Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bipartisan efforts increasing among elected officials

Rep. Susie Lee

Rep. Susie Lee of Nevada was one of four members of Congress to achieve perfect marks in the latest update to the Common Ground Scorecard.

The Washington Post/Getty Images

Meyers is executive editor of The Fulcrum.

While much of the political discourse revolves around the nation being hopelessly divided, there are a number of politicians who are working across the aisle. To help voters identify such people, the Common Ground Committee measures elected officials and candidates on their bipartisan efforts. The Common Ground Scorecard was recently updated in advance of the 2024 elections — and includes some record numbers.


The scorecard measures individuals across broad categories that include official actions, public statements and promises for future behavior. For the first time, someone achieved a perfect score in the 2024 report. In fact, four people earned 110 out of 110 points: Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), Rep. Don Davis (D-N.C.), Sen. Maggie Hasson (D-Nev.) and Rep. Susie Lee (D-Nev.). Coincidentally, Bacon, Davis and Lee were all recently named finalists for Democracy Awards, given out by the Congressional Management Foundation for outstanding public service on Capitol Hill.

“Hardworking families in southern Nevada care less about political parties and more about common sense solutions. That’s why I’ve worked with Republicans to lower costs, create jobs, support law enforcement and keep Americans safe at home and abroad,” said Lee. “I’m proud to have been named the most bipartisan member of Congress and I will continue working with my Republican colleagues to help Nevada’s families, small businesses, seniors and veterans.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

This year, there was a 53 percent increase in the number of people earning the title of “champion” for reaching the highest tier of scores, jumping from 34 in 2023 to 52.

“Legislation requires cooperation just to get out of committees in Congress and be considered for a vote. That means partisanship gets in the way of finding solutions to the significant issues facing our nation,” said Erik Olsen, co-founder and CEO of Common Ground Committee.

The average score across House members, governors and presidential candidates is 31, up 3 points from the previous update and up 6 points (25 percent) from the scorecard’s launch in 2020.

“This small increase is a sign we are moving in the right direction, but there is still a long way to go,” Olsen said.

Among the ways people earn points are: supporting bipartisan legislation (as measured by the Lugar Center’s Bipartisan Index), demonstrating bipartisan job approval ratings, having public conversations or events with someone from the opposite party, being a members in any of a selection of across-the-aisle congressional caucuses, promoting common ground in public communications (and losing points for derogatory or violent language) and affirming a series of common ground commitments developed by the CGC.

Individuals can earn 10 bonus points for “a bold, exceptional act championing common ground.” This can include leading the way on bipartisan legislation, writing a bipartisan op-ed or winning an award for common ground efforts.

Since April 2023, a number of individuals have made huge jumps in their scores.

Leading the way is Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), who increased 83 points to a total of 100. Rep. Eric Sorensen (D-Ill.) saw his score increase 77 points to 84. Nine others earned increases of at least 50 points. Both Lawler and Sorenson increased their scores by doing more bipartisan legislating, affirming the CGC’s “Common Grounder Commitments,” joining a bipartisan caucus, engaging in public events with someone from the other party, writing an op-ed with someone from the other party and speaking publicly about finding common ground.

According to Olsen, more and more members of Congress have engaged with the Common Ground Committee and sought ways to improve their scores.

“We have had a significant increase in the number of members and staff reaching out to us to discuss how to increase their scores and send us information about their bipartisan activities,” he said. “Sometimes, this will impact scores, and sometimes, it will not. But there is a clear interest among certain members in working towards bipartisanship.”

For example, over the past year CGC saw a 39 percent increase in the number of people agreeing to the Common Ground Commitments, which are:

I will identify and set aside personal biases.
I will commit to seek agreement, progress, and solutions.
I will listen first to learn perspectives and experiences.
I will not assume, but seek to understand motives and intentions.
I will seek outcomes all can live with but not compromise principles.
I will accept that good people may disagree.
I will use and accept facts.
I will stay respectful.
I will resist demonizing.
I will de-escalate hostile situations.

The scorecard also measures how the presidential candidates perform. President Joe Biden’s score has held steady at 30 since January 2023, when it fell from a personal high of 45. His score is based on positive talk about finding common ground and winning an award for civility in public life from Allegheny College. Donald Trump’s score has never budged from the lowest end of the scale: negative 20 points, based on his insults and crude descriptions of his political opponents. Neither Biden nor Trump received any points — positive or negative — in other categories.

In addition to Trump, nine others were given negative scores, including Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Rep. Federica Wilson (D-Fla.), who all matched the former president’s negative 20 score.

Read More

Democrats are from Mars, Republicans are from Venus

A simulation of two planets in space.

Getty Images, Jose A. Bernat Bacete

Democrats are from Mars, Republicans are from Venus

As I think about Tuesday’s address by President Donald Trump and the response of Senator Elissa Slotkin from Michigan—a former CIA analyst and a rising star in the Democratic Party—I am reminded of the book “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus” by John Gray published in 1992.

A sequel should be written today: “Democrats Are from Mars, Republicans Are from Venus”…..or vice versa since the planet they each are from doesn’t matter.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig
us a flag on pole during daytime
Photo by Zetong Li on Unsplash

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This series is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

I’m excited to start this series by highlighting an interview with Julia Roig, the Chief Network Weaver for the Horizons Project. Julia brings extensive experience working for democratic change around the world, and her work at the Horizons Project focuses on supporting and building the broader pro-democracy ecosystem.

Keep ReadingShow less
One party worked harder to build a bigger tent in 2024
Getty Images, tadamichi

One party worked harder to build a bigger tent in 2024

Democrats keep pointing fingers for reasons they lost last November. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s new role leading the Department of Health and Human Services underscores an important factor deserving more attention: Democrats spent millions trying to bully Kennedy, Jill Stein, and other insurgents off the ballot rather than respect their supporters. They treated it as a strategic masterstroke, but their anti-democratic bet was a miscalculation.

In a change election resulting in the closest popular vote since 2000, hypocrisy was a fatal sin. Democrats would have benefited from embracing competition and building a bigger tent of their own, not fighting against voter choice. It was not enough to stand up for the rule of law and protection of voting rights. To build a majority in today’s America, one must embrace voter choice.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Imperative for Faith-Informed Response

Someone reading a sermon.

Pexels, Pavel Danilyuk

The Imperative for Faith-Informed Response

In the early days of this second Trump presidency, I'm reminded that religious leaders often speak of hope, but now we must do so with urgency and clarity. What we're witnessing isn't just political transition—it's moral regression dressed in the garments of restoration.

When a president speaks of a "golden age" on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we must name the idolatry in such rhetoric. Golden ages, historically, have always been golden for some at the expense of many. Dr. King didn't dream of a return to any past era; he envisioned a future yet unrealized.

Keep ReadingShow less