Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Corporate political dollars spotlighted by new interactive database

Money surrounding the Capitol
Douglas Rissing/Getty Images

The Center for Political Accountability recently launched The Barbara and Morris Pearl 527 Interactive Database, a user-friendly system created to shine a spotlight on under-the-radar corporate political spending in the United States.

This groundbreaking tool provides detailed and targeted access to information on contributions from publicly traded American companies to major partisan political organizations called 527s, for the section of the IRS code that governs them.


The database also provides information on spending by these nonprofit, tax-exempt organizations on competitive and high-profile state races, including gubernatorial, attorney general, legislative and state elections.

It focuses on company spending using treasury or corporate funds. These are used for unlimited contributions that are in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.

Housed on CPA’s website, this tool will help companies conduct robust due diligence on their own and their peers’ and competitors’ political spending and understand its impact. It will help shareholders, consumers, journalists and other researchers follow the money trail for millions of political dollars.

Users will be able to tailor their searches with advanced filtering options, including by business sector, political cycle and company headquarters, providing unparalleled insights into trends in corporate electoral spending.

“The influence of corporate money in politics is a crucial issue that affects governance and public trust,” said Jeanne Hanna, CPA’s vice president for research and the architect of the new database.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

“This database represents a major step toward greater transparency by offering an accessible way to track the flow of corporate treasury funds via third-party groups into important state elections,” Hanna said. “It brings vast flows of little-known political spending into the sunlight.”

Hanna also noted that state capitals now play a pivotal role in shaping policies on health care, education, environmental regulation and voting rights, directly impacting Americans' daily lives. As a result, political spending in state races has become more critical in influencing election outcomes and driving the direction of these essential policy areas at national and state levels.

The database has two interactive portals:

  1. Donations Database: Tracking the flow of funds from public companies to major 527 organizations and covering available data from 2010 through October 2024;
  2. Spending Database: Analyzing how these 527 groups spend corporate contributions on key state-level races and covering the 2022 and 2024 cycles.

As data on the 2024 election cycle continues to be released, this tool provides a timely and essential resource for understanding the role of corporate money in shaping state-level elections. It is designed for users to easily navigate and uncover data that were previously difficult to access.

A unique feature of this tool is its integration with original campaign finance documents from state databases. Each entry in the spending database links directly to the official state filings, ensuring full transparency and providing users with access to primary source materials.

In the near future, CPA will schedule a webinar to assist journalists in their use of the database.

The database was created and launched with the generous support of Barbara and Morris Pearl, who underwrote it. Mr. Pearl is a member of the CPA board of directors and a strong supporter of the center. He is a former managing director at BlackRock.

Freed is president and co-founder of the Center for Political Accountability.

Read More

Mark Zuckerberg holding a pair of glasses

Mark Zuckerberg, who is now worth more than $200 billion, shows off new wearabel tech at the Meta Connect developer conference in September.

Andrej Sokolow/picture alliance via Getty Images

We have extreme inequality in America, and it’s getting worse

Cooper is the author of “How America Works … and Why it Doesn’t.

Bloomberg recently reported that Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg is now worth over $200 billion. He’s not alone. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Tesla founder Elon Musk, and LVMH founder Bernard Arnault are also worth north of $200 billion.

The news is a searing reminder of the uneven distribution of wealth in America. In the same country as Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Musk reside millions of people without a reliable source of food. (Arnault lives in France.) Redistributing just a small portion of the richest Americans’ wealth could alleviate tremendous human suffering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mobile phone listing Google, Amazon, Meta, Apple and Microsoft

Like black holes, the largest companies have a reach seemingly exceeds human capabilities, writes Frazier.

SOPA Images/Getty Images

Corporate black holes prevent fair play in the U.S. economy

Frazier is an assistant professor at the Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University and a Tarbell fellow.

NASA defines a black hole as “a place in space where gravity pulls so much that even light can not get out.” This celestial abnormality can even distort space-time. Though invisible to the human eye, a black hole is detectable by the extent to which everything around it is morphed to its will.

The same is true of our biggest corporations. The total reach of companies like Amazon, Meta and Google seemingly exceeds human capabilities. Yet, the extent to which our laws, culture and daily lives revolve around these corporate black holes reveals a hard truth: Fair play does not characterize our economy. The best ideas may never come to fruition and the smartest people may never realize their potential — they lack the escape velocity necessary to operate beyond the pull of the black holes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young adults shopping for clothes

Members of Gen Z consume at an unsustainable rate: clothes, makeup, technology and every other imaginable product.

RyanJLane/Getty Images

Mass consumerism and the hypocrisy of Gen Z

Pruthi is a professor of entrepreneurship at San Jose State University, where she is a co-founder and director ofHonorsX, and a public voices fellow with The OpEd Project. Kharbanda is a senior at Presentation High School in San Jose, Calif.

California lawmakers recently approved two bills banning grocery and convenience stores statewide from offering customers reusable plastic bags. These bills are the next step in combating plastic waste, but what about the waste from mass consumerism that has come to pervade our lives?

Through the past decades, we have been trained to shop, purchase and consume products to solve our problems. While mending old clothing or refurbishing used goods have become things of the past, new products that are ubiquitously promoted are cramming our stores, screens, mailboxes and nearly every aspect of our lives.

Growing up in the digital age, Gen Z is the prime target for this consumerist culture. Their lives are catered toward finding flaws with what they currently own and buying the next best thing. In the process, our world lays waste, proving the disastrous effects of those spending habits.

Keep ReadingShow less
Iceberg hiding money below
wenmei Zhou/Getty Images

The hidden iceberg: Why corporate treasury spending matters

Freed is president and co-founder of the Center for Political Accountability.

Too much media coverage and other political analyses focus on contributions by corporate political action committees but overlook the serious consequences of political contributions made directly from corporate treasury funds.

In talks with corporate executives, the default too often is almost exclusively on company political engagement through its PAC. This ignores what one political scientist has likened to an iceberg of spending, where disclosure is not required (and hence is “dark money”) or is partial (only by the recipient, not the donor) and totals are much greater than the amounts allowed for PAC spending.

Keep ReadingShow less