Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Corporate political dollars spotlighted by new interactive database

Money surrounding the Capitol
Douglas Rissing/Getty Images

The Center for Political Accountability recently launched The Barbara and Morris Pearl 527 Interactive Database, a user-friendly system created to shine a spotlight on under-the-radar corporate political spending in the United States.

This groundbreaking tool provides detailed and targeted access to information on contributions from publicly traded American companies to major partisan political organizations called 527s, for the section of the IRS code that governs them.


The database also provides information on spending by these nonprofit, tax-exempt organizations on competitive and high-profile state races, including gubernatorial, attorney general, legislative and state elections.

It focuses on company spending using treasury or corporate funds. These are used for unlimited contributions that are in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.

Housed on CPA’s website, this tool will help companies conduct robust due diligence on their own and their peers’ and competitors’ political spending and understand its impact. It will help shareholders, consumers, journalists and other researchers follow the money trail for millions of political dollars.

Users will be able to tailor their searches with advanced filtering options, including by business sector, political cycle and company headquarters, providing unparalleled insights into trends in corporate electoral spending.

“The influence of corporate money in politics is a crucial issue that affects governance and public trust,” said Jeanne Hanna, CPA’s vice president for research and the architect of the new database.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

“This database represents a major step toward greater transparency by offering an accessible way to track the flow of corporate treasury funds via third-party groups into important state elections,” Hanna said. “It brings vast flows of little-known political spending into the sunlight.”

Hanna also noted that state capitals now play a pivotal role in shaping policies on health care, education, environmental regulation and voting rights, directly impacting Americans' daily lives. As a result, political spending in state races has become more critical in influencing election outcomes and driving the direction of these essential policy areas at national and state levels.

The database has two interactive portals:

  1. Donations Database: Tracking the flow of funds from public companies to major 527 organizations and covering available data from 2010 through October 2024;
  2. Spending Database: Analyzing how these 527 groups spend corporate contributions on key state-level races and covering the 2022 and 2024 cycles.

As data on the 2024 election cycle continues to be released, this tool provides a timely and essential resource for understanding the role of corporate money in shaping state-level elections. It is designed for users to easily navigate and uncover data that were previously difficult to access.

A unique feature of this tool is its integration with original campaign finance documents from state databases. Each entry in the spending database links directly to the official state filings, ensuring full transparency and providing users with access to primary source materials.

In the near future, CPA will schedule a webinar to assist journalists in their use of the database.

The database was created and launched with the generous support of Barbara and Morris Pearl, who underwrote it. Mr. Pearl is a member of the CPA board of directors and a strong supporter of the center. He is a former managing director at BlackRock.

Freed is president and co-founder of the Center for Political Accountability.

Read More

Dictionary definition of tariff
Would replacing the income tax with higher tariffs help ‘struggling Americans’?
Devonyu/Getty Images

Could Trump’s tariffs have unintended consequences that hurt America?

The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been head-spinning. President Trump and his team were well-prepared to launch their policy agenda, signing over 50 executive orders, the most in a president's first month in more than 40 years. A major focus has been economic policy, first with immigration raids, which were quickly followed by announcements of tariffs on imports from America’s biggest trade partners.

The tariff announcements have followed a meandering and confusing course. President Trump announced the first tariffs on February 1, but within 24 hours, he suspended the tariffs on Mexico and Canada in favor of “negotiations.” Mexico and Canada agreed to enforce their borders better to stop migrants and fentanyl imports, which the Trump administration called a victory. Despite the triumphalist rhetoric, the enforcement measures were substantially the same as what both countries were already planning to do.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

The flag of India.

Canva Images

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

In the intricate landscape of global geopolitics, the ascendancy of Indian Americans stands as a quiet yet transformative force—a phenomenon that demands serious consideration. While traditional paradigms of power focus on military might or economic clout, the strategic leverage wielded by this diaspora is rewriting the rules of global influence. India’s economic trajectory reflects its ambitions on the global stage. Contributing 4% to global GDP today, the nation is poised to become the world’s third $10 trillion economy within two decades. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts India will account for 18% of total global growth by decade’s end, a rise that challenges established economic hierarchies.

Trade data between India and the United States reflects the growing interdependence: In 2020, U.S. imports to India stood at $51.3 billion. This figure grew to $80.1 billion in 2024, alongside a trade deficit swelling from $24.2 billion to $41.5 billion. This trade expansion is mirrored by Indian-American professionals dominating key sectors of the U.S. economy. With a median household income of $119,000, Indian Americans outperform national averages and hold influential roles across corporate and governmental institutions. CEOs of global giants like Microsoft, Google, and Citibank exemplify this trend, along with leadership roles in companies like Apple, Intel, and Dell.

Keep ReadingShow less
Will Trump’s immigration crackdown be good or bad for the economy?

Roofers on an 8-12 pitch roof laying under-layment before installing roof tile. Roofer is throwing safety line out of the way.

Getty Images//TerryJ

Will Trump’s immigration crackdown be good or bad for the economy?

In his first days in office, President Donald Trump wasted no time showing he means business, announcing a crackdown on immigration. He declared a national emergency, signed a raft of executive orders, sent 1,500 active duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, and his Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) has initiated raids on thousands of migrants across the nation.

The issue of immigration has always been multifaceted, impacting both the economy and human rights, not to mention the expensive logistical operation necessary to deport millions of people. But my discussion below is focused specifically on this question: what will happen to the economy if many of the immigrant workers (who are also consumers and taxpayers) who fill many jobs in the construction, restaurant, health care, agriculture, and elder care industries, suddenly are whisked away?

Keep ReadingShow less
Tariffs: Not a tax, and not free money

United States trade cargo container hanging against clouds background

Getty Images//Iskandar Zulkarnean

Tariffs: Not a tax, and not free money

During the recent election season, there was much talk of Trump’s plan to lay tariffs on the importation of foreign goods. Pundits, politicians, and journalists to the left of center consistently referred to them as a tax on the American people. Many of those to the right of center, especially those of the MAGA contingent, seemed to imply they are a pain-free way for the federal government to raise money.

Some correctly said that the country essentially ran on tariffs in its early history. Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary and arguably the godfather of our initial financial system, successfully proposed and implemented a tariff system with two goals in mind. Fund the young American government and protect young American businesses against competition from established foreign companies. The second bill signed by President George Washington was a broad tariff bill.

Keep ReadingShow less