Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

Opinion

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

A firefighter on duty.

Photo by Spencer Davis on Unsplash.

Originally published by Independent Voters News.

Though we come from opposite coasts, we share a painful reality that many Americans know all too well: our communities have been devastated by disaster. One of us lives in California, where historic wildfires have ravaged coastal cities - destroying thousands of homes and businesses, displacing tens of thousands of people, and claiming more than two dozen lives. The other lives in Augusta, Georgia, where Hurricane Helene recently caused widespread destruction by knocking down homes, wiping out farms, and taking hundreds of lives.


The subsequent days and months following these disasters are trying on our families, friends and neighbors who must pick up the pieces. Yet, they also reveal a hopeful truth that we rarely recognize in our current polarized environment – our shared humanity can endure if we are willing to extend our empathy across our differences.

We’ve witnessed this over the past few weeks as support poured in from first responders, frontline workers, and volunteers from across cities, states, and even countries. Firefighters rescued cherished photo albums from a burning home, people flooded donation centers with food, clothing, cash and the bare essentials; businesses opened their doors to displaced residents, and journalists rescued pets as homes turned to rubble.

This outpouring of support is not unique to California. After Hurricane Helene, we saw similar acts of kindness. In Augusta alone, a displaced resident invited FEMA workers to her rental home for Thanksgiving dinner and our community organized an event to honor those who went above and beyond to help.

While these moments of compassion and empathy give us hope that we can come together for the greater good, it also displays the growing difficulty in extending empathy to those we don’t understand or who are outside our immediate circle.

Studies show that people often perceive empathy as emotionally draining and costly, leading us to direct it only toward those we can relate to. This "empathy gap" is particularly apparent in our increasingly polarized country. Take, for example, the response to the loss of homes in wealthy neighborhoods. While many offered heartfelt messages of support, others struggled to empathize with people from affluent areas, seeing their loss through a lens of privilege.

Meanwhile, the devastation in historically Black and Latino communities were met with silence. These neighborhoods lost not only homes but also generations of cultural heritage, wealth, and employment opportunities. Despite extensive news coverage, their struggles barely capture the public’s attention, overshadowed by the constant churn of the 24-hour news cycle.

In many ways, this mirrors the broader experience of minority communities: while we all share dreams and joys, our struggles often fail to resonate beyond our own circles.

Many communities are a melting pot of ideological, geographical, and socioeconomic diversity, each with its unique problems. Yet, at its core, the loss of homes — no matter the community — is a shared loss. The pain of losing a family home filled with memories, security, and stability affects everyone.

If we fail to understand others’ experiences, we risk losing sight of their pain. This can lead to divisiveness and blame games that distract from joining hands across lines of difference to serve the greater good of our communities. In California, our divisive nature quickly fueled misinformation and conspiracy theories that spread faster than the fires themselves, while similar tactics on the East Coast hindered FEMA’s ability to aid struggling communities.

In both cases, leaders and the public were forced to divert attention from relief efforts to debunk false claims. We must stop playing into the partisan blame game that furthers the agenda of a few and replace it with constructive conversations for the sake of helping people and communities in need.

As we inevitably face more challenges ahead, we must realize that most Americans want to come together across our differences to solve our toughest problems together, but to build a stronger country for all, we must work harder to extend empathy beyond those we relate to or understand. We must hold onto these truths even when the smoke clears.

Read More

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less