Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

Opinion

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.


“What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” by Adam Cvijanovic thefulcrum.us

Commissioned by Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the mural marks the first major artistic addition to the cathedral in 75 years. It began as a depiction of the 1879 Apparition at Knock, Ireland. Still, it evolved into something far more expansive: a sweeping narrative that links biblical refugees, American saints, and modern-day migrants in a single, luminous arc. The result is a mural that doesn’t just decorate—it interrogates.

“Literally, Jesus, Mary, and Joseph were refugees as they had to flee to Egypt,” Dolan told CBS News. “So, what would you think of an ode to the immigrants?”

That question—posed rhetorically by one of the most visible Catholic leaders in the country—lands with force. In a time when migrants are vilified, asylum seekers are politicized, and border policies are weaponized, Cvijanovic’s mural dares to remind us that the sacred and the displaced have always been intertwined. The Lamb of God, Mary, Joseph, and John are rendered not as distant icons, but as part of a continuum that includes Ellis Island arrivals, contemporary refugees, and even the homeless.

“There’s been a permission to be cruel,” Cvijanovic said. “This is not about saying, ‘Well, there should be open borders.’ The Church isn’t saying anything like that. The Church is just saying, ‘People are people. Treat them with respect.’”

The mural’s most striking panels depict present-day immigrants waiting to be welcomed—an artistic choice that has sparked conversation about faith and politics. Dolan, who has both participated in presidential inaugurations and criticized harsh immigration policies, acknowledged the mural’s potential to stir debate.

“People have said, ‘They’re gonna look at this as a political statement.’ And I said, ‘Well, it kind of wasn’t intended to be a political statement, but if that’s the way they interpret it, fine with me,’” he said.

That ambivalence is telling. In a country where compassion is often mistaken for partisanship, even a mural can become a battleground. But Dolan’s willingness to embrace that tension is commendable. He’s not asking for consensus—he’s asking for conscience.

What makes the mural so powerful? It doesn’t preach policy; it preaches presence. It doesn’t offer solutions; it offers solidarity. And in doing so, it reclaims the role of sacred art as a mirror to our moral condition. Cvijanovic’s mural is a masterclass in narrative layering. It’s not just a painting—it’s a platform. It invites viewers to see immigration not as a crisis, but as a crucible of faith, resilience, and shared humanity. It challenges us to move beyond headlines and into heartlines.

Cvijanovic’s work reminds us that art can do what politics often cannot—it can humanize. It can hold complexity without collapsing into slogans. It can speak to the soul while nudging the conscience. And in a time when cruelty is codified and empathy is endangered, that’s no small feat.

St. Patrick’s Cathedral, which completed a $177 million restoration in 2015, welcomes over five million visitors annually.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network. Balta is the only person to serve twice as president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ).

Read More

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

Sophie Kim

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep Reading Show less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep Reading Show less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep Reading Show less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep Reading Show less