Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

Opinion

Natural Disasters Reveal the Truth About Our Shared Humanity

A firefighter on duty.

Photo by Spencer Davis on Unsplash.

Originally published by Independent Voters News.

Though we come from opposite coasts, we share a painful reality that many Americans know all too well: our communities have been devastated by disaster. One of us lives in California, where historic wildfires have ravaged coastal cities - destroying thousands of homes and businesses, displacing tens of thousands of people, and claiming more than two dozen lives. The other lives in Augusta, Georgia, where Hurricane Helene recently caused widespread destruction by knocking down homes, wiping out farms, and taking hundreds of lives.


The subsequent days and months following these disasters are trying on our families, friends and neighbors who must pick up the pieces. Yet, they also reveal a hopeful truth that we rarely recognize in our current polarized environment – our shared humanity can endure if we are willing to extend our empathy across our differences.

We’ve witnessed this over the past few weeks as support poured in from first responders, frontline workers, and volunteers from across cities, states, and even countries. Firefighters rescued cherished photo albums from a burning home, people flooded donation centers with food, clothing, cash and the bare essentials; businesses opened their doors to displaced residents, and journalists rescued pets as homes turned to rubble.

This outpouring of support is not unique to California. After Hurricane Helene, we saw similar acts of kindness. In Augusta alone, a displaced resident invited FEMA workers to her rental home for Thanksgiving dinner and our community organized an event to honor those who went above and beyond to help.

While these moments of compassion and empathy give us hope that we can come together for the greater good, it also displays the growing difficulty in extending empathy to those we don’t understand or who are outside our immediate circle.

Studies show that people often perceive empathy as emotionally draining and costly, leading us to direct it only toward those we can relate to. This "empathy gap" is particularly apparent in our increasingly polarized country. Take, for example, the response to the loss of homes in wealthy neighborhoods. While many offered heartfelt messages of support, others struggled to empathize with people from affluent areas, seeing their loss through a lens of privilege.

Meanwhile, the devastation in historically Black and Latino communities were met with silence. These neighborhoods lost not only homes but also generations of cultural heritage, wealth, and employment opportunities. Despite extensive news coverage, their struggles barely capture the public’s attention, overshadowed by the constant churn of the 24-hour news cycle.

In many ways, this mirrors the broader experience of minority communities: while we all share dreams and joys, our struggles often fail to resonate beyond our own circles.

Many communities are a melting pot of ideological, geographical, and socioeconomic diversity, each with its unique problems. Yet, at its core, the loss of homes — no matter the community — is a shared loss. The pain of losing a family home filled with memories, security, and stability affects everyone.

If we fail to understand others’ experiences, we risk losing sight of their pain. This can lead to divisiveness and blame games that distract from joining hands across lines of difference to serve the greater good of our communities. In California, our divisive nature quickly fueled misinformation and conspiracy theories that spread faster than the fires themselves, while similar tactics on the East Coast hindered FEMA’s ability to aid struggling communities.

In both cases, leaders and the public were forced to divert attention from relief efforts to debunk false claims. We must stop playing into the partisan blame game that furthers the agenda of a few and replace it with constructive conversations for the sake of helping people and communities in need.

As we inevitably face more challenges ahead, we must realize that most Americans want to come together across our differences to solve our toughest problems together, but to build a stronger country for all, we must work harder to extend empathy beyond those we relate to or understand. We must hold onto these truths even when the smoke clears.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less