Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Meet the reformers: Bruce Bond and Erik Olsen, buddies who argued until they hit on a common idea

Bruce Bond and Erik Olsen, Common Ground Committee

Bruce Bond (left) and Erik Olsen at their headquarters in Wilton, Conn.

Common Ground Committee

Bruce Bond and Erik Olsen have been friends since middle school in New Canaan, a tony Connecticut suburb of New York, where they indulged their shared passion for debating politics, economics and other current events. Bond was a distance runner at Princeton and then spent 30 years as an information technology entrepreneur, software developer and industry analyst. Olsen went to Principia College and got an MBA from UCLA before launching his career in investment management, fund management and real estate investment.

On a joint family vacation in 2009, while bemoaning the angry tenor of public discourse, they landed on the concept for their organization. Common Ground Committee's main work is hosting public forums where prominent figures from opposing ends of the political spectrum reveal their shared areas of agreement on an often polarizing public policy issue. Their answers have been edited for clarity and length.

What's democracy's biggest challenge, in 10 words or less?

Both: The inability of elected officials to overcome emotion with reason.


Describe your very first civic engagements.

Bond: It was in seventh grade. I had recently become interested in environmental issues and volunteered to be the student leader and organizer on my town's "Clean Your Mile Day" committee.

Olsen: When my children were younger, we worked at a homeless shelter during Christmas through an activity organized by member of our church in California. I've been active in church since my teens.

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Bond: Nothing in my career has been more satisfying than obtaining the recognition, funding and personnel that enabled Common Ground Committee to move from a bootstrapped, volunteer-only startup to a strong, growing and talent-rich organization.

Olsen: I've been self-employed in small businesses since 1986, which in itself is a professional triumph. But I must echo Bruce, who deserves most of the credit, that getting CGC to its current level of operations has been quite an achievement.

And your most disappointing setback?

Bond: While working for a tech start-up, the company was purchased by a larger firm. I had been assured I would be able to benefit greatly should that happen. But the founders had decided behind closed doors that the spoils of a buyout would not be shared by non-owners. It was very disappointing, but it was my fault for not getting something in writing when I joined the firm.

Olsen: Not being able to stabilize the business I developed with two partners in 2014. Everyone we talked with thought we had a great idea, including prospective clients. But we could not get enough to sign on the dotted line.

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

Bond: My identity has a lot to do with a "no limits" mindset and putting a high value on inclusion and teamwork. From what I know about the democracy reform movement, both are crucial if we are ever to bring healing to the problems of incivility and polarization in the nation's politics.

Olsen: At Common Ground Committee I'm influenced by my desire to find truth. It leads me to constantly question things. But I've come to realize that my sense of truth is not necessarily shared by others.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

Bond: My favorite advice was from my dad the day before my wedding: "Remember that what's yours is hers, and what's hers is hers." But the best advice was really from a teacher and mentor who instilled in me the value of listening for direction — particularly from the "voice within."

Olsen: Don't make decisions based on fear.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Bond: I'm confident they would have a best seller in Common Grounder Swirl, a mix of vanilla and chocolate ice cream ribbons.

Olsen:Maybe a blueberry and raspberry swirl. With nuts.

"West Wing" or "Veep"?

Bond: Neither one. I prefer "24" and the Jack Bauer relationship with the president. President David Palmer had it going on!

Olsen: "West Wing." If it were only that easy. And clear.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

Bond: After plugging in the phone to recharge overnight, I take my iPad to bed and will often turn out the light and listen to a recorded article using a soft headband with wireless speakers in it. Works every time.

Olsen: Set the timer to shut off the podcast I'm listening to after 15 minutes.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

Bond: I went to my high school senior prom with the 13th girl I asked. The first 12 politely declined. Very humiliating.

Olsen: I would prefer a romantic old movie to any sporting event — except possibly the Super Bowl, if there is a party.

Read More

elementary school classroom
Urgent action is needed for our beloved public schools to renew civic life, writes Goodwin.
skynesher/Getty Images

Teach Leveraging in Middle and High School To Promote Democracy

It's all about leverage. You hear this from a lot of people. Thomas Friedman said it years ago in one of his Sunday New York Times columns on foreign policy. He was referring to international relations. In particular, he was talking about bargaining leverage, namely the kind of leverage that is needed to motivate an ally or an opponent to change their course of action, whether it concerns trade, military build-up, or political alignments.

People in business, especially sophisticated big business, talk about leverage all the time. Gary Hamel and C. K. Prahalad wrote a chapter in their famous book, Competing for the Future, that was all about leverage, although the concept of leverage they were talking about was resource leverage, not bargaining leverage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

If approved, the Democracy Voucher program would bring in $4.5 million each year through a property tax.

Road Red Runner/Adobe Stock

Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

A public funding mechanism for Seattle elections is up for renewal in next week's election.

The Democracy Voucher program was passed 10 years ago. It offers voters four $25 vouchers to use each election cycle for candidates who accept certain fundraising and spending limits. Supporters said it is a model for more inclusive democracy, touting higher turnout, increased participation from more small donors and a more diverse candidate field.

Spencer Olson, spokesperson for the group People Powered Elections Seattle, which supports Proposition 1, said the program helps level the playing field.

"It's really important that people's voices are heard and that candidates can run being supported by their constituents," Olson contended. "Versus just listening to those wealthiest donors, those special interests that have historically been the loudest voices at the table and really dominated what priorities rise to the top."

The voucher is supported by a property tax. Olson and other supporters hope to bring the model statewide. Critics said the program is not big enough to make a difference in elections and has not curbed outside spending. Ballots are due by 8 p.m. Tuesday.

Olson pointed out the vouchers have succeeded in encouraging more diverse participation in local elections.

"The intention of the program was to bring a public financing program to Seattle elections to help empower more candidates -- more diverse candidates, women, renters, people of color -- to have equal access to be able to run, and run competitive elections without having to rely on wealthy donors, special interests," Olson emphasized.

Olson noted because the money comes from a dedicated tax levy, unused vouchers roll over to the next election.

"The goal isn't to create an unlimited pot of money but to be able to provide resources for candidates to run with the community's support," Olson stressed. "But it's not a blank check at the same time."

Eric Tegethoff is a journalist covering the Northwest for Public News Service.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi
- YouTube

Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's interview series engages diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This initiative is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

The latest interview in this series features Rahmin Sarabi, founder and Director of the American Public Trust, an organization dedicated to promoting and implementing deliberative democracy practices, such as citizen assemblies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”

President Donald Trump finally acknowledged there is “real starvation” in Gaza—a reality that has generated momentum among holdout countries to recognize a State of Palestine, as 147 of 193 U.N. members have already done. Trump claims that this impermissibly “rewards Hamas.” Concerns about the optics of “rewarding” a militant group that is not the country’s government should not drive the decision to recognize Palestine as a state or the decision to maintain diplomatic relations with its government.

Countries that have already recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and the fact that the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) forms a defined geographic area with a government and a population—the traditional criteria for statehood. Countries that have not recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) lack of effective control over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and to the idea that recognition can be used as future diplomatic leverage. But waiting to recognize a state of Palestine until after there is a negotiated agreement between Israel and the PA is an outdated position that amounts to “kicking the can” down an interminable road.

Keep ReadingShow less