Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What to watch for in the Jan. 6 committee’s final hearing

What to watch for in the Jan. 6 committee’s final hearing

The select committee charged with investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol, which resulted in multiple deaths and more than 100 injured police officers, will hold its final hearing Thursday afternoon.

In addition to wrapping up the panel’s case against former President Donald Trump, the hearing may also provide a swan song for the committee’s two Republican members, who have been ostracized from the party for their involvement. Rep. Lynn Cheney of Wyoming lost her primary this summer and Rep. Adam Kinzinger announced last year he would not seek reelection after learning the new congressional map for Illinois would have put him in a primary against a Trump ally.

The committee tweeted Wednesday that it will “present the key facts we’ve uncovered during our investigation.” Essentially, this hearing will be the committee’s closing argument in advance of the midterms, when election deniers and people who took part in the insurrection will be on the ballot.

The hearing will be carried live on many television networks and will be streamed online.


If the hearing goes as expected, committee members will pull together the evidence that Trump instigated the riot, in which his supporters overran barriers, paraded through the Capitol, and broke into the Senate chamber and Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The hearing will include evidence that Trump was warned about ongoing violence but still tweeted out attacks on Vice President Mike Pence, Politico reports.

The committee’s work may be used as fodder for a possible federal case against Trump.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat on the panel, said Wednesday that the committee will leave no doubts about Trump’s role in instigating the riot.

He said the committee has new documents and statements describing Trump’s involvement. “None of this would have happened except for the will of Donald Trump,” Raskin told CNN.

The hearing had originally been scheduled for Sept. 28 but was postponed while parts of the nation prepared for Hurricane Ian to strike. Following today’s hearing, the committee is expected to complete a formal report that will be made public.

When the select committee was first created, Pelosi rejected two of the Republicans assigned to it by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, citing prior criticism of the panel by Reps. Jim Banks and Jim Jordan as well as their votes against certification of the election. After McCarthy rescinded all five of his nominees in retaliation, Pelosi invited Cheney and Kinzinger – both of whom had been vocal critics of Trump – to serve. They accepted, cementing their role as outcasts among the GOP.

Rep. Stephanie Murphy, a Democrat from Florida who also serves on the committee, is retiring as well.

Further reading about today’s hearing:

    Read More

    majority vs minority
    Sanga Park/Getty Images

    Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

    Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

    What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

    Not necessarily!

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Donald Trump

    Former President Donald Trump

    Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

    Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

    Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

    After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

    Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

    I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

    Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

    Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

    Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

    To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

    Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

    Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

    It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

    Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

    The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

    I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

    Keep ReadingShow less