Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Are Americans democracy hypocrites?

U.S. Capitol with red and blue clouds
Andrey Denisyuk/Getty Images

In the latest episode of the “Politics in Question” podcast, Lee Drutman and Wallner James talk about Bonnie Tyler, Tina Turner and Americans' views of democracy. What is democracy? How do Americans view it? Do they think about democracy differently when it gets in their way? Does that make them "democracy hypocrites"? Why are Americans holding out for a hero in such moments? And does democratic self-government need another hero to make it work? These are some of the questions Lee and James ask.

The episode delves into the evolving dynamics of American politics, particularly focusing on the shifting attitudes towards democracy. The conversation touches on the polarization seen among Donald Trump’s supporters and the challenges arising when political leaders advocate actions that seemingly undermine democratic principles.


The speakers explore the concept that Americans are increasingly less interested in engaging in politics as a space for open debate and more inclined towards a desire for certainty and control. They discuss whether that shift in mindset is detrimental to democracy, as certainty becomes the enemy of democratic processes. The podcast emphasizes the need to make room for uncertainty, highlighting the importance of allowing individuals to be unsure, change their minds and engage in open discussions without seeking absolute certainty.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The conversation expands to discuss the role of democracy and the potential threats posed by an overwhelming focus on winning rather than engaging in meaningful, multidimensional and multiparty politics. The speakers argue for breaking the two-party system, advocating for a more nuanced and flexible political landscape that goes beyond a quest for a permanent majority.

They also call for a shift in perspective on American democracy, moving away from an attempt to fix it as if it were a problem and instead recognizing it as a dynamic space that requires multidimensional and multiparty engagement.

Read More

Older woman speaking with another woman

Listen for values and emotions, not just points you can rebut with facts.

kupicoo/Getty Images

Vaccines and values: When you’re having a tough conversation about medicine, don’t just pile on evidence − listen to someone’s ‘moral foundations’

It’s that special time of year when family and friends come together to celebrate the holidays, share meals, spread cheer – and, too often, pass along their germs.

Because vaccines can save lives and prevent serious illness, health professionals have long recommended vaccinations for influenza, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. Yet despite these apparent benefits, many people decline.

Keep ReadingShow less
civic education notebook

We need to increase emphasis on schools as a more effective location for teaching interpersonal civil discourse.

Zhanna Hapanovich/Getty Images

4 S’s showcase how dialogue fits and where other approaches work best

In my previous article, I explained the “4 R’s” that should cause people to reconsider the extremely strong emphasis on civil discourse in efforts to reduce political divides in the United States. I also promised suggestions for how to use dialogue most effectively, in specific circumstances, and when non-dialogue approaches may be best.

A brief overview of the 4 R’s to reconsider such a heavy focus on dialogue reminds us that it is difficult to get many people to attend events (recruitment), civil discourse is not inherently effective (reliability), even a successful 1:1 interaction may not generalize to the entire out-party (representativeness) and getting people to repeatedly use skills learned is challenging (repetition).

Keep ReadingShow less
Caucasian business people talking on bench outdoors

Civil discourse can be effective, but its effectiveness is limited.

Jetta Productions Inc./Getty Images

The 4 R’s reduce dialogue workshop effectiveness – but don’t despair

In some circles, reducing political divides and civil discourse are almost synonymous. I’ve had conversations where I mention that I work on reducing these divides, only to have the other person launch into some story or opinion about civil discourse.

By “civil discourse,” I mean an interpersonal focus on communication, which can include activities like dialogue or certain types of debates.

Keep ReadingShow less
city skyline

Reading, Pennsylvania, can be a model for a path forward.

arlutz73/Getty Images

The election couldn’t solve our crisis of belief. Here’s what can.

The stark divisions surrounding the recent presidential election are still with us, and will be for some time. The reason is clear: We have a crisis of belief in this country that goes much deeper than any single election.

So many people, especially young people, have lost faith in America. We have lost belief in our leaders, institutions and systems. Even in one another. Recent years have seen us roiled by debates over racial injustice, fatigued by wars, troubled by growing inequities and disparities, and worried about the very health of our democracy. We are awash in manufactured polarization, hatred and bigotry, mistrust, and a lack of hope.

Keep ReadingShow less