Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Charlie Kirk’s Farewell Marred by Political Divisions

News

Charlie Kirk’s Farewell Marred by Political Divisions

President Donald Trump speaks to mourners at State Farm Stadium in Phoenix, Arizona, to honor Charlie Kirk (September 21, 2025)

Credit: Alex Segura

Today, more than 70,000 mourners filled State Farm Stadium in Phoenix, Arizona, to honor Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, who was shot and killed on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University.

The memorial, held just eleven days after the attack, was not only a funeral—it was a vivid reflection of how grief, ideology, and national identity now converge in American public life. Inside the stadium, home of the NFL’s Arizona Cardinals, the atmosphere oscillated between solemn remembrance and political rally. Thousands more gathered outside under tight security, underscoring the scale and sensitivity of the moment.


President Donald Trump headlined the service, elevating Kirk’s legacy to symbolic heights. “He’s a martyr now, for America, for freedom,” Trump declared. “None of us will ever forget Charlie Kirk, and neither now will history.” The line drew a standing ovation and quickly circulated across social media, solidifying Kirk’s transformation from activist to emblem.

Charlie Kirk’s Death Sparks Martyrdom Narrative Amid Rising Political Violence

File:Charlie Kirk - 53069222184.jpg - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org


Vice President J.D. Vance joined other speakers in portraying Kirk as a voice for young conservatives who felt sidelined by liberal institutions. Supporters waved flags, chanted slogans, and wore Turning Point USA gear, creating a visual tableau that mirrored the movement Kirk helped build. Among them were Tyler and Caleb Dickey, cousins from Tyler, Texas, who drove 16 hours overnight to attend.

“It felt like everything was going wrong before we left,” Tyler told The Fulcrum. “But that only made it clearer that we were supposed to come. Our actions need to represent our ideology—not just sit at home and complain, but stand up and do something.” Caleb added, “Charlie showed you can engage with people who disagree and still do it peacefully. His stand reminds us we do not have to be fearful. Everybody needs to be Charlie Kirk.”

For both young men, Kirk’s message was ultimately spiritual in nature. “At the end of the day, the most important thing Charlie preached was Jesus Christ,” Tyler said, his voice breaking. “He took a stand for his faith. We need to do the same, no matter the cost.” Their reflections echoed a broader theme: Kirk’s death was not just a personal loss—it became a rallying cry.

Yet not all viewed the memorial through the same lens. Progressive voices expressed concern over the politicization of the mourning process. “This wasn’t just a family farewell,” one Democratic strategist told The Fulcrum. “It was a stage for Trump and the right to canonize Kirk as a martyr. That inflames tensions at a time when the country desperately needs cooler heads.”

Civil rights advocates warned of deepening divides. Turning Point USA has long shaped conservative campus politics, and critics argue that framing Kirk as a fallen hero risks hardening ideological fault lines—between students, communities, and even families.

With the 2026 midterms approaching, Kirk’s story is poised to remain central to Republican messaging: a young conservative who rose quickly, faced fierce opposition, and died violently. For many on the right, his legacy embodies a movement that sees itself under siege. Progressives, meanwhile, face a strategic dilemma—how to respond without reinforcing the narrative. Some call for renewed focus on preventing political violence; others insist the myth-making must be challenged head-on.

In the end, Charlie Kirk’s memorial was more than a tribute. It was a mirror—reflecting the hopes, fears, and fractures of a nation still searching for common ground.

Alex Segura is a bilingual, multiple-platform journalist based in Southern California.


Read More

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

Ring–Fitzgerald Homestead, Will County (1987). A house still true to its original form, carrying forward the Rings’ steadiness, aspiration, and good citizenship across five generations.

Photo courtesy by Patrick Fitzgerald.

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

They got an early start; the morning light came on fast. The Ring siblings were headed to the Joliet depot with young Angela in tow — the same depot where Lincoln’s funeral train had passed in silence thirty years earlier. Now they were bound for the White City, forty miles northeast. The Columbian Exposition was a turning point for both Angela and America. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show, pitched just outside the fairgrounds, rivaled the Exhibition itself.

One photograph captured it all. Taken in a fairground photo booth, the Ring siblings stood in their summer clothes, huddled around eleven-year-old Angela. Their faces were bright and open — a single moment preserved in time. Determined to outshine the 1889 Paris Exhibition and its Eiffel Tower, Chicago answered with George Ferris’s great wheel. At night, the city glowed, outlined in electric white light.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less