Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump loves melodrama, but it’s bad for us

Donald Trump
James Devaney/GC Images

Molineaux is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

I’m alternately fascinated and repulsed by the shenanigans of the former president and his enablers/cronies.

The fascination is with the melodrama – the exaggerated emotions, stereotypical characters and interpersonal conflicts. Within a melodrama, only three roles are available: the victim (usually a damsel in distress, but, in this case, our nation), the hero (played by the system or Donald Trump) and the villain (again, the system or Trump). If you remember Dudley Do-Right, you know melodrama. When I used to attend the campy theater in my hometown, the audience was united in cheering for the hero, booing the villain and sighing for the damsel. Audience participation is part of the fun. The music (best when it is a live piano!) would signal to the audience the appropriate response. The end of the melodrama was assured – the hero would rescue the damsel from the villain. The villain would be served up for justice.

The repulsion is in how we’ve allowed this plot of exaggerated emotions, stereotypical characters and interpersonal conflicts to define our desire and ability to govern the republic.

Our nation should not be a campy melodrama.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter


The friends and allies of the United States wonder what the hell has happened. I wonder too. It’s time to turn off the melodrama (including ALL cable news channels) until they begin covering the news again. Not the melodrama.

Let’s throw the cold water of rational thinking on our fascination with Trump. There are facts. There is speculation. There are distractions to keep us in the melodrama. In other words, let’s break it down into components so we can move beyond the simple plot that will destroy our nation.

What we know as fact:

  1. The FBI executed a legal search warrant on Mar-a-Lago on Aug 8.
  2. The FBI removed 11 sets of classified materials within more than 20 boxes, plus miscellaneous items that were deemed to belong to the National Archives.
  3. In June 2022, a lawyer representing Trump signed an affidavit saying all classified documents had been returned.
  4. Threats against the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have increased following the execution of the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago.

What is speculated:

  1. Documents seized may have included information about nuclear weapons.
  2. Trump claims he declassified the documents before leaving office and/or his taking of them automatically declassified the documents.
  3. Trump kept the documents for many speculated, yet unknown, purposes.
  4. Unauthorized people may have had access to documents that are top secret.
  5. National security of our allies (the Five Eyes) may have been compromised.

And as Steve Bannon, former advisor to Trump has noted, one way to “win” is to “flood the zone with sh*t.” Which leads us to the intentional distractions by many, which keep our attention on the melodrama instead of using our rational minds.

The distractions:

  1. The FBI planted classified material.
  2. Trump’s remarks about “the country being on fire” was seen as a threat to AG Merrick Garland.
  3. Trump has offered to “help his country in any way he can” was an attempt to walk back that threat.
  4. Hillary Clinton’s emails were the same.

Notice all the qualifying words in the speculation category. “May have” is a phrase used to make an assertion with an escape clause. “I heard” or “they say” are other such phrases that lend themselves to misinterpretation, on purpose. For the distraction category, these spring from false claims that are repeated endlessly but never substantiated with evidence. Evidence is documents, sworn statements and video.

Am I still fascinated by the melodrama? Am I human? That’s a definite yes to both!

I’m also a rational person who notes what is happening despite the melodrama. President Biden has signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act. While misnamed, it addresses much of the so-called “soft” infrastructure promises for climate change mitigation, Medicare stabilization and corporate taxes. Last week saw the passage of legislation to take care of veterans who were put in harm’s way and denied care. Congress also passed the CHIPS Act, which will, in time, make us more nationally self-reliant on technology. Fuel prices are dropping and inflation has slowed. This is the news, if only we paid attention.

A few weeks ago, I facilitated a Q&A session with co-sponsors of the Building Civic Bridges Act, which would fund local organizations and spaces for citizens to hone our skills to engage in healthy citizenship. We all need to take one small step in leaving the melodrama behind and re-entering the world of democratic values and practice.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans wrapped in a flag

"We must reaffirm the principles under which our country will function," writes Goodrich.

SeventyFour/Getty Images

Together, we can save our democracy

Goodrich is the president and CEO of The Center for Organizational Excellence.

Our democracy is being challenged and, if lost, will impact our way of life in more ways than most may realize. I have given a lot of thought as to why our country’s political environment is in such chaos, facing significant turmoil that challenges our present and our future.

It is important to note that I am truly politically independent. I do not carry the water of any political party and always attempt to consider what is in the best interest of our country. I can have both conservative and liberal tendencies, depending on the issue being addressed, and believe at times each party goes to unhelpful extremes. Occasionally they get it right, but perhaps it’s time to rethink our two-party model.

The foundation of our democracy is the Constitution. I believe it is an imperfect document but provides a strong foundation for the democracy it established. I am in awe that the Founding Fathers thought so much through that it is still applicable today. Every American should read it, and there are “plain language” versions online if it helps. While still strong, it perhaps needs some updating, expanded explanation and more precise language.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

On Jan. 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump exhorted followers to object to the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Why 14th Amendment bars Trump from office

Graber is the University System of Maryland Regents Professor of Law at the University of Maryland.

In 2024, former President Donald Trump will face some of his greatest challenges: criminal court cases, primary opponents and constitutional challenges to his eligibility to hold the office of president again. The Colorado Supreme Court has pushed that latter piece to the forefront, ruling on Dec. 19, 2023, that Trump cannot appear on Colorado’s 2024 presidential ballot because of his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

Keep ReadingShow less