Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Here's to life: Remembering Bruce Bond

News

Bruce Bond of the Common Ground Committee

Bruce Bond (left) co-founded the Common Ground Committee with Erik Olsen.

Courtesy Common Ground Committee

The entire staff of The Fulcrum is saddened to learn of the passing of Bruce Bond, CEO of Bridge Alliance member Common Ground Committee, on Dec. 27.

Seven years ago Bruce Bond, Erik Olsen and a group of concerned citizens from New York and Connecticut were brought together by their common desire to improve the tenor of public discourse on topics of concern in our country and the world. While the idea for the Common Ground Committee had been bandied about between Bruce and Erik for years, it was this group of friends that formed the Common Ground Committee. Bruce served as CEO and board chairman, then went on to network and lead in the larger bridging movement.


Bruce was a true visionary, believing that people of goodwill can and must engage in constructive dialogue about the many challenges facing our country and society today. Bruce and Erik’s friendship enjoyed vigorous debates about politics, economics, current events and music. On a joint family vacation in 2009, while bemoaning the angry tenor of public discourse, they conceived of the need for public forums and other discussions where prominent figures from opposing ends of the political spectrum could reveal their shared areas of agreement on polarized policy issues. This was the seed that became CGC with support from their friends.

Bruce had an impressive business career before co-founding Common Ground Committee but when asked in an interview with The Fulcrum in February 2020 what his biggest professional triumph was, he did not hesitate to discuss his bridging work:

"Nothing in my career has been more satisfying than obtaining the recognition, funding and personnel that enabled Common Ground Committee to move from a bootstrapped, volunteer-only startup to a strong, growing and talent-rich organization."

In a stroke of genius and generosity, Bruce and the CGC team developed the Common Ground Scorecard, to provide a way for citizens to see, with a single score, how effectively their elected officials and candidates for office embody the spirit and practice of a Common Grounder. Or not. In meetings on Capitol Hill, members of Congress became concerned when their CGC scores were low and what that meant for them. The scorecard does not assess issue positions, ideology or any other qualifications.

This tool is just one example of the many groundbreaking projects Bruce and Erik pioneered. Together they have produced over 60 podcasts, titled “Let’s Find Common Ground,” that explore the path to more progress and less division, working with journalists, top thought leaders and voices from all sides of the political spectrum.

Donna Brazile, ABC News contributor and former chair of the Democratic National Committee participated in a CGC event and a later podcast with former Republican National Committee Chair Michael Steele. She spoke about the work of the Common Ground Committee:

"Our two-party system is caught in an endless loop to win voters, but not build up our ability to find common ground. That is, we are in an unending loop where each side regards the other as an inherently hostile opponent who is unfit to govern the country, or even to be considered American. The Common Ground Committee stands almost alone in the public forum to emphasize the values this nation is founded upon: equality, the rule of law, equal opportunity, a government of, by, and for the People. We must change the focus of the public mind from dwelling on hostile, exclusionary divisions to focusing on the common values and virtues that unite us. I don't know of any work underway for the future of this country that is more important than that of the Common Ground Committee.”

Learn more about Bruce’s philosophy and strategy in his discussion with Toby Davis for the UnityNow podcast.

A graduate of Princeton University, Bruce was a business leader with over 30 years of experience in the information technology industry, including an executive position at the world-renowned analyst firm Gartner. He launched several successful software startups, in addition to his roles as industry analyst, software developer and chief information officer.

Bruce could have retired and enjoyed a life of leisure but instead devoted himself to bridging the divides that have created such animosity in American society. He believed that civically engaged citizens working hard together can heal the incivility and polarization that is dividing our nation.

Bruce’s leadership as a healer and uniter will be sorely missed.

The family has asked that in lieu of flowers, contributions be made to the Common Ground Committee. You can do this by texting CGC to 53-555. Or you can visit the website www.commongroundcommittee.org.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less