Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bipartisan efforts increasing among elected officials

Rep. Susie Lee

Rep. Susie Lee of Nevada was one of four members of Congress to achieve perfect marks in the latest update to the Common Ground Scorecard.

The Washington Post/Getty Images

Meyers is executive editor of The Fulcrum.

While much of the political discourse revolves around the nation being hopelessly divided, there are a number of politicians who are working across the aisle. To help voters identify such people, the Common Ground Committee measures elected officials and candidates on their bipartisan efforts. The Common Ground Scorecard was recently updated in advance of the 2024 elections — and includes some record numbers.


The scorecard measures individuals across broad categories that include official actions, public statements and promises for future behavior. For the first time, someone achieved a perfect score in the 2024 report. In fact, four people earned 110 out of 110 points: Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), Rep. Don Davis (D-N.C.), Sen. Maggie Hasson (D-Nev.) and Rep. Susie Lee (D-Nev.). Coincidentally, Bacon, Davis and Lee were all recently named finalists for Democracy Awards, given out by the Congressional Management Foundation for outstanding public service on Capitol Hill.

“Hardworking families in southern Nevada care less about political parties and more about common sense solutions. That’s why I’ve worked with Republicans to lower costs, create jobs, support law enforcement and keep Americans safe at home and abroad,” said Lee. “I’m proud to have been named the most bipartisan member of Congress and I will continue working with my Republican colleagues to help Nevada’s families, small businesses, seniors and veterans.”

This year, there was a 53 percent increase in the number of people earning the title of “champion” for reaching the highest tier of scores, jumping from 34 in 2023 to 52.

“Legislation requires cooperation just to get out of committees in Congress and be considered for a vote. That means partisanship gets in the way of finding solutions to the significant issues facing our nation,” said Erik Olsen, co-founder and CEO of Common Ground Committee.

The average score across House members, governors and presidential candidates is 31, up 3 points from the previous update and up 6 points (25 percent) from the scorecard’s launch in 2020.

“This small increase is a sign we are moving in the right direction, but there is still a long way to go,” Olsen said.

Among the ways people earn points are: supporting bipartisan legislation (as measured by the Lugar Center’s Bipartisan Index), demonstrating bipartisan job approval ratings, having public conversations or events with someone from the opposite party, being a members in any of a selection of across-the-aisle congressional caucuses, promoting common ground in public communications (and losing points for derogatory or violent language) and affirming a series of common ground commitments developed by the CGC.

Individuals can earn 10 bonus points for “a bold, exceptional act championing common ground.” This can include leading the way on bipartisan legislation, writing a bipartisan op-ed or winning an award for common ground efforts.

Since April 2023, a number of individuals have made huge jumps in their scores.

Leading the way is Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), who increased 83 points to a total of 100. Rep. Eric Sorensen (D-Ill.) saw his score increase 77 points to 84. Nine others earned increases of at least 50 points. Both Lawler and Sorenson increased their scores by doing more bipartisan legislating, affirming the CGC’s “Common Grounder Commitments,” joining a bipartisan caucus, engaging in public events with someone from the other party, writing an op-ed with someone from the other party and speaking publicly about finding common ground.

According to Olsen, more and more members of Congress have engaged with the Common Ground Committee and sought ways to improve their scores.

“We have had a significant increase in the number of members and staff reaching out to us to discuss how to increase their scores and send us information about their bipartisan activities,” he said. “Sometimes, this will impact scores, and sometimes, it will not. But there is a clear interest among certain members in working towards bipartisanship.”

For example, over the past year CGC saw a 39 percent increase in the number of people agreeing to the Common Ground Commitments, which are:

I will identify and set aside personal biases.
I will commit to seek agreement, progress, and solutions.
I will listen first to learn perspectives and experiences.
I will not assume, but seek to understand motives and intentions.
I will seek outcomes all can live with but not compromise principles.
I will accept that good people may disagree.
I will use and accept facts.
I will stay respectful.
I will resist demonizing.
I will de-escalate hostile situations.

The scorecard also measures how the presidential candidates perform. President Joe Biden’s score has held steady at 30 since January 2023, when it fell from a personal high of 45. His score is based on positive talk about finding common ground and winning an award for civility in public life from Allegheny College. Donald Trump’s score has never budged from the lowest end of the scale: negative 20 points, based on his insults and crude descriptions of his political opponents. Neither Biden nor Trump received any points — positive or negative — in other categories.

In addition to Trump, nine others were given negative scores, including Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Rep. Federica Wilson (D-Fla.), who all matched the former president’s negative 20 score.


Read More

How Composting Connected Two Women Across Six Decades

An 82-year-old and 24-year-old bonded over composting—and discovered shared roots, values, and a friendship that broke every generational stereotype.e

Cavan Images/Getty Images

How Composting Connected Two Women Across Six Decades

Every day, we cross paths with people whose lives seem completely different from our own. We exchange polite greetings with neighbors, chat briefly with acquaintances, and pass strangers without ever learning their stories. Yet beneath the surface, we often share more than we realize. Sometimes, all it takes is one conversation. Jean and Bella, 82 and 24 respectively, discovered this through their interest in composting.

Bella regularly attended a Sunday morning "Cookies and Conversation" intergenerational discussion group at Hebrew SeniorLife, where Jean lives in Brookline, MA. The two had spoken before, but only in passing. Like many people meeting someone from a different generation, Bella wasn't always sure how to bridge the gap.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cropped shot of a group of people joining their hands in solidarity

A new union political director explains why labor membership has halved since 1983 even as public approval hits record highs—and what's driving the gap.

LumiNola/Getty Images

The Ongoing Fight for Bread and Roses

Last Monday, I started a new job as the political director for IBEW 569, a local electrical workers' union based here in San Diego. In talking to friends about what I’m doing–while learning, fast, in real time, how to do the job myself–it occurred to me that there’s actually quite a knowledge gap in society today regarding an understanding of what unions are and what they’re supposed to do. So let’s get into it.

A union is, at its core, a group of workers who agree to negotiate together instead of alone. One worker asking a boss for a raise has almost no leverage. A thousand workers asking together hits different. That leverage of teamwork, that collective bargaining, is how the overtime pay, workplace safety standards, and employer-sponsored health insurance all came to exist in this country. None of it was handed down out of corporate goodwill. Fair wages (bread) and dignity (roses) were won, often at real cost. In 1890, the average workweek for manufacturing employees and building tradesmen was around 100 hours or more. Workers in Chicago who rallied for an eight-hour workday faced police violence, but we have that and weekends now because people were willing to lose their jobs, and sometimes their lives, to organize for it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Group of young adult students sit at desks in classroom listening to teacher

Why do Americans respond so differently to hard history lessons? A look at the three psychological mindsets driving the patriotism debate — and a path past it.

Lighthouse Films/Getty Images

“They Hate America”: Patriotism in the Face of Historical Updates

I happened upon a civil discussion blog and read a post by a man who said he was happy to report that when he attended a panel discussion about teaching patriotism in the schools, all went well. He said that’s because most of the people in the bridging organization that hosted the event are “pretty patriotic.” He clarified that by writing, “None of the type of bad actors (and there are many) who want to teach kids to hate America and Western Civilization were represented.”

Someone made a comment about why we can’t incorporate historical change into curriculum and objected to the notion that a segment of the population wants to teach kids to hate America. The man who posted cited what he believes is proof. A last commenter simply input the emoji for a sleeping person, as though the argument was boring or unimportant.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Utah Governor Spencer Cox

Utah Governor Spencer Cox

Getty Images

Spencer Cox’s Off Ramp and Utah’s Tradition of Bipartisan Leadership

Utah has long impressed me as a place where governors take bipartisan leadership seriously, and my own experience confirms it. I first saw this more than a decade ago when I met former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman through No Labels. In January 2013, Huntsman, then a Republican, joined Democrat Joe Manchin as national co‑chairs of the organization, a partnership built on the belief that durable solutions require leaders willing to cross the aisle. Working with both of them during that period left a lasting impression on me. Their partnership embodied a simple but powerful truth: when leaders choose cooperation over contempt, they expand what’s possible for the country. Huntsman and Manchin worked deliberately to model cross‑partisan problem‑solving—demonstrating that principled disagreement can coexist with shared purpose.

That experience left a lasting impression on me, and it’s one reason Governor Spencer Cox’s new book Off Ramp: How to Be a Peacemaker in an Age of Contempt resonates so strongly with me today.

Keep ReadingShow less