Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

A firefighter on duty.

Photo by Spencer Davis on Unsplash.

Originally published by Independent Voters News.

Though we come from opposite coasts, we share a painful reality that many Americans know all too well: our communities have been devastated by disaster. One of us lives in California, where historic wildfires have ravaged coastal cities - destroying thousands of homes and businesses, displacing tens of thousands of people, and claiming more than two dozen lives. The other lives in Augusta, Georgia, where Hurricane Helene recently caused widespread destruction by knocking down homes, wiping out farms, and taking hundreds of lives.


The subsequent days and months following these disasters are trying on our families, friends and neighbors who must pick up the pieces. Yet, they also reveal a hopeful truth that we rarely recognize in our current polarized environment – our shared humanity can endure if we are willing to extend our empathy across our differences.

We’ve witnessed this over the past few weeks as support poured in from first responders, frontline workers, and volunteers from across cities, states, and even countries. Firefighters rescued cherished photo albums from a burning home, people flooded donation centers with food, clothing, cash and the bare essentials; businesses opened their doors to displaced residents, and journalists rescued pets as homes turned to rubble.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

This outpouring of support is not unique to California. After Hurricane Helene, we saw similar acts of kindness. In Augusta alone, a displaced resident invited FEMA workers to her rental home for Thanksgiving dinner and our community organized an event to honor those who went above and beyond to help.

While these moments of compassion and empathy give us hope that we can come together for the greater good, it also displays the growing difficulty in extending empathy to those we don’t understand or who are outside our immediate circle.

Studies show that people often perceive empathy as emotionally draining and costly, leading us to direct it only toward those we can relate to. This "empathy gap" is particularly apparent in our increasingly polarized country. Take, for example, the response to the loss of homes in wealthy neighborhoods. While many offered heartfelt messages of support, others struggled to empathize with people from affluent areas, seeing their loss through a lens of privilege.

Meanwhile, the devastation in historically Black and Latino communities were met with silence. These neighborhoods lost not only homes but also generations of cultural heritage, wealth, and employment opportunities. Despite extensive news coverage, their struggles barely capture the public’s attention, overshadowed by the constant churn of the 24-hour news cycle.

In many ways, this mirrors the broader experience of minority communities: while we all share dreams and joys, our struggles often fail to resonate beyond our own circles.

Many communities are a melting pot of ideological, geographical, and socioeconomic diversity, each with its unique problems. Yet, at its core, the loss of homes — no matter the community — is a shared loss. The pain of losing a family home filled with memories, security, and stability affects everyone.

If we fail to understand others’ experiences, we risk losing sight of their pain. This can lead to divisiveness and blame games that distract from joining hands across lines of difference to serve the greater good of our communities. In California, our divisive nature quickly fueled misinformation and conspiracy theories that spread faster than the fires themselves, while similar tactics on the East Coast hindered FEMA’s ability to aid struggling communities.

In both cases, leaders and the public were forced to divert attention from relief efforts to debunk false claims. We must stop playing into the partisan blame game that furthers the agenda of a few and replace it with constructive conversations for the sake of helping people and communities in need.

As we inevitably face more challenges ahead, we must realize that most Americans want to come together across our differences to solve our toughest problems together, but to build a stronger country for all, we must work harder to extend empathy beyond those we relate to or understand. We must hold onto these truths even when the smoke clears.

Read More

a group of people arranged in the shape of the United states of America map

A group of people arranged in the shape of the United states of America map.

Getty Images, attjeacock

Where Is the “Real America”?

Is there such a thing as a “real America”? A battle now rages over this simple question. Some Democratic party operatives claim the real America are so-called “Trump voters,” who they say they need to better “study” in order to win future elections. Many Republican voices argue the real America are just those who support the new administration 100% of the time. Still, others assert that different demographics or geography comprise the real America. It’s as if the real America is one particular slice or another of our nation.

These caricatures lead us sorely astray. But there is a real America. I work in it every day.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘When People Spend Time Together, They Are Less Inclined To See Each Other As the Enemy’: ​A Conversation With Matt Grossmann

Picture of Matt Grossmann

‘When People Spend Time Together, They Are Less Inclined To See Each Other As the Enemy’: ​A Conversation With Matt Grossmann

In The Sun Also Rises, Ernest Hemingway famously observed that a character went broke in two ways: gradually, then suddenly. The same dynamic has been at work in American politics. For decades, the composition of our principal political parties has been slowly shifting, without a great deal of public attention. And then the 2024 presidential election happened, and it was suddenly obvious: the Democrats, traditionally the party of the working class, had become the party of educated elites.

Matt Grossmann has been a keen observer of this transition. A professor of political science at Michigan State University, Grossmann also directs the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research and hosts the “Science of Politics” podcast for the Niskanen Center. With his co-author David A. Hopkins, Grossmann recently published Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics, a book that documents a remarkable shift in American society. Since 1960, we have seen a massive expansion in the number of adult Americans earning college degrees—from roughly 7 percent of the population to nearly 40 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Drain—More Than Fight—Authoritarianism and Censorship
Getty Images, Mykyta Ivanov

Drain—More Than Fight—Authoritarianism and Censorship

The current approaches to proactively counteracting authoritarianism and censorship fall into two main categories, which we call “fighting” and “Constitution-defending.” While Constitution-defending in particular has some value, this article advocates for a third major method: draining interest in authoritarianism and censorship.

“Draining” refers to sapping interest in these extreme possibilities of authoritarianism and censorship. In practical terms, it comes from reducing an overblown sense of threat of fellow Americans across the political spectrum. When there is less to fear about each other, there is less desire for authoritarianism or censorship.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Moral Awakening of Cory Booker's Marathon Speech
Cory Booker | U.S. Senator Cory Booker speaking with attende… | Flickr
www.flickr.com

The Moral Awakening of Cory Booker's Marathon Speech

Just when prophetic witness felt muted by political expediency, Senator Cory Booker's unprecedented 25-hour marathon speech on the Senate floor is a powerful testament to moral courage and democratic resilience. Beginning at 7 p.m. on Monday (3/31/25) and extending through Tuesday (4/1/25) evening, Booker's historic address surpassed Strom Thurmond's infamous 1957 record, though with a profound difference, reconstituting the meaning of a "moral moment."

The New Jersey senator's sustained oratory wasn't merely a political gesture—it embodied the prophetic tradition that has long animated America's moral progress. Like the Hebrew prophets who stood before kings, speaking truth to power at high personal cost, Booker's political discourse represented a contemporary form of bearing witness. His physical endurance became a metaphor for the sustained resistance required in facing injustice.

Keep ReadingShow less