Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment

Opinion

Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment

People reading in a religious setting.

Getty Images, Maskot

In a moment defined by fracture and division, a surprising development has emerged in America's religious landscape. The decades-long decline of Christianity is leveling off. According to new research from the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans identifying as Christian has stabilized at around 62%—a dramatic shift from previous trends that saw consistent year-over-year drops in religious affiliation. This "pause" in religious decline offers a unique opportunity to examine whether faith communities might help heal our nation's deep sociopolitical wounds.

The timing of this latest phenomenon could not be more apropos. As America grapples with unprecedented polarization and the fraying of civic bonds, religious institutions—despite their internal struggles—may be uniquely positioned to foster dialogue, understanding, and responsiveness across divides.


Research shows that spirituality remains resilient even as traditional religious participation wanes. A striking 86% of Americans believe that people have souls beyond their physical bodies, while 79% believe in something spiritual beyond the natural world. The emergence of a shared spiritual foundation, transcending political and denominational boundaries, offers a common grounding for meaningful dialogue. More intriguingly, younger Americans, while less traditionally religious, maintain strong spiritual sensibilities. Among adults aged 18-24, 82% believe in the existence of the soul—nearly matching their grandparents' generation. This spiritual continuity amid institutional change hints at possibilities for intergenerational bridge-building that could help ease sociopolitical tensions.

Religious communities remain among the few spaces where Americans of different political persuasions interact regularly. While political segregation increasingly defines our neighborhoods, workplaces, and social circles, houses of worship continue to bring together people across ideological lines—particularly in racially diverse congregations, which have grown significantly in

recent years. However, leveraging these opportunities requires religious institutions to embrace shifts in their approach to civic engagement:

  1. Faith communities must move beyond the polarizing rhetoric that is often characterized by religious political engagement. The data shows that religious Americans span the political spectrum, particularly across racial and ethnic lines. Spiritual leaders who acknowledge and celebrate this diversity, rather than advance partisan agendas, can help model healthy political dialogue.
  2. Religious institutions should focus on their unique capacity to foster what sociologist Robert Putnam calls "bridging social capital"—connections that link different communities. While many churches have become ideologically homogeneous, those that intentionally create spaces for cross-cultural and cross-political relationship building can help rebuild civic trust.
  3. Faith communities must engage rising generations on their terms, recognizing that spiritual seeking often looks different today than in previous eras. Young adults' strong spiritual inclinations and skepticism of institutions suggest an opportunity to reimagine religious communities that resonate with contemporary sensibilities while preserving ancient wisdom about human flourishing and social harmony.

Additional strategies might include:

  • Establishing interfaith and cross-ideological dialogue programs that bring together diverse congregations for relationship-building and standard action on shared concerns.
  • Creating intergenerational initiatives that pair spiritually-minded emergent leaders with "seasoned" religious practitioners in ways that enable mutual learning and understanding.
  • Cultivating new models of spiritual community that combine traditional practices with contemporary approaches to meaning-making and social engagement.
  • Training religious leaders in the art of facilitating difficult conversations across political and cultural divides.

Stabilizing America's religious landscape is crucial for reimagining faith's role in democracy. Despite their imperfections, religious institutions remain repositories of social capital and ethical wisdom that our fractured society desperately needs.

By embracing their potential as guides or facilitators in navigating contemporary realities, they can help weave our tattered civic fabric together. Such work will require humility and creativity from spiritual guides and facilitators of faith. We must remain open to skepticism while exchanging in good faith among all parties. When many traditional sources of social cohesion have eroded, the persistent spiritual longings revealed in this research—and the institutional networks that have historically nurtured them—may offer essential resources for rebuilding American democracy.

No one faithful institution or individual is charged with reversing secularization or restoring religious dominance. Instead, at best, such institutions and their disciples ought to channel spiritual energy toward healing our divisions and respecting plurality. In this light, the pause in religious decline is an invitation to reimagine how faith can serve the common good in an increasingly diverse society.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Two Yellow Speech Bubbles Overlapping Common Ground on Blue Background Front View.
A reflection on parenting, empathy, and communication in a divided world.
Getty Images, MirageC

Building Trust, One Conversation at a Time

In 2020, my friend and colleague Dr. Terrence Robinson died suddenly and unexpectedly of COVID. For five years, we had built a youth apprenticeship program together in Cleveland, raised more than half a million dollars, and trained more than 200 young people. Terrence was Black. I am Jewish. The whole time, I wanted to talk with him about the things that sat quietly underneath our friendship: race, religion, history, privilege. I never did, because I was afraid of saying the wrong thing, and the negative ramifications of saying something ignorant in the workplace. Then he was gone, and the conversation I kept postponing was gone with him.

I think about that silence often, because it is the same silence I now see between two communities that once helped change this country together.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Composting Connected Two Women Across Six Decades

An 82-year-old and 24-year-old bonded over composting—and discovered shared roots, values, and a friendship that broke every generational stereotype.e

Cavan Images/Getty Images

How Composting Connected Two Women Across Six Decades

Every day, we cross paths with people whose lives seem completely different from our own. We exchange polite greetings with neighbors, chat briefly with acquaintances, and pass strangers without ever learning their stories. Yet beneath the surface, we often share more than we realize. Sometimes, all it takes is one conversation. Jean and Bella, 82 and 24 respectively, discovered this through their interest in composting.

Bella regularly attended a Sunday morning "Cookies and Conversation" intergenerational discussion group at Hebrew SeniorLife, where Jean lives in Brookline, MA. The two had spoken before, but only in passing. Like many people meeting someone from a different generation, Bella wasn't always sure how to bridge the gap.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cropped shot of a group of people joining their hands in solidarity

A new union political director explains why labor membership has halved since 1983 even as public approval hits record highs—and what's driving the gap.

LumiNola/Getty Images

The Ongoing Fight for Bread and Roses

Last Monday, I started a new job as the political director for IBEW 569, a local electrical workers' union based here in San Diego. In talking to friends about what I’m doing–while learning, fast, in real time, how to do the job myself–it occurred to me that there’s actually quite a knowledge gap in society today regarding an understanding of what unions are and what they’re supposed to do. So let’s get into it.

A union is, at its core, a group of workers who agree to negotiate together instead of alone. One worker asking a boss for a raise has almost no leverage. A thousand workers asking together hits different. That leverage of teamwork, that collective bargaining, is how the overtime pay, workplace safety standards, and employer-sponsored health insurance all came to exist in this country. None of it was handed down out of corporate goodwill. Fair wages (bread) and dignity (roses) were won, often at real cost. In 1890, the average workweek for manufacturing employees and building tradesmen was around 100 hours or more. Workers in Chicago who rallied for an eight-hour workday faced police violence, but we have that and weekends now because people were willing to lose their jobs, and sometimes their lives, to organize for it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Group of young adult students sit at desks in classroom listening to teacher

Why do Americans respond so differently to hard history lessons? A look at the three psychological mindsets driving the patriotism debate — and a path past it.

Lighthouse Films/Getty Images

“They Hate America”: Patriotism in the Face of Historical Updates

I happened upon a civil discussion blog and read a post by a man who said he was happy to report that when he attended a panel discussion about teaching patriotism in the schools, all went well. He said that’s because most of the people in the bridging organization that hosted the event are “pretty patriotic.” He clarified that by writing, “None of the type of bad actors (and there are many) who want to teach kids to hate America and Western Civilization were represented.”

Someone made a comment about why we can’t incorporate historical change into curriculum and objected to the notion that a segment of the population wants to teach kids to hate America. The man who posted cited what he believes is proof. A last commenter simply input the emoji for a sleeping person, as though the argument was boring or unimportant.

Keep ReadingShow less