Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

A firefighter on duty.

Photo by Spencer Davis on Unsplash.

Originally published by Independent Voters News.

Though we come from opposite coasts, we share a painful reality that many Americans know all too well: our communities have been devastated by disaster. One of us lives in California, where historic wildfires have ravaged coastal cities - destroying thousands of homes and businesses, displacing tens of thousands of people, and claiming more than two dozen lives. The other lives in Augusta, Georgia, where Hurricane Helene recently caused widespread destruction by knocking down homes, wiping out farms, and taking hundreds of lives.


The subsequent days and months following these disasters are trying on our families, friends and neighbors who must pick up the pieces. Yet, they also reveal a hopeful truth that we rarely recognize in our current polarized environment – our shared humanity can endure if we are willing to extend our empathy across our differences.

We’ve witnessed this over the past few weeks as support poured in from first responders, frontline workers, and volunteers from across cities, states, and even countries. Firefighters rescued cherished photo albums from a burning home, people flooded donation centers with food, clothing, cash and the bare essentials; businesses opened their doors to displaced residents, and journalists rescued pets as homes turned to rubble.

This outpouring of support is not unique to California. After Hurricane Helene, we saw similar acts of kindness. In Augusta alone, a displaced resident invited FEMA workers to her rental home for Thanksgiving dinner and our community organized an event to honor those who went above and beyond to help.

While these moments of compassion and empathy give us hope that we can come together for the greater good, it also displays the growing difficulty in extending empathy to those we don’t understand or who are outside our immediate circle.

Studies show that people often perceive empathy as emotionally draining and costly, leading us to direct it only toward those we can relate to. This "empathy gap" is particularly apparent in our increasingly polarized country. Take, for example, the response to the loss of homes in wealthy neighborhoods. While many offered heartfelt messages of support, others struggled to empathize with people from affluent areas, seeing their loss through a lens of privilege.

Meanwhile, the devastation in historically Black and Latino communities were met with silence. These neighborhoods lost not only homes but also generations of cultural heritage, wealth, and employment opportunities. Despite extensive news coverage, their struggles barely capture the public’s attention, overshadowed by the constant churn of the 24-hour news cycle.

In many ways, this mirrors the broader experience of minority communities: while we all share dreams and joys, our struggles often fail to resonate beyond our own circles.

Many communities are a melting pot of ideological, geographical, and socioeconomic diversity, each with its unique problems. Yet, at its core, the loss of homes — no matter the community — is a shared loss. The pain of losing a family home filled with memories, security, and stability affects everyone.

If we fail to understand others’ experiences, we risk losing sight of their pain. This can lead to divisiveness and blame games that distract from joining hands across lines of difference to serve the greater good of our communities. In California, our divisive nature quickly fueled misinformation and conspiracy theories that spread faster than the fires themselves, while similar tactics on the East Coast hindered FEMA’s ability to aid struggling communities.

In both cases, leaders and the public were forced to divert attention from relief efforts to debunk false claims. We must stop playing into the partisan blame game that furthers the agenda of a few and replace it with constructive conversations for the sake of helping people and communities in need.

As we inevitably face more challenges ahead, we must realize that most Americans want to come together across our differences to solve our toughest problems together, but to build a stronger country for all, we must work harder to extend empathy beyond those we relate to or understand. We must hold onto these truths even when the smoke clears.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less