Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Profits Over Patients: Re-Examining Systems As Culprit in Dementia Care (or Lack Thereof)

Opinion

A close up of a nurse's hand resting on the shoulder of an older man who's hand rests on top.

September is World Alzheimer’s Awareness Month. Dr. Dona Kim Murphey explains how systemic failures, Medicare privatization, and racial disparities are deepening the dementia care crisis.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

September is World Alzheimer's Awareness Month. Alzheimer's is the most common kind of dementia, a disorder characterized by the progressive loss of brain cells and, in its final stages, complete dependence—the inability to remember, speak, move, or even eat or swallow unassisted. Many end up in nursing homes. Seven million people are impacted by dementia in the United States today, a number that will more than double in the next 25 years.

But awareness is not just about understanding the magnitude of the problem or content expertise on the choices we make as individuals to mitigate the enormous present and future challenges of this disease. It is about a consciousness of the role of systems, namely insurance and government, that are seriously undermining our ability to care.


In an era when brain health is framed as "brain capital" and the argument for social good in the private sector only holds with a handsome financial return, we are in trouble.

We learned earlier this year through an investigation by The Guardian that UnitedHealth Group covertly incentivized nursing homes to slash hospital transfers through a program of bonuses and internal "budgets" that reduced or rationed admissions and gatekept access to acute care, resulting in medically and ethically unconscionable delays. All the cases in this exposé involved the sudden onset of potentially catastrophic brain symptoms in nursing home residents. Neurological conditions are the costliest diseases of aging, and stroke and dementia are disproportionately represented in institutional care.

I am a neurologist, activist, and support caregiver to several people living with dementia in my family. I was alarmed to learn that, in addition to the tactics described above, UnitedHealth allegedly pressured cognitively impaired nursing home residents to switch to Medicare Advantage (MA), which incentivizes cost-cutting through lump-sum payments. Staff also reported being urged to convince MA members to adopt Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders to avoid expensive hospitalizations.

Dialed into the problem of segregated admissions and racialized quality of care disparities in nursing homes through my advocacy—and knowing that 55–70% of Asian, Black, and Latino Medicare beneficiaries enroll in MA versus 43% in non-Hispanic whites (consistent with racialized economic disparities)—it becomes clear how perverse racialized incentives drive perverse racialized outcomes in nursing home care.

Cutting costs by functionally cutting coverage under MA has become a windfall for health insurance companies. UnitedHealth has dominated this landscape. MA has funneled public dollars into privatized healthcare and continues to grow since its inception as "Medicare+Choice" in 1997, with 6% market share then and 54% today.

The explosion of privatized plans—paired with little government oversight—has corrupted health outcomes in nursing homes. This compounds with the almost certain loss of home and community-based services through a nearly $1T Medicaid cut in 2025. And tragically, if we do nothing, it is people living with dementia and our families who will shoulder the greatest financial costs, approximately $500k USD over the often decades-long course of the illness, with a corresponding (and incalculable) burden on our emotional, social, and physical health and well-being.

This may seem like a David and Goliath scenario, but ordinary people can take action.

  • Reframe the issue: Decommodify healthcare. We have the right to be healthy. While there are financial liabilities for violating this principle, the market will not fix this.
  • Share your story of denied care publicly and with regulators (e.g., ProPublica, CMS).
  • Pressure lawmakers to increase oversight, end lump sum payments, and support traditional Medicare.
  • Vote for those who oppose Medicare privatization.
  • Demand divestment from insurance giants like UnitedHealth by employers or pensions.
  • Educate others about Medicare Advantage’s hidden costs and care restrictions.
  • Support local alternatives to institutional care, such as adult day centers, home care programs, and caregiver support.
Dr. Dona Kim Murphey is a neurologist, caregiver, and health advocate who founded PrognosUs to advance ethical, equitable, and community-centered dementia caregiver support.

Read More

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less
Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) arrives for a news conference following a House GOP Conference Meeting at the U.S. Capitol on September 16, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Republican leadership faces a long week as they try to rally House Republicans behind a stopgap funding bill to avert a shutdown, while also navigating growing pressure to boost security for lawmakers in the wake of Charlie Kirk's killing.

Getty Images, Kent Nishimura

Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Every autumn brings its rituals: football, spectacular fall colors, and in Washington, the countdown to a government shutdown. Once a rare emergency, these funding standoffs have become as routine as pumpkin‑flavored beverages.

September 30 marks when federal funding will expire, a recurring cliff since the 1970s. Each year it looms larger, shaping the rhythm of Congress’s work. Lawmakers are again scrambling—not to solve problems, but merely to keep the lights on.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Jobs Report Is a Warning, Not a Blip

August’s jobs report showed just 22,000 jobs added, unemployment at 4.3%, and gold hitting record highs — signaling deeper economic troubles ahead.

Getty Images, J Studios

The Jobs Report Is a Warning, Not a Blip

The latest U.S. jobs report was more than just a miss—it was a warning. Employers added only 22,000 jobs in August, well below expectations of 75,000, and unemployment climbed to 4.3 percent, its highest level in nearly four years. June’s figures were quietly revised down to a net loss of 13,000 jobs, the first outright contraction since the pandemic’s peak. Markets reacted sharply: the dollar slid to six-week lows, while gold surged past $3,600 an ounce, setting a record for the 31st time this year.

For years, U.S. policymakers and presidents of both parties have promised resilience. Donald Trump has claimed his second term would deliver a “blue-collar boom.” But the August numbers suggest something deeper than a cooling labor market. They point to a structural weakness in an economy where job creation is slowing even as corporate profits remain strong, automation accelerates, and wage growth stagnates.

Keep ReadingShow less