Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How not to let this virus threaten our democracy: Invest in young voters.

College-age voters
Ariel Skelley/Getty Images
Barba is senior director of external affairs for Young Invincibles, which works to magnify the impact younger voters are having on the political process and expand their economic opportunities.
As the coronavirus pandemic continues to spread, its impacts are being felt everywhere. Hospitals are clamoring for the medical equipment they need to save lives, and almost every corner of the economy continues to reel.

In a rare show of bipartisanship, Congress has come together to produce three packages aimed at combating that economic devastation. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act enacted last month will invest more than $2 trillion into the economy — even wisely dedicating funds to help state election officials prepare for the 2020 election. Another stimulus bill is moving this week on Capitol Hill.

But even with the extraordinary federal investments already made, a staggering amount of uncertainty still surrounds voting for the rest of the year. The public health emergency and its stay-at-home orders nearly nationwide have forced more than a dozen states to delay primaries.

As timelines show a slowing of the Covid-19 spread continuing to extend into late summer, our elected leaders need to start asking themselves an important question: What happens if the coronavirus impacts the November election?

Unfortunately, widespread confusion and uncertainty is likely to get worse for voters before it gets better. Even in the best scenarios, voters will inevitably face questions about where to vote, if their election is being held, alternatives to voting in person and complying with federal guidelines for ensuring their own safety.

The latest coronavirus aid package looks to be relatively tightly focused on replenishing the stimulus programs, keeping small businesses afloat, helping hospitals and expanding virus testing.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Talk of what might be in a fifth coronavirus package is already getting started, however, and thankfully those discussions are focused partly on helping state and local governments ensure the bedrock institutions of our nation are protected. And an essential part of that needs to be helping young voters get the information they need to find their polling location, register to vote and actually cast their ballot.

Experts on voting behavior have extensively documented the unique challenges facing college students trying to vote. These include voter ID laws, limited on-campus polling locations, cumbersome proof-of-residency requirements, inflexible work and school schedules, the sudden closing or changing of polling places, lack of child care or elder care, and hours-long wait times to cast a vote.

Meanwhile, today's students are the most diverse in history — with more student-parents, first-generation students, low-income students and students of color than ever before. So we can safely assume these barriers will impact more students as you add the coronavirus into an already confusing voting process.

Students deserve clear information on how, where and when they can vote. That's why we are pressing Speaker Nancy Pelosi to include legislation dubbed the HSVA, for the Help Students Vote Act, in the next legislation.

The HSVA has been gathering congressional support for years and was included in the comprehensive democracy reform package, dubbed HR 1, the House passed last year. Championed by Cory Booker of New Jersey in the Senate and a fellow Democrat in the House, Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, the bill would empower colleges and universities with the resources they need to ensure their students know how to vote, where to vote and where they can go to get their questions answered.

With so much uncertainty facing voters this November, it's as important as ever that new voters have a trusted source of reliable voting information. The HSVA would instruct each college or university to designate a campus vote coordinator to be responsible for providing up-to-date voting information, be available to answer student questions and communicate with their campus about upcoming deadlines.

Students already look to their colleges and universities to help them transition into adulthood and understand how to navigate complex processes for the first time. In fact, more than 500 institutions nationwide have already recognized this important responsibility and designated a campus vote coordinator. By including the HSVA in coronavirus legislation, Congress can ensure these resources are available to every student — whether they attend a four-year college, community college, tech college or any other institute of higher learning.

But advocates need to start talking to their members of Congress about the HSVA now. We need to make it clear to Congress that ensuring voters have the information they need to cast a ballot isn't negotiable. It's the most fundamental right we have, and we have a responsibility to ensure everyone can exercise it.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less