Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Here's to life: Remembering Bruce Bond

News

Bruce Bond of the Common Ground Committee

Bruce Bond (left) co-founded the Common Ground Committee with Erik Olsen.

Courtesy Common Ground Committee

The entire staff of The Fulcrum is saddened to learn of the passing of Bruce Bond, CEO of Bridge Alliance member Common Ground Committee, on Dec. 27.

Seven years ago Bruce Bond, Erik Olsen and a group of concerned citizens from New York and Connecticut were brought together by their common desire to improve the tenor of public discourse on topics of concern in our country and the world. While the idea for the Common Ground Committee had been bandied about between Bruce and Erik for years, it was this group of friends that formed the Common Ground Committee. Bruce served as CEO and board chairman, then went on to network and lead in the larger bridging movement.


Bruce was a true visionary, believing that people of goodwill can and must engage in constructive dialogue about the many challenges facing our country and society today. Bruce and Erik’s friendship enjoyed vigorous debates about politics, economics, current events and music. On a joint family vacation in 2009, while bemoaning the angry tenor of public discourse, they conceived of the need for public forums and other discussions where prominent figures from opposing ends of the political spectrum could reveal their shared areas of agreement on polarized policy issues. This was the seed that became CGC with support from their friends.

Bruce had an impressive business career before co-founding Common Ground Committee but when asked in an interview with The Fulcrum in February 2020 what his biggest professional triumph was, he did not hesitate to discuss his bridging work:

"Nothing in my career has been more satisfying than obtaining the recognition, funding and personnel that enabled Common Ground Committee to move from a bootstrapped, volunteer-only startup to a strong, growing and talent-rich organization."

In a stroke of genius and generosity, Bruce and the CGC team developed the Common Ground Scorecard, to provide a way for citizens to see, with a single score, how effectively their elected officials and candidates for office embody the spirit and practice of a Common Grounder. Or not. In meetings on Capitol Hill, members of Congress became concerned when their CGC scores were low and what that meant for them. The scorecard does not assess issue positions, ideology or any other qualifications.

This tool is just one example of the many groundbreaking projects Bruce and Erik pioneered. Together they have produced over 60 podcasts, titled “Let’s Find Common Ground,” that explore the path to more progress and less division, working with journalists, top thought leaders and voices from all sides of the political spectrum.

Donna Brazile, ABC News contributor and former chair of the Democratic National Committee participated in a CGC event and a later podcast with former Republican National Committee Chair Michael Steele. She spoke about the work of the Common Ground Committee:

"Our two-party system is caught in an endless loop to win voters, but not build up our ability to find common ground. That is, we are in an unending loop where each side regards the other as an inherently hostile opponent who is unfit to govern the country, or even to be considered American. The Common Ground Committee stands almost alone in the public forum to emphasize the values this nation is founded upon: equality, the rule of law, equal opportunity, a government of, by, and for the People. We must change the focus of the public mind from dwelling on hostile, exclusionary divisions to focusing on the common values and virtues that unite us. I don't know of any work underway for the future of this country that is more important than that of the Common Ground Committee.”

Learn more about Bruce’s philosophy and strategy in his discussion with Toby Davis for the UnityNow podcast.

A graduate of Princeton University, Bruce was a business leader with over 30 years of experience in the information technology industry, including an executive position at the world-renowned analyst firm Gartner. He launched several successful software startups, in addition to his roles as industry analyst, software developer and chief information officer.

Bruce could have retired and enjoyed a life of leisure but instead devoted himself to bridging the divides that have created such animosity in American society. He believed that civically engaged citizens working hard together can heal the incivility and polarization that is dividing our nation.

Bruce’s leadership as a healer and uniter will be sorely missed.

The family has asked that in lieu of flowers, contributions be made to the Common Ground Committee. You can do this by texting CGC to 53-555. Or you can visit the website www.commongroundcommittee.org.

Read More

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less