Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment

Opinion

Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment

People reading in a religious setting.

Getty Images, Maskot

In a moment defined by fracture and division, a surprising development has emerged in America's religious landscape. The decades-long decline of Christianity is leveling off. According to new research from the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans identifying as Christian has stabilized at around 62%—a dramatic shift from previous trends that saw consistent year-over-year drops in religious affiliation. This "pause" in religious decline offers a unique opportunity to examine whether faith communities might help heal our nation's deep sociopolitical wounds.

The timing of this latest phenomenon could not be more apropos. As America grapples with unprecedented polarization and the fraying of civic bonds, religious institutions—despite their internal struggles—may be uniquely positioned to foster dialogue, understanding, and responsiveness across divides.


Research shows that spirituality remains resilient even as traditional religious participation wanes. A striking 86% of Americans believe that people have souls beyond their physical bodies, while 79% believe in something spiritual beyond the natural world. The emergence of a shared spiritual foundation, transcending political and denominational boundaries, offers a common grounding for meaningful dialogue. More intriguingly, younger Americans, while less traditionally religious, maintain strong spiritual sensibilities. Among adults aged 18-24, 82% believe in the existence of the soul—nearly matching their grandparents' generation. This spiritual continuity amid institutional change hints at possibilities for intergenerational bridge-building that could help ease sociopolitical tensions.

Religious communities remain among the few spaces where Americans of different political persuasions interact regularly. While political segregation increasingly defines our neighborhoods, workplaces, and social circles, houses of worship continue to bring together people across ideological lines—particularly in racially diverse congregations, which have grown significantly in

recent years. However, leveraging these opportunities requires religious institutions to embrace shifts in their approach to civic engagement:

  1. Faith communities must move beyond the polarizing rhetoric that is often characterized by religious political engagement. The data shows that religious Americans span the political spectrum, particularly across racial and ethnic lines. Spiritual leaders who acknowledge and celebrate this diversity, rather than advance partisan agendas, can help model healthy political dialogue.
  2. Religious institutions should focus on their unique capacity to foster what sociologist Robert Putnam calls "bridging social capital"—connections that link different communities. While many churches have become ideologically homogeneous, those that intentionally create spaces for cross-cultural and cross-political relationship building can help rebuild civic trust.
  3. Faith communities must engage rising generations on their terms, recognizing that spiritual seeking often looks different today than in previous eras. Young adults' strong spiritual inclinations and skepticism of institutions suggest an opportunity to reimagine religious communities that resonate with contemporary sensibilities while preserving ancient wisdom about human flourishing and social harmony.

Additional strategies might include:

  • Establishing interfaith and cross-ideological dialogue programs that bring together diverse congregations for relationship-building and standard action on shared concerns.
  • Creating intergenerational initiatives that pair spiritually-minded emergent leaders with "seasoned" religious practitioners in ways that enable mutual learning and understanding.
  • Cultivating new models of spiritual community that combine traditional practices with contemporary approaches to meaning-making and social engagement.
  • Training religious leaders in the art of facilitating difficult conversations across political and cultural divides.

Stabilizing America's religious landscape is crucial for reimagining faith's role in democracy. Despite their imperfections, religious institutions remain repositories of social capital and ethical wisdom that our fractured society desperately needs.

By embracing their potential as guides or facilitators in navigating contemporary realities, they can help weave our tattered civic fabric together. Such work will require humility and creativity from spiritual guides and facilitators of faith. We must remain open to skepticism while exchanging in good faith among all parties. When many traditional sources of social cohesion have eroded, the persistent spiritual longings revealed in this research—and the institutional networks that have historically nurtured them—may offer essential resources for rebuilding American democracy.

No one faithful institution or individual is charged with reversing secularization or restoring religious dominance. Instead, at best, such institutions and their disciples ought to channel spiritual energy toward healing our divisions and respecting plurality. In this light, the pause in religious decline is an invitation to reimagine how faith can serve the common good in an increasingly diverse society.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less