.

We are entering uncharted territory in the human saga at a moment of severe shock and dislocation. And while there are no guarantees for what comes next, the potential for survival and thriving are within our grasp as surely as are relentlessly contained hostilities or further descent into endless abyss.

In the immortal words of Abraham Lincoln, the challenge for the community of nations now, as it was for our own country 160 years ago during our nation’s divisive Civil War, is to dispense with failed solutions and open our minds, together, in “concert” to new and productive possibilities:

“….we can succeed only by concert. It is not can any of us imagine better?”, but can we all do better?” The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise — with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country.”
-Abraham Lincoln, Annual Message to Congress, imploring the nation to emancipate the slaves, December 1, 1862

Having witnessed, over the past seven years, the horrors of evil up close, personal and in real time, it would seem as though this is another precise moment in human history for the community of nations to “disenthrall” ourselves of our deeply troubled past in order to “think” and “act anew.”

There is, and should be, cause for hope that we are wiser, and therefore better equipped, than perhaps ever before to have the faith, will and courage to forge the constructive interpersonal relationships, and productive international and institutional alliances, that will support human thriving, species well-being and planetary sustainability.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less