Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment

Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment

People reading in a religious setting.

Getty Images, Maskot

In a moment defined by fracture and division, a surprising development has emerged in America's religious landscape. The decades-long decline of Christianity is leveling off. According to new research from the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans identifying as Christian has stabilized at around 62%—a dramatic shift from previous trends that saw consistent year-over-year drops in religious affiliation. This "pause" in religious decline offers a unique opportunity to examine whether faith communities might help heal our nation's deep sociopolitical wounds.

The timing of this latest phenomenon could not be more apropos. As America grapples with unprecedented polarization and the fraying of civic bonds, religious institutions—despite their internal struggles—may be uniquely positioned to foster dialogue, understanding, and responsiveness across divides.


Research shows that spirituality remains resilient even as traditional religious participation wanes. A striking 86% of Americans believe that people have souls beyond their physical bodies, while 79% believe in something spiritual beyond the natural world. The emergence of a shared spiritual foundation, transcending political and denominational boundaries, offers a common grounding for meaningful dialogue. More intriguingly, younger Americans, while less traditionally religious, maintain strong spiritual sensibilities. Among adults aged 18-24, 82% believe in the existence of the soul—nearly matching their grandparents' generation. This spiritual continuity amid institutional change hints at possibilities for intergenerational bridge-building that could help ease sociopolitical tensions.

Religious communities remain among the few spaces where Americans of different political persuasions interact regularly. While political segregation increasingly defines our neighborhoods, workplaces, and social circles, houses of worship continue to bring together people across ideological lines—particularly in racially diverse congregations, which have grown significantly in

recent years. However, leveraging these opportunities requires religious institutions to embrace shifts in their approach to civic engagement:

  1. Faith communities must move beyond the polarizing rhetoric that is often characterized by religious political engagement. The data shows that religious Americans span the political spectrum, particularly across racial and ethnic lines. Spiritual leaders who acknowledge and celebrate this diversity, rather than advance partisan agendas, can help model healthy political dialogue.
  2. Religious institutions should focus on their unique capacity to foster what sociologist Robert Putnam calls "bridging social capital"—connections that link different communities. While many churches have become ideologically homogeneous, those that intentionally create spaces for cross-cultural and cross-political relationship building can help rebuild civic trust.
  3. Faith communities must engage rising generations on their terms, recognizing that spiritual seeking often looks different today than in previous eras. Young adults' strong spiritual inclinations and skepticism of institutions suggest an opportunity to reimagine religious communities that resonate with contemporary sensibilities while preserving ancient wisdom about human flourishing and social harmony.

Additional strategies might include:

  • Establishing interfaith and cross-ideological dialogue programs that bring together diverse congregations for relationship-building and standard action on shared concerns.
  • Creating intergenerational initiatives that pair spiritually-minded emergent leaders with "seasoned" religious practitioners in ways that enable mutual learning and understanding.
  • Cultivating new models of spiritual community that combine traditional practices with contemporary approaches to meaning-making and social engagement.
  • Training religious leaders in the art of facilitating difficult conversations across political and cultural divides.

Stabilizing America's religious landscape is crucial for reimagining faith's role in democracy. Despite their imperfections, religious institutions remain repositories of social capital and ethical wisdom that our fractured society desperately needs.

By embracing their potential as guides or facilitators in navigating contemporary realities, they can help weave our tattered civic fabric together. Such work will require humility and creativity from spiritual guides and facilitators of faith. We must remain open to skepticism while exchanging in good faith among all parties. When many traditional sources of social cohesion have eroded, the persistent spiritual longings revealed in this research—and the institutional networks that have historically nurtured them—may offer essential resources for rebuilding American democracy.

No one faithful institution or individual is charged with reversing secularization or restoring religious dominance. Instead, at best, such institutions and their disciples ought to channel spiritual energy toward healing our divisions and respecting plurality. In this light, the pause in religious decline is an invitation to reimagine how faith can serve the common good in an increasingly diverse society.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less